<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN Asks: What Is The Kindle&#8217;s Potential?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/cnn-asks-what-is-the-kindles-potential-217/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/cnn-asks-what-is-the-kindles-potential-217/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:26:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/cnn-asks-what-is-the-kindles-potential-217/comment-page-1/#comment-336688</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workboxers.com/2008/05/22/cnn-asks-what-is-the-kindles-potential/#comment-336688</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s most likely that owning a vast library of information would not appeal to most readers in the world. The capacity to do so could certainly be there in the future, but not very likely that it would erase libraries anytime soon. Then of course there is the idea that you could have an entire library of information at your fingertips one day. This would probably not replace your local library for sometime, if that were true, then why would it NOT have been done already given the vast internet and home computers at the this time. The most likely reason is that people don&#039;t have time in there day, or care enough to have access to such information. The other reason could be, that having such vast amounts of knowledge is so impractical for anyone, not having the capability to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s most likely that owning a vast library of information would not appeal to most readers in the world. The capacity to do so could certainly be there in the future, but not very likely that it would erase libraries anytime soon. Then of course there is the idea that you could have an entire library of information at your fingertips one day. This would probably not replace your local library for sometime, if that were true, then why would it NOT have been done already given the vast internet and home computers at the this time. The most likely reason is that people don&#8217;t have time in there day, or care enough to have access to such information. The other reason could be, that having such vast amounts of knowledge is so impractical for anyone, not having the capability to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>