Kaitlin Pearson Unfairly Put on Administrative Leave

Posted in Girls
Tue, Jan 21 - 8:57 pm EST | 10 months ago by
Comments: 62
Share This Post:
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

An assistant special ed teacher named Kaitlin Pearson has been put on administrative leave in Fitchburg, Massachusetts. Her crime? In her free time, she poses nude and makes money as a model. Even though the side gig hasn’t negatively impacted her work, South Street Elementary decided to remove her.

Look below for 31 pictures of Kaitlin Pearson, who is stunningly beautiful and has a bright future in the modelling world if she selects that path. Friends say she is a great woman who cared endlessly for her students.

The school received an anonymous packet with her uncensored extracurricular footage and decided to take extreme action. Personally, I think it was the wrong move. As long as she’s not breaking the law, she should be able to do what she wants when away from the campus.

Here are the images that I promised above. Be sure to click the right arrow to view the entire gallery. The ones at the end are especially sizzling — don’t miss out!


Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

Kaitlin Pearson

 

(source: instagram.com)

Related Posts

Share This Post:
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • SnowShark87

    id like to point out she’s a roll model as a teacher would you want your kids exposed to that?

    • Steve K.

      Roll model? Hamburg or hot dog? I don’t want my kids exposed to your lack of grammar and spelling. It’s a bad example and you should keep it to yourself.

    • Johnson

      Sure. Who cares? Do I want my kids to be exposed to picking a career as a janitor or bus driver?

    • Jeremy

      How would children be exposed to it? My wife is a nurse and works with the public. Am I not allowed to have sex with her because “your kids might be exposed to it”?

    • Gawdzila

      YES. I wouldn’t have even the slightest concern.

      In fact it could even be a positive experience. I’d be happy if my kid came away from her class with the idea that a woman could do something like that and still be respected and thought of as something other than a slut — even be a role model (not a roll model).

      That IS the problem, after all, isn’t it? You worried about someone’s daughter growing up and taking some racy pictures and then being dumped on by people like you? Well guess what: you’re the one causing the problem.

      If people like you weren’t busy perpetuating the idea that women who display their sexuality are morally defective sluts and not fit to be in positions of authority, then maybe we’d have a society where sexuality isn’t vilified and therefore there would BE NO repercussions for relatively innocuous and normal things like this.

    • athynz1

      Again – for the slow class – what she does on her time is her business. If some jealous hag had not anonymously submitted the photos to the school board and media she would be teaching kids in her classroom with no issues or complaints from any of the parents, fellow teachers, or administrators.

      I just want the person (referred to as that cowardly backstabbing steaming pile of crap) who submitted those pics to summon the cajones and spine to step forward and say that they did it. I think Ms. Pearson should know who it was that shoved the knife in her back and is attempting to or has killed her career in teaching.

    • barbieK1211

      Hell no!! She posed too provocatively in some of the pictures with other women. Oh ya not totally naked. Her fingertip covering a nipple is not exposed???

  • Boston Dad

    It’s up to the parents to control what the kids see or not see. This girl has the right to pursue any career she chooses. She’s not a sexual deviant, she’s a model. Lay off and give her job back, her rights have been violated by the administration.

  • TD63

    I just don’t understand liberals and the school system…one minute I’m hearing that they want to teach middle schoolers about porn as art, anal sex, oral sex and masturbation, then they fire a teacher because she makes money as a model who sometimes poses nude.

    • Asura

      I just don’t understand why you think everybody in existence that takes some action or says some claim is a liberal.
      Maybe you should think about your own assumptions before claiming to be unable to understand.

      Just be honest as say you want to blame liberals at every chance you get instead of hiding that fact like a coward.

    • ChuckNoland

      He may be indeed jumping the gun but statistically speaking school administrators are OVERWHELMINGLY liberal.

    • Gawdzila

      WTF are you talking about? You’re just making crap up. No liberal I know (and I know a lot of liberals) has EVER condoned the idea of firing a teacher for having been a model, nude or otherwise. *I* certainly don’t think it’s fair or reasonable, and I’m pretty damn liberal.

    • Sman88

      I’m sure if you had to classify it I would guess the school is conservative, not liberal. Kind of like you being an idiot.

  • janus

    nice body but homely face….

    • Sman88

      Your face must look like my ass then if you think she is homely.

  • Joe Conry

    that’s what i call-Very Special Ed

  • woo hoo

    I have a son who is special needs……I wish his teacher looked like that…

  • Fucked her last year

    So some butterface skank who works with retard kids moonlights as an exhibitionist whore. So fucking what?

    The real problem with schools is we allow fags who have chosen the lost and confused homosexual lifestyle, now THAT is what i call a bad example to kids. Brainwashing kids into the fag agenda.

  • Paul

    That butt!!

    • bosoxinny

      digitally enhanced…my friend

    • Paul

      Yeah, most (all?) glamour/model shots are, alas. But I’m going to imagine she was most of the way there, naturally, and just got the minimal amount of help. :p Don’t ruin this for me, man! :D

      But seriously…it would be interesting to see the original, non-retouched pics. I’m a Photoshop user (20 years), although not in the fashion/glamour arena. But it’s amazing (and kinda scary) what can be done, pushing those pixels around. Anything is possible, and in the hands of a top-notch artist/retoucher, it’s hard to tell what’s real and what isn’t.

    • susie q

      they aren’t touched up that much…. shes naturally that gorgeous

  • Curtiss

    I can help fix this problem. I’ll sacrifice myself and help her make a baby. Then she will have to take a break from modeling and she can be a role model for her kid afterwards. The things I do for people lol.

  • barbieK1211

    Its interesting how most of the positive comments are from men vs women and she apparently has no respect for her job or public employee. Hey guys I doubt she wants to make babies with you as she is posing with another woman in her photos. Lesbian? Keep her OUT of the classroom. Children have enough to digest and do not need this controversy over someone who belongs in the Hugh Hefner mansion not in a School room!

    • Corey

      She actually has a boyfriend, and is very professional. Hearing something like this statement. Modeling is a career, period. She is not posing fully nude, and clearly states that, as well as having a boyfriend.

    • barbieK1211

      Are you serious? That is about as naked as they get without showing her nipples or vagina. Take another look at the pictures Corey and get the stars out of your eyes. Boyfriend or not she in provocative pictures with another female.

    • Smitty

      She models for magazines that the children she works with likely will never see. And her sexual preference should not be an issue for anyone either. Is she a punctual, professional, dedicated, caring aide? As a parent, those would be my primary concerns.

    • whomadeyougod

      Are you serious? You’re ridiculous. Are YOUR children accessing this? If so you might want to re-think your parenting. I’m detecting some jealousy because she is way better looking than you. Also what’s up with you caring so much about the lesbian thing? Do you have something to hide or are you a homophobe? what’s it even matter unless you’re a bigot jackass anyway?

    • bosoxinny

      That’s porn…simple as that.

    • FashionMyAss

      I agree with Barbie… Keep her out of the classroom. Never mind the fact that Barbie doesn’t know how Kaity relates to the special needs students… never mind the fact that chances are Kaity is great with the students … hell let’s just ignore everything related to Kaity and the students and just focus on her modeling pictures because she probably is stripping for those students and exposing them to everything in Pandora’s Box… ***/sarcasm***

      Talk about making such a huge assumption over a picture… The only time we should be focused on her modelling career is when it directly threatens her relationship with the students. If she is out there making them feel bad, calling them ugly, stupid, etc. then she should be fired. But if she is there making them feel happy, loved, and special, she should NOT be fired. Any person who thinks she should be fired is reacting probably because a) she looks better than them, b) she looks better than them, c) she looks better than them… this has nothing to do with her relations with the students, because if it did, then every article out there would be talking about how modelling affects the student-teacher relationship. But I haven’t read a single article that mentions that…

    • barbieK1211

      Oh and you know for a fact that she is an awesome Special Ed teacher? Her morals are BAD .. period.

    • athynz1

      I love how none of her critics address her actual teaching credentials – and I’m willing to wager that it is because you are not able to. IOW if these pics had not surfaced she would be doing just fine in the classroom. What this girl does on HER time is HER business – end of story. As for her not wanting to make babies with me – I’m sure if she met me she would want to but as I’m quite happily married I;d have to decline.

    • No way

      Hey “Barbie”, your name is kinda ironic isn’t it? Please go back to the stone age where you belong.

  • Ronnie

    Dress this up in popular pc morality all you want. But the fact remains that no student who sees their teacher in pics like this will ever take that teacher seriously again. She’s lost her credibility as an educator, and there’s no getting it back even if she keeps her job. Everyone wants to have their cake and eat it, too. But you can’t teach kids during the day, pose in highly provocative nudes at night, and expect both worlds to remain separate. It’s just a matter of time before both worlds collide. Doesn’t this story already prove that? I say yes.

    • athynz1

      The ONLY reason those worlds collided is due to someone who anonymously submitted the pictures. I wonder who the coward was who does not have the cajones to reveal who they are.

    • barbieK1211

      Your Right Ronnie. Too bad so many ignorant people here (not all) cannot see this point.

  • tired

    Another example of how the workplace wants to own you on or off the clock.

  • john oleary

    .. i believe that this young woman is misguided ..
    i know that Fitchburg is a high crime town – with lots of drugs ..
    ..with regards to the – soft porn modelling – it does not mix with teaching ..
    there is so much — sleaze around the porn industry ..

    her teaching career is over ..
    good luck to her in the future ..
    im sure she feels — overexposed –
    and maybe used by the “modelling Industry ”
    i hope she has a good life ..

  • Steve Revill

    These were artistic, tastefully done nude images. At no time does she show anything that your kid couldn’t see on prime time tv. The responsibility for your child seeing inappropriate images falls to the parents. Our computer is in the front room and we don’t let our kids watch what consider inappropriate. She should not lose her job when she has broken no law. Unless there is a morality clause in her contract she will be able to fight and win. Speaking as a high school teacher myself, please remember that we are people too. We have lives outside of school, leave us alone!

  • pizwiz

    you have the right to do anything you want on your free time

    • andy

      No, you don’t

  • bosoxinny

    Well, it’s not modeling. It’s porn, but it doesn’t concern me, so I really don’t care.

  • The Truth

    The only ones who suffer here are her current male students who in twenty years from now find out they had a teacher who was a nude model . They will be kicking themselves in the head for not hitting on her… am I right fellas? Boys will be boys.

    Ps. I was a bad kid once just like most/all of you… and I clearly remember being able to find pornography despite having protective parents. If I didn’t have access, my classmates sure as hell did. It would be discussed in meetings during recess…. is every adult stupid or are your brains dried out? Think about your own childhood before speaking…

    people don’t mention this girls fb also shows her drinking and partying, caption saying “real friends drink together” or some bs. It’s public. her students can easily see it from the school computer. Her nude photos will increase the sex drive in boys causing them to harass girls and judge them. This will make girls feel bad and look at this model as guidance to look cute. That’s when teenage pregnancy. To all you dumb feminists, Models are not role models comfortable with their bodies, they are the reason why overweight girls or girls with any natural “defect” feel bad and change themselves. It’s not progress for females, nor males and instead contributes to the epidemic of sexual exploitation. A real model, can model dresses and get plenty of positive attention without making a man want to bust a nut… I’m just saying… it seems LOGICAL to me. She should be given a ultimatum.

    • the truth

      **that’s when teenage pregnancy occurs.

      Fucking typos

    • David Mott

      I can’t wait until we move past this awful period in history where scumbags attempt to ruin schoolteacher’s careers and are successful… She took “racy” pictures, probably before she even became a teacher, does that mean she diddles kids? Of course not. So what’s the problem? There is none, except your stupid backwards attitudes. We’re not in the 1950s anymore. Teachers are human beings and sometimes (!) have a sex life and sexy hobbies like this. They can still be teachers. Grow up, stop thinking in binary and being so judgmental.

      I mean really… think about the ~brave soul~ who anonymously sent these pictures to the school where she works. Do you think he was concerned about the children being around this woman? No, that was furthest from his mind. He is a petty, lowlife, piece of human garbage who wanted to RUIN her CAREER. It doesn’t really matter if they were professionally shot for money or private photos, just because they’re out there floating around doesn’t mean it’s okay to pop it in their boss’s fucking inbox for your personal revenge or whatever. Even if the employer doesn’t have a real moral problem with it they often end up firing the teacher anyway because people naturally are immature idiots and wouldn’t stop creating drama about it. Hey, think about it: it could happen to you. You don’t have photos like that? Well, some people are really good at Photoshop these days…

      Just wanted you to have a good think about this cowardly jackass before you start in with the “Hurr durr dumb slut had it coming” “Duuuhhh well she can always go back to her modeling career what’s the big deal” shit-flingin’ party

  • Bill Marshall

    So there are pictures of her having her breasts rubbed by another woman. In the eyes of the law that is sexual activity so there are public pictures of her engaged in sexual activities with a woman which means she is promoting gay sex for all to see including impressionable children in her school. These were not private pitcures on her boyfriends phone. Would we allow a person pictured at a kkk rally burning a cross to continue? That is “legal outside behavior” also.

  • LordBobo

    She needs to be removed from her job. How are the mothers of these children supposed to trust their husbands around such a harlot? She’s just a filthy tramp waiting to get your husband in her clutches.

    • Freeman63

      “How are the mothers of these children supposed to trust their husbands around such a harlot?”

      Or how are the fathers of these children supposed to trust their wives around such a harlot? She’s posing with other women, not men. Of course, in your world of penis envy, it is only men who stray. Except for the filthy tramp…

      “She’s just a filthy tramp waiting to get your husband in her clutches.”

      Something tells me this comment is based on personal experience

    • jimjimmy

      I wish!

    • athynz1

      The insecurity is strong with this one. I find it amusing that the reasoning behind you desiring her to be fired is your own insecurity.The question should not be her attractiveness, her “availability”, or her other profession – the question is do you trust your man yes or no? If you do then all else is immaterial unless he betrays that trust – then it’s HIS fault as much if not more so than hers. If you don’t trust him then why are you with him?

    • guest

      Harlot ? Did you time travel from the past.

  • Bayrider

    Will you marry me….please just for a little while.

  • Richard Spalding

    Is she single?

  • agb1953 .

    And she’ll be able to further her modeling career using the payout she gets from her lawsuit against the school district. If we could get more teachers who looked like that and had similar side jobs we could significantly impact the male portion of America’s 40% high school dropout rate.

  • Al Falfa

    She’s a special ed teacher? I wanna be retarded.

  • Country Mom

    As a mom, if you are allowing your child to see pictures like that, that parent is doing something seriously wrong. She’s a beautiful woman and as long as one job isnt brought into the other, then leave the poor woman alone. People with a Holier then thou attitude must be walking around with some serious halos over their heads.

    • andy

      You are very out of touch with reality if you think you have control of everything your child sees. Unless you keep your child locked in the basement of course….

  • lame

    You edited the photos… lame

  • charlieeee

    i dont think its good for her students, girls will look up to her as a role model thinking its good to use your body as an sexual object to make a living, and guys will think its ok to treat women as sexual objects since they put themselves in that position anyways, i dont know its just very complicated because she is in her right to do it, but teachers are supposed to teach good values to children, stripping for a magazine is not a good value r at least not what they are supposed to go to school to learn

  • Jim

    If she wants to teach and is good at this profession, let her teach for G—-sake. Her picks are a different profession at which she is obvious great. She can be beautiful and do both. Lets get real.

  • andy

    I would NEVER want her teaching my girls. Children look up to their teachers, who wants their daughter trying to imitate this woman? Anyone who says its not a big deal, imagine this was your child stripping naked and bending over for the camera.

  • Ricardo Martinez

    The problem might be that mothers were probably jealous of the attention from their husbands the hotty teacher was sure to attract. Then, for a 23 year-old girl who knows she’s hot but she will not be hot forever, what is she supposed to do with some terrible eroticism this girl no doubt possesses? It seems to me that we in the States are still too Puritanical to accept young woman’s erotic drives.