The Bureaucratic Jungle: Why Our Military’s Problems Won’t Get Better

Posted in Politics
Mon, Jul 14 - 9:00 am EST | 1 year ago by
Comments: 48
Share This Post:
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

“It ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.”
~ Machiavelli, The Prince

Lines of Depature - Tom Kratman

This column is about why the things I’ve been complaining about in the last several columns (such as our soldiers’ preposterous loads) are unlikely to get better.

But first, a story, a true story as it happens, and, better still, a personal one:

Some people thought there were stars in my future. I had my doubts, but some people seemed to think it likely. Not everyone was like my uncle who predicted, when I was three or so, that I’d either end up on the faculty of the War College or hang in an elevator shaft at Leavenworth.1

There came a day, early 1988, I was on my second company command, of three,2 and I was shooting the crap with the brigade commander in his office. Though I’d started my military career with considerable ambition, I’d been ambivalent about stars for some time by then. Still, it was a very amorphous thing. I couldn’t have told you why I was losing interest. I’m not even sure I understood that I was. Eventually, I realized that my brigade commander (Annapolis, oddly enough) was trying to mentor me into stars. “You need to do this, Tom, then you need to do that. Then you need to…”

And it all came clear, an epiphany, a blinding flash of the obvious, and I said, “Sir, I don’t want to be a general.”

“Wha… what… WHAT!?”

Yeah, it was kind of news to me, too.

Anyway, I stood up, walked across the office to his LCE tree,3 and took his kevlar helmet in my hands, brim (they had brims, back then) facing away… “Sir, do you remember General Meyer?” I asked.

“Shy Meyer? Chief of Staff of the Army Meyer?”

“Yes, sir, him.”

“Sure.”

“Sir, Meyer was a reformer. He had a bag full of good ideas for improving the Army. I counted 37 once, about half and half trivial and important. I may have missed some.”

“Yes, so?”

Then I turned the helmet around to point at him the two silly bits of glow in the dark tape on the camouflage band around the helmet. “Sir, of all that, of all Meyer’s reforms, this is all that’s left. Everything else is gone. In a matter of a few years – it’s only been a few years since he retired – it’s as if he never existed.”

“You know, you’re right.”

“Yes, sir, I know. So what, sir, would be the point of becoming a general, if — even if I rose to be Chief of Staff of the Army, which would never happen — I could not possibly have a good and lasting effect?”

That, by the way, with a little input from Mohammad (PBUH), is in good part why I eventually ended up turning to writing. Just because my ambition for personal advancement foundered on the shoals of realism doesn’t mean I stopped caring.

“It’s a jungle out there.”
~ Rodney Dangerfield

Rodney didn’t know the half of it.

Let me describe for you la jungla; the jungle, the real, deep, dark, triple-canopy, perpetually dusky except when darker than three feet up a well digger’s butt at midnight, rain-drenched, monkey-howling, homicidal vampire mosquito blood-draining, ant highway-building, black palm-stabbing, scorpion-crawling, skin fungus-breeding and, last but by no means least, chigger-infested jungle.4

Almost nothing grows at ground level but big tree trunks. After all, no sun to speak of gets through except where people have carved roads, or carved out slash and burn plots to farm.

Almost all the nutrients are up in the trees, rather than in the soil, which is the other reason people have to slash and burn. The rain is immense and the sun is intense.

Overhead, the branches intertwine, in layers – up to three of them, hence the name, “triple canopy” – to keep all the sun for themselves. Each of the trees had formed every other tree adjoining it, limiting its shape and scope, even as those adjoining trees limit its.

You want to change the jungle? Go ahead, cut a tree down at the base. Alas, it doesn’t fall; all those intertwined branches keep it in place for quite a while. Okay, send your engineers into the trees; cut those intertwining branches; use a piece of heavy equipment to pull a tree down.

What happens then? A new tree grows into the old spot, very quickly. The other trees will also fill in the gap a bit. But they do so more or less evenly and the new tree grows into the same basic shape as the old. Then the branches start intertwining. In a short time – short as time is measured in the eternal jungle – you couldn’t tell that anything ever changed at all.

If you want to change the jungle, you must raze the jungle or poison it over a broad area. And even then, the objective conditions – rain, sun and soil, plus seeds in the ground – pretty much guarantee that a new jungle will grow to replace the old one, eventually, even as a new tree, almost indistinguishable from its predecessor, grew to replace the one you cut down.

A bureaucracy is a jungle.

An army is largely a bureaucracy, as is a navy, marine corps, or air force. As is a department or ministry of defense (or defence), that oversees them.

And that is why reform fails. Chop the base from a section of bureaucracy. Yep, the other sections it deals with will hold it up for quite a while. It might even grow new roots because no tree is as resilient as a bureaucracy. Look at it more carefully and see where it’s being held up. Cut those intertwining branches first and then cut it off at the base and haul it down. The other bureaucratic departments just expand to fill the gap and, since they do so imperfectly, a new bureaucracy, almost indistinguishable for the old, grows in the place of the one you (think you) got rid of. Even, then, though, no bureaucratic capability, if that’s quite the right term, has gone away. Neither has the expense.

And even if you razed it completely, did away with the whole Department of Defense and all the branches, and then tried to rebuild it in some better form, the environmental factors – mission, money, personnel, the country’s whole ethos and world view, politicians and press, to name a few – all would work together just like seeds, sun, soil and rain (and not obviously any more intelligently than those, either) to recreate exactly what you thought you got rid of. Eventually.

Although since worldly permanence is an illusion, or more likely a delusion, the time between now and eventually can be quite valuable. So… anybody have a large quantity of bureaucratic and departmental herbicide?

__________

1 Imagine my relief when I got orders to Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania and realized I would not, after all, have to hang. Oh, yeah, it’s true, the hangings were done in elevator shafts.

2 At 371 mo-fos, counting me and the sergeant major but not the colonel, this company was nearly a battalion in itself. With attachments I used to go over 400. It was a lot of fun, actually.

3 Just about all commanders have these, a homemade framework of 2x4s to hang your sweaty helmet and your wet, stinking load bearing equipment on to a) dry out, and b) be easy to get to, to put on.

4 The Army is trying to pretend that it’s resurrected the Jungle School in Hawaii. It’s preposterous nonsense.

Tom Kratman is a retired infantry lieutenant colonel, recovering attorney, and science fiction and military fiction writer. His latest novel, The Rods and the Axe, is available from Amazon.com for $9.99 for the Kindle version, or $25 for the hardback. A political refugee and defector from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, he makes his home in Blacksburg, Virginia. He holds the non-exclusive military and foreign affairs portfolio for EveryJoe. Tom’s books can be ordered through baen.com.

Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

Related Posts

  • Harry_the_Horrible

    All I can think of is the Army’s reluctance in the mid-late 19th century to adopt magazine fed repeating rifles because the bean counter thought it would encourage soldiers to waste expensive ammo.

    • Tom Kratman

      That was just idiocy. Idiocy is easier to cure.

    • Jason75

      Hanging or crucifixion?

    • Tom Kratman

      Neither is actually a cure.

    • Jason75

      That’s true.

      Is there no way to free the military from the bureaucracy?

    • Tom Kratman

      Free? No. Reduce? Maybe. But the bureaucracy isn’t the problem. The jungle grows where the conditions are rights. Our conditions are our entire society.

    • TimP

      Yep, I periodically have an idea for a at least possibly good reform to one of our current institutions, and then I look at the society the institutions would have to be built on, and I remember why the improved institutions don’t already exist.

    • snowfarthing

      Although I’m a so-called anarcho-capitalist, this is the biggest reason why I’m also a registered Republican: there’s no way we’re removing all our government institutions and replacing them with private actors and contract law any time soon.

      And by “any time soon” I’m thinking “any time in the next two or three generations, if ever”.

      Heck, this is the biggest reason why, even though I’m convinced that morally, we should have had a violent revolution against our own government decades ago, if we had a revolution even today, it would most likely result in a loss of freedoms. After all, what are we going to do once we win the revolution–hold a vote? Ha! We already do that every two years! Set up a dictator that’s going to enforce libertarianism on everyone? Good luck finding someone who is so liberty-minded that they can help us value our freedoms, without becoming so corrupt themselves that they end up destroying the freedoms they were allegedly trying to protect.

      Even something as simple as restoring our Constitutional freedoms (which, now that I think about it, means slash-and-burn of most of the current functions of our Federal Government, and probably a good portion on State governments as well) is going to require a cultural change of some sort…

    • Tom Kratman

      I read something recently on ESR’s Armed and Dangerous, I think it was, that struck me as fairly profound. It was to the effect that libertarianism is a _critique_ of society, not a blueprint for one.

      Your points are pretty well taken, too, if I’m reading you right. You recognize the difference between, “Gee, wouldn’t it be nice,” and, “But that’s not the world we live in.”

    • snowfarthing

      I wouldn’t quite say that “it’s not the world we live in” so much as “it’s not the culture we live in”. I wasn’t convinced that anarcho-capitalism would work until I learned that it *did* work in Medieval Iceland.

      The other thing that surprised me, was the realization that, with enough time and energy, we could start putting to practice anarcho-capitalistic principles into practice today. This realization came when I attended a city council meeting to protest a truancy bill that would affect home-schoolers, and a follow-up meeting to discuss what went right and what went wrong. I learned that if a group wanted to get city council to notice them, all they have to do is send a representative to the meeting every week. After a while, the councilmen would ask “Who are you, and what do you want from us?” because they are very attentive about who is watching them…

      But the key is, this requires time and energy, and both are of short supply for me at this moment. But it’s possible; and I’m convinced that Libertarians as a movement aren’t going to get much momentum until they get their act together at the local level, rather than try to go for the big, high-profile offices.

      Which brings us back to libertarianism being a critique of society, rather than a means of reforming society. It’s easier to be intellectual about things, than it is to go in and create a mass movement….

    • akulkis

      And throughout World War I, both the RAF and U.S. aviation units refused to issue parachutes “because we don’t want pilots jumping out of their aeroplanes every time someone shoots at them.” The Germans were the first to wise up, and started issuing parachutes to aircraft pilots and other crewmen late in the war. But both sides lost tremendous numbers of men who died in the wreckage of planes, or sometimes burned to death before they hit the ground, for want of a parachute.

  • Mike Harris

    I’m going to read this out loud at my retirement ceremony, but not until they’ve pinned my LOM on me.

    • Tom Kratman

      Good plan.

    • carolynggarcia

      my buddy’s sister makes $87 every hour on the internet
      . She has been unemployed for 6 months but last month her payment was $19402
      just working on the internet for a few hours. go right here C­a­s­h­f­i­g­.­C­O­M­

  • Doc Krin

    TK:
    Maybe you and John G. Hemry need to collaborate on a novel? (considering the thrust of his “Ethan Stark” trilogy…)
    ck

    • Tom Kratman

      Note from Little Tommy’s First Grade Report Card: “Does NOT pay well with others.”

    • Jamie Robertson

      You certainly played well with John Ringo, though, in “Yellow Eyes” and “Wacht am Rein” ;)

    • Tom Kratman

      Nope. Those are not collabs – not even written to an outline – and both names on front were Jim Baen’s marketing strategy. We tried to collab, to an outline John wrote. In a year, a whole year, I’d managed to get down 14000 words, every one of which I hated separately but equally. Note, I have written as much as a million words a year…but always my own stuff. We finally gave up on that because I just couldn’t write to someone else’s outline.

  • Ori Pomerantz

    So absent cultural change or an existential war things will keep getting worse, and there is little we can do to change it? Makes sense.

    Our wars do tend to be existential to the other side, so they’re likely to exhibit more flexibility. :-(

    • Tom Kratman

      “Depend upon it, sir; when man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight it concentrates his mind wonderfully.” –Samuel Johnson

  • Neil

    This is why I’m often terrified for my children’s future.

    It’s not the bureaucracy–they Army’s been bad that way since Washington’s retirement speech. Today’s procurement follies are no worse, as a proportion of GDP, than what’s gone before.

    It’s the feeling that, to continue your jungle analogy, the climate has changed. That the jungle flora are no longer so perfectly suited for the location, and that they need to be removed so that something better can grow instead. That those big trees with their interlocking branches are preventing the growth of new species that would be adapted to the new environment, and all the while the jungle is slowly dying. Until one day, a storm comes (that the jungle would have weathered in better days) and flattens the whole thing with one good shove…

    • Tom Kratman

      The bureaucracy is the expression of all the other things. It’s cause, yes, but also symptom. And a pretty good illustration of why reform fails.

    • akulkis

      This is how to win an argument with any leftist.

      Ask them if they think military procurement is good, or one of the sorriest, most corrupt messes on the planet.

      They will, of course, say that’s it’s a corrupt mess.

      Then, ask them to give examples of the corruption and abuses. When they start to slow down, encourage them to continue.

      When they’re finally finished, ask them about the sort of regimented life that military people live (including, at times, being told when they can and cannot relieve themselves).

      Again, encourage them to talk at length about how bad it is.

      When their done with that, then ask them — so, why in the **** do you want to run our economy like our military procurement system, and why do YOU want to live under all of the sorts of petty rules and regulations that a private in the army or marine corps does? You really don’t think that YOU’RE such a special snowflake that the rules won’t apply to you, too, do you.

      At that point, you’ve won, as they have absolutely no response to it.

  • David Willis

    And here we have the main reason I left Active Duty for the Reserves (besides a battalion commander who made micromanagement seem like a refreshing alternative to his command style). Intransigent, idiotic bureaucracy I can deal with 2 days a month, but 365 days a year? I’d be in that elevator shaft…

    • Tom Kratman

      Assholes come and go; the bureaucracy is with us forever.

    • David Willis

      Sadly, they’re often the same people (shudder).

    • akulkis

      One reason I liked being in combat maneuver units in the national guard… combat arms units tend to attract far FEWER (but by no means none at all) bureaucratic, micromanaging idiots.

    • annajkramer

      my classmate’s half-sister makes $73 an hour on the computer . She has
      been out of work for seven months but last month her check was $19134 just
      working on the computer for a few hours. navigate to this web-site C­a­s­h­f­i­g­.­C­O­M­

  • Iron Spartan

    The only way that the modern American military will be forced to reform in ways that reflect reality instead of current social trends is if it faces a serious threat and if it starts to lose, and lose in a big enough way that it can’t be hidden.

    The thought of the amount of my brother’s blood that will be spilled to before things will change makes me sick. What makes me even sicker is that even if reforms were made at the cost of so much blood, I doubt they would last a single generation.

    • Tom Kratman

      The timing of that would be exceptionally tricky to pull off….

    • akulkis

      Look what happened with the Red Army in the “Winter War” with Finland (1939?)

      Took 100:1 losses invading Finland, who had no armor to speak of (about 3 dozen vehicles), the Red Army LOST over 1000 armored vehicles, mostly to molotov cocktails.

      Still, their doctrine didn’t change.

      Then in light of the losses in the opening stages of the German invasion in 1941(*), and throughout the summer, there was no change in doctrine.. it was only when Leningrad, Moscow, and Stalingrad were being threatened that significant doctrinal changes occurred, and the political commisars (which infested the army all the way down to every company, and who had the authority to veto ANY order by the formation commander, but with no corresponding responsibility for the results of their decisions) were finally relieved of their authority, and reduced to the role of propaganda agents.

      (*) even though it appears the Red Army themselves were preparing to invade the German-occupied half of Poland, as well as Bulgaria and Hungary — Soviet shipments of ammunion, etc to the German-held stockyards were so high that the stockyards became almost inoperable — the local Poles believe that what was happening was that the Red Army was planning to seize those very same rail-yards, and thus what looked like a flood of supply to their German customers was actually the building of Red Army supply points on Germany’s dime.

  • Alexander Macris

    At least our civilian bureaucracy is more organized and less corrupt. If both our military and civilian infrastructure were a bureaucratic jungle that needed to be burned to the ground, our country would be in dire peril!

    What…you say our civilian bureaucracy is actually worse? Oh. Oh, man.

    • Tom Kratman

      Yeah…we’re so screwed.

    • Ori Pomerantz

      On the other hand, the civilian bureaucracy isn’t really running the country. The country is mostly run by organizations such as WalMart and Target who DO face competition and do have to be somewhat efficient. The government just handles a few of the functions required to keep civilization going.

    • TBR

      But those organizations often leverage the corruptness of the political system to game the market to their undeserved advantage (cynically often under the “free market” pretense). Look at what happens to them if they stray into markets where they face true competition.

    • Ori Pomerantz

      To an extent – but there are still enough of them they have to also compete, as well as disruptive technologies until they are regulated. It is an imperfect system, but much better than letting our government run more of the country.

    • akulkis

      Oh, yes they are running the country. 2 months ago, they shut down the last lead-smelter in the country. What do you think that does to ammunition prices (for both the public and the government).

    • akulkis

      Under the czars, the Russians had a system by which government bureacrats received ZERO salary. They were expected to make their living off of bribes.

      To tell you the truth, at this point, I think it would be an improvement over what we have now. For one, whoever is willing to pay the most for XYZ action is probably the person who is going to be the most economically productive as a result. Right now, we have a civilian bureaucracy filled with people who think that they can utterly eradicate the non-government economy and have a healthier economy in the end (as opposed to the moribound, black-market-dominated economy which will actually result).

    • Longwalker

      One of the first “reforms” the Federal legislators enacted was to take the civil servants/government officials off the “fee system” and put them on salary. That meant a semi-market operation and less arrogance.

  • Mick Warshaw

    There is nothing so permanent as a temporary government program. (I forget if Reagan or Friedman said this first)

    • Tom Kratman

      It was probably Pericles, but someone neglected to write his words down….well…him or Cheops.

  • Mick Warshaw
  • Jack Withrow

    Col, Are you taking this topic further in later columns? I ask, because the idiocy has infected not just the upper echelons of leadership; it has now gotten down to the Company level in a lot of cases. It used to be there was some insulation from it at Bde and Div HQ, but the stupidity now originates from those HQ’s now, and pretty soon Bn and Co HQ’s will be requiring their own special brand stupidity soon.

    • Tom Kratman

      I think this is it for this one, Jack.

  • Douglas Moore

    It’s actually difficult to describe with words what it’s like to work everyday in this type of bureaucracy. All I can say is that it eats your soul. There’s always an argument for one more rule, regulation, DA Form, hour of online training. Always will be. But by the time you’ve finished your day, you’ve accomplished little of import. And then driven, intelligent people go home wondering why they’re putting up with all the difficulties of military life for this. This will be my last contract term, for sure.

  • gailimann

    my Aunty Allison recently got a nice 6
    month old Jaguar by working from a macbook.this website C­a­s­h­f­i­g­.­C­O­M­

  • barbarampons

    my classmate’s aunt makes $68 every hour on the
    computer . She has been fired for 7 months but last month her paycheck was
    $15495 just working on the computer for a few hours. visit the site C­a­s­h­f­i­g­.­C­O­M­

  • Anthony

    Bureaucracy is unavoidable because we are human and cannot
    escape being human. After all making things more complicated and difficult is
    human nature. Can you name any nation or culture that is not afflicted with a
    soul crushing demoralizing bureaucracy? I’m sure Khufu’s had a tremendous
    bureaucracy to deal with as he built his pyramid. Other bureaucracy’s may be
    less pervasive than our current one but it’s not hard to imagine a bureaucracy
    creeping and growing over a few decades after all bureaucracy begets bureaucracy.
    I suspect that physics has a term for when all activity stops due to terminal bureaucratic
    mass being reached. So why rage against the dying of the light? Drink the kool-aid
    the waters fine.

Share This Post:
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Twitter