<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Ways to Make Great Decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:49:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ade McCormack</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-308539</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade McCormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slackermanager.com/2008/04/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions.html#comment-308539</guid>
		<description>Their apparent simplicity belies their complexity. 

&#039;Interpret information&#039; is nothing less than knowledge management, one of the greatest challenges facing service based organisations across the planet. One&#039;s ability to interpret information determines what value one yield&#039;s from that information. Where decisions involve more than one person, perhaps a corporation, the interpretation challenge grows exponentially.

&#039;Know your options&#039; - again a knowledge management issue. Do you have access to the knowledge resident in your colleague&#039;s heads (perhaps globally distributed) to build a complete picture of your options? The same being true for &#039;Know your negotiables and non-negotiables&#039;.

I would add a fourth point &#039; Decide whether to decide&#039;. Often the pressures of business and life cause us to treat our responsibilities as a &#039;to do&#039; list to work through. Smart people recognise when focused procrastination is the best course of action. A delayed response often has the benefit of recency value in respect of new information coming to light. 

Those that make the best decisions(including the decision not to decide) win in both life and business. As more decisions involve  highly intermeshed globally distributed communities decision making becomes a boardroom challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their apparent simplicity belies their complexity. </p>
<p>&#8216;Interpret information&#8217; is nothing less than knowledge management, one of the greatest challenges facing service based organisations across the planet. One&#8217;s ability to interpret information determines what value one yield&#8217;s from that information. Where decisions involve more than one person, perhaps a corporation, the interpretation challenge grows exponentially.</p>
<p>&#8216;Know your options&#8217; &#8211; again a knowledge management issue. Do you have access to the knowledge resident in your colleague&#8217;s heads (perhaps globally distributed) to build a complete picture of your options? The same being true for &#8216;Know your negotiables and non-negotiables&#8217;.</p>
<p>I would add a fourth point &#8216; Decide whether to decide&#8217;. Often the pressures of business and life cause us to treat our responsibilities as a &#8216;to do&#8217; list to work through. Smart people recognise when focused procrastination is the best course of action. A delayed response often has the benefit of recency value in respect of new information coming to light. </p>
<p>Those that make the best decisions(including the decision not to decide) win in both life and business. As more decisions involve  highly intermeshed globally distributed communities decision making becomes a boardroom challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gerbyshak</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-309215</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gerbyshak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slackermanager.com/2008/04/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions.html#comment-309215</guid>
		<description>Thanks Steve. Glad to share your stuff.

The negotiables and non-negotiables frame every decision I make. Sometimes I bend, and sometimes not. Understanding my values are key to this decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steve. Glad to share your stuff.</p>
<p>The negotiables and non-negotiables frame every decision I make. Sometimes I bend, and sometimes not. Understanding my values are key to this decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bannister</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-309037</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bannister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slackermanager.com/2008/04/3-ways-to-make-great-decisions.html#comment-309037</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Thanks for the reference.  I like your idea about negotiables and non-negotiables.

Cheers,
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Thanks for the reference.  I like your idea about negotiables and non-negotiables.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
