âWe interrupt our regularly scheduled programmingâŠâ1
The Bergdahl Case.
Caveat 1: I am not a JAG. I have never been a JAG. I have never wanted to be a JAG. Iâm just a grunt with a law degree.
Caveat 2: Iâm not the finder of fact in the Bergdahl case. I havenât seen whatâs going to be introduced into evidence. It would be inappropriate for me â and itâs not a lot better for you â to comment on questions of innocence or guilt.
Those things being said, I think â I sense â that, across wide swaths of the country, many people simply donât understand the seriousness of the charges. Fewer still understand the appropriateness of the maximum penalties. The maximum penalty for desertion in wartime? Death.2 The maximum penalty for misbehavior before the enemy? Death.3 Whether capital punishment had been ruled off the table I do not know. Whether ruling it out was offered as part of a plea agreement I cannot say. The Washington Postâs article on the case doesnât fill me with confidenceâŠin The Washington Post.4
Death? Why we rarely give death in these enlightened times to axe murdering child rapists. Death? Surely youâre kidding, Kratman.
No. Military law is different. For example, though Bergdahl isnât charged with mutiny, to understand the difference look at this, Article 94, Uniform Code of Military Justice, Mutiny or Sedition:
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who–
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
Now look at those lines I highlighted. Any idea what they mean? Look to that key word, âutmost.â That means anything up to and including deadly force, which is to say, in effect, summary execution. Summary execution? When USS Constellation fought the French ship, LâInsurgent, in 1799, she lost one man. A member of a gun crew âflinched from his gun,â and was duly shot by the third lieutenant to whose division he belonged.5 When I think of âflinched from his gun,â I see, in my mindâs eye, a young sailor — quite probably a teenager — understandably scared to death, crawling to what he imagines is the safest part of the gun deck, then covering his head with his arms and weeping like a lost soul, right up until his lieutenant blows his brains out with his pistol. Wait; you did know that officers and military police arenât issued pistols solely for their personal convenience, right?
And that wasnât even mutiny, which is far more serious. Indeed, mutiny is so serious that you can be executed merely for failure to do anything up to and including summary execution to suppress one.
Again, military law is different.
Everyoneâs heard this Groucho Marxism: âMilitary justice is to justice as military music is to music.â6 Iâm sure that everyone, or nearly everyone, also takes that in the precise sense that Groucho meant it, that military justice and military music are both primitive and bad, especially in comparison to civilian versions. Groucho, however, along with those who agree with him, are wrong in several particulars. Somewhat trivially, I defy someone to defend a claim that Beethovenâs “Yorcksche Marsch”7 is either primitive or bad, especially in comparison to, oh, say, âMove bitch, get out the way, Get out the way, bitch, get out the way.â8 Even as I smile over that little paean to the traffic jam, I note that the US military was requiring what amounts to Miranda Warnings long before the Supreme Court required them, generally.
In another â much more important â sense, though, it is true; âMilitary justice is to justice as military music is to musicâ because both military justice and military music serve the needs of war, which is to say the needs of the organizations that wage war and of the states that raise and support those organizations. We have shot a man who flinched from his gun. We have hanged people for mutiny after not even the briefest of trials, and found that the commanding officer hanged them for good and sufficient reason.9 We have shot deserters, as well.10 We have done these things because of the needs of war, and out of a desire to do justice to our country, her people, and the Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines who stand to defend her.
“[I]t is good to kill an admiral from time to time, in order to encourage the others”
~ Voltaire, Candide
Pity about Voltaire, really; like most intellectuals he was convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that he understood perfectly some things he did not understand at all, hence sometimes could not learn. I can be a slow learner about some things; itâs true, but, at least, I can learn. Eventually. In this case, it was several months into my second company command (of three), and in the process of thinking about some non-judicial punishment I was about to offer a wayward troop, in lieu of court martial, when I suddenly realized that we donât punish miscreants to encourage anybody.11 Neither do we punish to deter, for the most part, though the punishments we award may deter. Nor even do we generally punishÂ â at least in the militaryÂ â to rehabilitate, or to disable. No, the mass of the men canât be deterred, or not very much, by any of things we can do to them, and certainly even less by what we do to others. If they were that weak in character theyâd be fairly useless to us.
What does happen, though, is that when bad conduct is, in effect, condoned by failure to punish, we demoralize the others. We make them feel that their righteous conduct is valueless. We make them feel that theyâre suckers for toeing the line. Looked at another way, the soldier doesnât stand in line of battle, risking his life as he does so, because you might shoot him if he runs. He stays there because his own self-respect demands it. If, however, you fail to shoot those who do run away, then you disentangle his self-respect from his duty, and then he might run, as might a few score â or a few million â others.
Is this irrational? WellâŠ
“A rational army would run away.”
~ Charles de Secondat, baron de Montesquieu
âBuâ buâ butâŠreasonable fear! Lack of mens rea! Broken home! Children at home! PTSD!ââŠthose, or any of a million modern and not so modern contrivances mean nothing. So what? Military justice is not about justice to the individual, except insofar as itâs necessary to make every soldier doing his duty feel that heâs not subject to arbitrary whim and that, if he does his duty, he will not be subject to the shame of criminal trial. Military justice is what is necessary to obtain justice â which is to say, solid battlefield performance â from our combat forces and to obtain justice â which is to say, victorious survival â for our country.
âBuâ buâ butâŠitâs unjust! It must be changed!â Change war first â and you canât â or see the country go under, eventually, due to inability to field a battleworthy military.
So, in summation, while I will not comment on Bergdahlâs guilt or innocence (and neither should you), should he be found guilty, and should he be sentenced to death â as he should be, if found guilty â and should the Army go for a more traditional form of execution, then the Army need look no further for someone to command the firing squad and â however reluctantly â to administer the Coup de Grace. On the other hand, thatâs a forlorn offer. If Bergdahl were to be found guilty and sentenced to a more traditional death, there will be about fifty thousand volunteers for the job, and at least four hundred thousand volunteers to man the firing squad.
1 Iâll renew the discussion of China and war in a week. This, however, seems timely.
6 Also sometimes attributed to Clemenceau or even Voltaire.
10 Most recently: http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-execution-of-eddie-slovik-is-authorized
11 The precise circumstance was seeing that a previously punished troop was on hands and knees, where Top had set him, scrubbing the tile in the hallway in the orderly room. It was very public. As an aside, I never acquired a taste for giving out much NJP, and, in my smaller rifle company, rarely did, preferring to arrange things so my non-coms could handle most problems: âYou see, boys, when your sergeant drops you for pushups, or puts you to work on something after hours, heâs paying you a kind of mild compliment. In effect, heâs saying, âWell, I could take you to the CO who would rip you a new one and bust your ass to boot. But Iâll give you this voluntary way out of that.â You need not, of course, accept his kind offer, but in that caseâŠ.â
However, on the second company command, a mechanized infantry battalion Headquarters and Headquarters Company, three hundred and seventy-two mo-fos counting everybody but the colonel, and with most of the company being considerably more REMFish than my previous command, a rifle company, and with somewhat less stout leadership, a certain amount of NJP was unavoidable.
Tom Kratman is a retired infantry lieutenant colonel, recovering attorney, and science fiction and military fiction writer. His latest novel, The Rods and the Axe, is available from Amazon.com for $9.99 for the Kindle version, or $25 for the hardback. A political refugee and defector from the Peopleâs Republic of Massachusetts, he makes his home in Blacksburg, Virginia. He holds the non-exclusive military and foreign affairs portfolio for EveryJoe. Tom’s books can be ordered through baen.com.
Note: If you follow the retail links in this post and make purchases on the site(s), Defy Media may receive a share of the proceeds from your sale through the retailer’s affiliate program.
Don’t miss Tom Kratman’s other Lines of Departure columns. Click through the gallery below to read more.
Social JusticeDon't miss this three-part series on our social justice armed forces.
Photo by zabelin/Getty Images
Women in the MilitaryShould women be required to register for the draft? Step right up, ladies!
Photo by Getty Images
The KurdsTom Kratman sounds off on our gallant allies, the Kurds, and other fairy tales.
Photo by John Moore/Getty Images
Sorry RodneyTom Kratman explores Islam and why we just can't get along. Read Part I, II and III of this series.
Photo by Retrovizor/Getty Images
Service Guarantees CitizenshipRead this three-part series from Tom Kratman, inspired by Starship Troopers: Part I, II and III.
Photo by Marko Marcello/Getty Images
ImmigrationTom Kratman explores why immigration doesn't work like it used to.
Gun-Free ZonesTom Kratman discusses military gun-free zones and the ill-logic of the Left.
Dear GermanyRead this open letter to Germany regarding the "refugee" crisis.
Photo by Adam Berry/Getty Images