If Trump is Unstoppable, What Happens Next?

Posted in Politics
Thu, Feb 25 - 8:00 am EST | 2 years ago by
Comments: 4
Be Sociable, Share!
    Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

    Corridors of Power - Trump Unstoppable

    It’s time for Republicans to dispense with the wishful thinking. For all the hype about Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, for all the breathless calls to narrow the field, Super Tuesday is in less than a week and Donald Trump is dominant. He has won three out of the four early contests by wide margins, and even though Cruz technically beat him in Iowa, he earned 8 delegates and Trump earned 7. Not exactly a huge difference there.

    New Hampshire was a fluke, we told ourselves. It’s just that Trump appeals to Northeastern moderates given his New York City background. Cruz was able to hold Trump back, even if slightly in evangelical Iowa, so he should be able to do the same in South Carolina, right? And Rubio grew up in Nevada. Surely his connections there and his appeal to Latinos will help him, no? We were wrong. And I fear we will continue to be.

    There are no more excuses to be made. No more hypotheticals to be formulated. Jeb Bush spent $150 million, failed to crack into the top three, and dropped out after the third contest. Rubio was endorsed by South Carolina’s Gov. Haley, Sen. Scott and Rep. Gowdy. Cruz is the self-described savior of evangelicals, many of whom populate South Carolina’s rural counties. Yet Trump blew both senators out of the water in a state where it was said they could hold him back.

    Super Tuesday is around the corner and polling shows Trump, once again, dominating. He’s even close to giving Cruz a run for his money in his home state of Texas, where the near entirety of the state’s political machine backs him. We can no longer tell ourselves that the polls overestimate Trump’s support, that his backers aren’t motivated or that he has no ground game. Conventional wisdom has been tossed aside in nearly every possible fashion this cycle. It’s time to face the music.

    We are staring at the very real possibility of a vulgar, narcissistic, Obamacare-loving, Planned Parenthood-supporting, anti-trade, conspiracy-peddling, authoritarian demagogue as the Republican nominee. Realistically, what happens next? Some grassroots libertarians and conservatives, though they disagree with Trump’s policies, believe the Republican Party brought this schadenfreude upon itself and welcome what they see as a necessary destructive force. I wish I agreed with this outlook because I could then convince myself that something good could arise from the ashes. But I just don’t see it that way.

    Hours prior to the Nevada caucus, I wrote a piece at directed toward the libertarians who have embraced the aforementioned operation chaos theory. While I appreciate that they believe a fractured Republican Party could clear a path for much needed liberty leaders, I can’t imagine circumstances heading in that direction. Rather, I tend to believe that Trump would pull the Republican Party further to the left than its establishment already is and that it would stay there for the foreseeable future.

    As I explained, “Donald Trump as president will not usher in some kind of radical change. He will govern as he’s running: A left-wing narcissist with a disturbing record of racist and misogynistic commentary … If Trump were to … become president, we would simply have two Democratic parties: One focused on big government and identity politics for people of color and women, the other, on big government and identity politics for angry, white working class men … Donald Trump would basically be Hillary Clinton with an even bigger ego. Not to mention Trump’s fringe white nationalist supporters, who mimic their leader’s penchant for insulting anyone who dares to dissent, would be emboldened.”

    Perhaps it’s true, as Conor Friedersdorf wrote at The Atlantic, that a portion of the Republican base could mount a third party challenge to Trump if he’s the nominee. As he wrote, “It is hard to imagine any die-hard Bush loyalists supporting Trump after his attacks on Jeb and George. Indeed, it is easy to imagine them delighting in denying Trump the White House. Putting them altogether, that’s quite a diverse anti-Trump coalition.”

    Added Friedersdorf, “If Trump wins, there will be a lot of establishment campaign professionals who’d benefit financially from a third-party challenge by a movement conservative (and who wouldn’t fear being branded disloyal for staffing one).” He also notes that this type of scenario might help down-ballot Republicans who would suffer if conservative voters stayed home absent a decent presidential choice.
    But where exactly does that leave libertarians and conservatives who oppose both the welfare-warfare state mentality of the Bush era and Trump’s racially-animated left-wing economics? In my view, even further behind than we were in the darkness of the post-9/11 era. If our choices are Trump’s borderline fascist Republican Party and a Bush establishment alternative, that doesn’t exactly sound appealing. Some might argue that this fracturing leaves room for a Libertarian Party candidate to make a splash. Maybe? But I don’t think it’s likely.

    In my view, this cycle has unfortunately proven that there’s little to no appetite for that message on a presidential scale right now. Trump sucked up nearly all of Rand Paul’s oxygen. What makes libertarians think the populace wants to listen to Gary Johnson talk about marijuana policy? We have Bernie Sanders for that. And frankly, evidence shows that a lot of left-libertarians, who care primarily about social and foreign policy issues, are already in his camp. When Sanders loses to Hillary, those types most likely won’t vote at all.

    Call me crazy, but for a libertarian, I’m just not that much of a radical. I prefer watching Rand Paul and Justin Amash influence the Republican Party from the inside, working for change in an institutional context. I know that’s not sexy enough for people who want to wield torches and pitchforks, but I think there’s evidence that it’s working – even if the voting populace is busy embracing a demagogue on a presidential level. I fear that with Trump as the GOP nominee, Republicans will lose the Senate handily, and that even the House could be in jeopardy.

    I just see very little good coming out of a Trump nomination, but we do have to start bracing for the reality. I hope my libertarians friends who think the chaos will ultimately help us are right that something good can come of this. But I tend to think Trump will do nothing but irreparably damage the Republican brand for decades to come, and we’ll get eight years of Hillary – likely without being able to retain our congressional majority; the one thing that would make her even vaguely tolerable as president. Nevertheless, it’s time to strap in and face the facts. The Trump train might have no brakes. And we’re in for a bumpy ride.

    Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images

    Corie Whalen Stephens is a libertarian-conservative activist and writer based in Houston, Texas.

    Click through the gallery below to read more from Corie.


    Liberty

    The fight for liberty will always transcend presidential politics.

    Photo by rypson/Getty Images

    Tea Party

    The tea party is not Trump and not dead, it's just different now.

    Photo by Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images

    Gun Control

    The gun control debate reveals the fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives.

    Photo by STILLFX/Getty Images

    Liberty

    This Presidential cycle is a reminder that anti-establishment doesn't mean pro-liberty.

    Photo by Michael Flippo/Getty Images

    Refugees

    Let's get past the refugee rhetoric and look at the facts.

    Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

    Election 2016

    The latest Republican debate marked the end of the Bush dynasty.

    Photo by Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

    Presidential Election

    Is Marco Rubio ready for his moment? He very well could become the GOP nominee.

    Photo by Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

    Debate Lessons

    Did we actually learn anything from the recent long, chaotic Republican debate?

    Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

    Identity Politics

    Stop expecting conservatives to give up their identities.

    Photo by BananaStock/Getty Images

    Local Politics

    Corie Whalen-Stephens explore why to win nationally, we need to first act locally.

    Photo by LuminaStock / Getty Images

    Foreign Policy

    A generational gap in foreign policy opinions could spell bad news for Republicans.

    Criminal Justice Reform

    Corie Whalen Stephens discusses how President Obama is finally catching up with libertarians on criminal justice reform.

    Photo by Mark Makela/Getty Images

    Election 2016

    Can a Republican Presidential candidate earn the Black vote?

    Donald Trump

    Defending Donald Trump is a contribution to the Democratic party.

    Photo by Christopher Gregory/Getty Images

    Rand Paul on Marriage

    Senator Rand Paul, who is known as the most libertarian Republican presidential candidate, believes the government should respect contracts between consenting adults, but stop defining marriage.

    Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images

    Libertarians

    Read Corie Whalen Stephens' first article on EveryJoe -- Libertarians Can Stop Worrying and Embrace Rand Paul’s Strategy.

    Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images
    Use Arrow Keys (← →) to Browse

    Be Sociable, Share!

      Related Posts

      • Kasimir Urbanski

        It’d be pretty damn hypocritical of the Republican Establishment to mount a challenge now, after having made such a huge deal of how they demanded Trump promise not to run as a candidate if he lost the nomination.

      • Kasimir Urbanski

        I think there’s a very basic truth learned here: SOCIAL libertarianism has a huge appeal. I guess what the guys at Breitbart call “Cultural Libertarianism”. The road to Libertarianism is not by talking about economic theory and free markets and abolishing social services; it’s by telling people “we want you to be able to do what you like without the government telling you what to do”.
        I’m more convinced than ever that this is where it has to start, not with what most self-styled libertarians do, making everyone’s eyes roll by not shutting up about market theory and voluntarism and Mises or Rothbard, etc etc. You need a POPULIST libertarianism first; you change the culture and then you change the economic policy.

        And yes, I totally agree that you need to do this by entryism to the GOP, not by trying to run useless 3rd party movements full of people more interested in Libertarian-Virtue-Signalling than actually changing anything.

        • Lindambuckner2


          “my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet.”….


          two days ago new McLaren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month .,3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Hereoo!640➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsWay/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:❦A1:::::oo!640…..

      • Jose Pupillo

        “[T]heir leader’s penchant for insulting anyone who dares to dissent, would be emboldened.”

        Go ahead and disagree with a feminist, BLM or some other snowflake-status group and tell me insulting dissenters is reserved for Trump and white supremacists.

      Be Sociable, Share!