The double-standards that run rampant on the left are revealing themselves yet again; this time around an issue that liberals love to pretend they have a monopoly on: the environment. This latest bout of hypocrisy surrounds the fact that just weeks ago, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released approximately three million gallons of acidic waste into a Colorado river, underestimated the environmental and economic impact of their mistake, and even failed to alert affected state government officials and the public about the dangerous situation a timely fashion.
But you probably havenāt seen photographs of this now-hazardous river plastered across the front pages of newspapers ad nauseam the way you did the BP gulf coast oil spill. To the extent that the polluted Animas River has been on TV, itās as a side note; in contrast for example, to the airtime the Exxon-Valdez oil spill in Alaska received. Yes, those spills were bigger scale-wise. That doesnāt change the fact however, that the coverage and accountability disparity when it comes to corporate versus government pollution sheds an unflattering light on the left and their sympathetic media allies. Still, the responsibility and competency problems are much bigger than just that.
As Governor Susanna Martinez of New Mexico (which was one of the states impacted by the EPAās recent negligence) said, āThis was caused by the EPA, and the EPA should demand the same of itself as it would of a private business responsible for such a spill, particularly when it comes to making information available to the public and state and local officials.ā As critics and impacted groups have noted, the EPAās disastrous post-incident response has been nothing short of outrageous, if not outright dangerous.
āEPA compounded its gross negligence by failing to inform city and state officials or residents and recreationists on the river for a full 24 hours after the event,ā reported The American Spectatorās H. Sterling Burnett. āThatās 24 hours farmers were irrigating with tainted water, cities were pumping dirty water for municipal uses, and kayakers and anglers were literally standing or floating in the toxic brew. Some mayors of cities first learned of the danger from news reports, not the EPA itself.ā
Despite the harm caused to affected persons, most Americans are at best, tangentially aware of the Animas River and the toxins that have turned a previously usable body of water into a bright orange disaster. And as far as the environmentalist left is concerned, that ignorance of this serious situation is by design. In fact, the President of the United States himself wants you to ignore the EPAās egregious mistake, for which interestingly enough, they arenāt being held accountable by his administration. But itās all for the sake of āprogress,ā of course.
The most recent emails sent out by Obamaās grassroots outfit provide a strong clue as to the reasoning behind White House officialsā tight lips. Maligning anyone who would dare question the wisdom of giving the unaccountable and apparently incompetent EPA even more power in the wake of this incident as āscience deniers,ā Obamaās Organizing For Action sent out a characteristically condescending call-to-action mere days after the EPA tainted a beautiful river with several million gallons of toxic sludge:
You don’t have to be a policy expert to make a difference on climate change. All it takes is a willingness to fight back — especially against deniers that willfully ignore the science.
Now that the Clean Power Plan is finalized, it’s the states’ turn to take action, and state leaders need your support to keep the momentum going.
States all over the country are already acting to meet their clean power goals. Nevada is helping lead the nationwide solar boom — between 2013 and 2014, the number of solar jobs in Nevada grew by 146 percent. Iowa, Kansas, and South Dakota each get at least a fifth of their power from clean wind energy. New York is part of a nine-state partnership that has created jobs and boosted the regional economy, all while cutting consumers’ utility bills by hundreds of millions of dollars and cutting carbon pollution by 40 percent.
That kind of leadership is needed in the weeks to come, during the hard push to meet the EPA’s goals — and OFA volunteers are stepping up in support.
Say you’ll stand with strong leadership on climate change:
National Issues Campaign Manager
Organizing for Actionā
Well. That explains the sound of chirping crickets emanating from Pennsylvania Avenue. The White House is too busy trying to ram its latest EPA-led economically damaging centralized scheme down our throats to bother pursuing what should be governmentās basic function: holding all entities, including its own agencies, accountable for endangering the health and livelihood of American citizens.
If OFA and the environmental left had even a shred of credibility, they would be calling for investigations and mass firings. Instead, theyāre twiddling their thumbs at best, and mostly engaging in outright excuse-making. As Burnett wrote at The American Spectator: āIf a private company had caused this disaster, federal and state officials would already be talking about criminal investigations, and civil suits would be filed claiming billions in damages. Heads would be rolling. By contrast, although EPA may transfer some of the people who supervised the disastrous operation, itās likely few, if any, of its employees will be fired or forced to resign.ā
And disappointingly but unsurprisingly, the usual suspects are running defense for an EPA that should be investigated and reorganized, not praised and expanded. The Washington Times compiled an illuminating roundup of reactions to the Animas River tragedy from environmental organizations invested in centralizing government power as a means to their ends. No one should be shocked by their double standards, but we should certainly call them on it.
Courtesy of the Washington Timesā Valerie Richardson:
The Sierra Club Rocky Mountain chapter posted a link to an article titled ā9 things you need to know about the Animas River spill.ā The list includes āThe EPA messed up, but theyāre not the root causeā and āThis isnāt the first time this has happened, nor is it the worst.ā
āBlaming the EPA for #AnimasRiver spill is like blaming a doctor for the disease,ā Conservation Colorado said in a Wednesday tweet.ā
Really? These groups want us to believe that the āmining companies and their practicesā are at the root of this problem when the Gold King Mine stopped its operations in 1923 and somehow, no damage was caused since until EPA employees unplugged a sufficiently blockaded source of pollution?
This is of course not to say that companies ought to have the right to pollute. They donāt. And they should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law in accordance with a respect for property rights. But environmental groups ought to take their ideological blinders off and recognize the dangerous double standard theyāre enabling when they make excuses for the EPAās negligence.
To the extent that the EPA isnāt being held accountable as a private company in the same situation would, conservatives are bolstered in our argument that strong definitions of property rights and a small watchdog-sized government to enforce them are pro-environment policies. When government holds too much centralized power, thereās a built-in disincentive to pursue internal accountability measures. This ultimately hurts victims of their negligence the most.
In the wake of this tragedy, the EPA and its allies could sure use a wake-up call. If the Navajo Nation, which has been severely impacted by this pollution, follows through on their threat to sue, the EPA sure will have earned it. As Jonathan Lockwood of the free market advocacy group Advancing Colorado said:
āThis environmental disaster is just one more example of why people do not trust the job-killing EPA and we have every right to question why our hard-earned money is going to such an incompetent and mismanaged government agency. This is now a multi-state issue, and people have every right to be absolutely outraged with the EPA, and the officials who continue to provide support and cover for this agency.ā
Clearly, itās more than past time to hold the government to the same standards they hold us to.
Corie Whalen Stephens is a libertarian-conservative activist and writer based in Houston, Texas.
Click through the gallery below to read more from Corie.
LibertyThe fight for liberty will always transcend presidential politics.
Photo by rypson/Getty Images
Tea PartyThe tea party is not Trump and not dead, it's just different now.
Photo by Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images
Gun ControlThe gun control debate reveals the fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives.
Photo by STILLFX/Getty Images
LibertyThis Presidential cycle is a reminder that anti-establishment doesn't mean pro-liberty.
Photo by Michael Flippo/Getty Images
RefugeesLet's get past the refugee rhetoric and look at the facts.
Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Election 2016The latest Republican debate marked the end of the Bush dynasty.
Photo by Justin Sullivan / Getty Images
Presidential ElectionIs Marco Rubio ready for his moment? He very well could become the GOP nominee.
Photo by Justin Sullivan / Getty Images
Debate LessonsDid we actually learn anything from the recent long, chaotic Republican debate?
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Identity PoliticsStop expecting conservatives to give up their identities.
Photo by BananaStock/Getty Images
Local PoliticsCorie Whalen-Stephens explore why to win nationally, we need to first act locally.
Photo by LuminaStock / Getty Images
Foreign PolicyA generational gap in foreign policy opinions could spell bad news for Republicans.
Criminal Justice ReformCorie Whalen Stephens discusses how President Obama is finally catching up with libertarians on criminal justice reform.
Photo by Mark Makela/Getty Images
Election 2016Can a Republican Presidential candidate earn the Black vote?
Donald TrumpDefending Donald Trump is a contribution to the Democratic party.
Photo by Christopher Gregory/Getty Images
Rand Paul on MarriageSenator Rand Paul, who is known as the most libertarian Republican presidential candidate, believes the government should respect contracts between consenting adults, but stop defining marriage.
Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images
LibertariansRead Corie Whalen Stephens' first article on EveryJoe -- Libertarians Can Stop Worrying and Embrace Rand Paulās Strategy.
Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images