Thursday, in a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court handed down a decision that upholds health insurance subsidies set up from federal exchanges. This flies in the face of the Affordable Care Act’s actual wording, which states that subsidies will only be available in exchanges on the state level.
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images
But now, thanks to the King v. Burwell ruling, “state level” now means “federal level” too. How that leap of logic made by Justice Roberts was performed – for the second time on the ACA – is a performance that would put most Olympic long jumpers to shame.
Speaking for the majority, Roberts said that “The Court nevertheless must do its best, ‘bearing in mind the fundamental canon of statutory construction that the words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.’”
Translated, Roberts means that if a bill has – as he puts it, “inartful wording” – then it’s up to the Supreme Court to fill in the blanks. That if a bill is written in such a way that causes it to fail, then the Supreme Court should rule on it in such a way that will make it work.
Wording be damned, and why not? Words apparently have little meaning now. If “state” is a malleable term, then what else can be in the future? And if I’m asking that question, then you can be pretty sure someone in the legislature is too. What’s scarier is that those definitions can be determined by whichever way the wind is blowing at the time, turning the Supreme Court into a partisan playground.
This is best explained by Scalia himself, who dissented…vehemently.
“Perhaps the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will attain the enduring status of the Social Security Act or the Taft-Hartley Act; perhaps not. But this Courtâ€™s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (‘penalty’ means tax, ‘further [Medicaid] payments to the State’ means only incremental Medicaid payments to the State, ‘established by the State’ means not established by the State) will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence. And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.”
Justice Scalia’s dissent should be taken to heart. It was one of the few things that came out of the ruling that didn’t sound like it came from the Mad Hatter’s tea party. While I enjoyed his words – which really should be read at length – they’re frightening in the regard that the Supreme Court can, and is, deciding how they want the story to play out by helping craft the legislation they rule on.
Hailing from Austin, Texas, Brandon Morse has been writing about politics and culture across many websites for the last six years, with a heavy emphasis on anti-authoritarianism. Aside from writing articles, he is also known for voice acting and authoring scripts. He is an avid gamer, dog person, and has a bad habit of making vague references to things no one has heard about or seen. Follow him at @TheBrandonMorse on Twitter.
Click through the gallery below to read more from Morse in his previous EveryJoe columns:
FreedomWe all want safety, but freedom isn't safe.
Photo by Roman Slavik/Getty Images
Cologne AttacksWhen it comes to the horrific attacks in Cologne, where are the feminists with their outrage?
Photo by Sascha Schuermann/Getty Images
College ProtestsShame these social justice obsessed students, shame their professors more.
Photo: â€śBauer sanbernardinoâ€ť. Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.5 via Wikipedia
Political LeaningsThe political spectrum is a line not a graph.
Photo by Pablographix / Getty Images
Free SpeechFree speech will win, whether you like it or not.
Photo by benjaminec/Getty Images
Gun ControlThere are many things that we can take away from this buried Harvard gun control study.
Photo by Bytmonas/Getty Images
Note to Internet FeministsThereâ€™s always some third-waver going on about how sheâ€™s the victim of the worst kinds of behavior from the denizens of the world wild web. Take note -- the internet isn't always nice.
Photo by Volkan Analan / Getty Images
Don't Ignore ThemConservatives need to stop ignoring famous dumb people.
Photo by Jacob Wackerhausen / Getty Images
Feminine vs FeminismMany strong women are rejecting the weak ideas of today's feminists.
Photo by IPGGutenbergUKLtd/Getty Images
Hillary is Not Rand Paulâ€™s Problem, Bernie IsTo get his campaign back on track, Rand Paul needs to put a message out to those libertarians who are currently being fooled by Bernie Sandersâ€™ rhetoric.
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images