<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content is King and I have Proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof-217/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof-217/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof-217/comment-page-1/#comment-334847</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/2006/11/01/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof/#comment-334847</guid>
		<description>thanks

pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
<p>pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamsi</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof-217/comment-page-1/#comment-334846</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/2006/11/01/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof/#comment-334846</guid>
		<description>Remove the anchor text? Party pooper!

I&#039;ve added a rel=nofollow instead :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remove the anchor text? Party pooper!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve added a rel=nofollow instead :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mer om sÃ¶kmotoroptimeringstÃ¤vlingar</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof-217/comment-page-1/#comment-334845</link>
		<dc:creator>Mer om sÃ¶kmotoroptimeringstÃ¤vlingar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 09:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/2006/11/01/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof/#comment-334845</guid>
		<description>[...] Hur vinner man dÃ¥ en sÃ¥dan sÃ¶kmotoroptimeringstÃ¤vling? Jamsi pÃ¥ Workboxers, har en teori: &#8220;content is king&#8220;. Han menar att trots det intensiva insatsen av &#8220;black hats&#8221; med olika spamtekniker sÃ¥ Ã¤r det Ã¤ndÃ¥ bloggar, som regelbundet publicerat &#8220;kvalitativt&#8221; material som tagit topplaceringarna i tÃ¤vlingen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hur vinner man dÃ¥ en sÃ¥dan sÃ¶kmotoroptimeringstÃ¤vling? Jamsi pÃ¥ Workboxers, har en teori: &#8220;content is king&#8220;. Han menar att trots det intensiva insatsen av &#8220;black hats&#8221; med olika spamtekniker sÃ¥ Ã¤r det Ã¤ndÃ¥ bloggar, som regelbundet publicerat &#8220;kvalitativt&#8221; material som tagit topplaceringarna i tÃ¤vlingen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof-217/comment-page-1/#comment-334844</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/2006/11/01/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof/#comment-334844</guid>
		<description>additionally i would like to request you remove that anchor text pointing to my website

Thank you

Peter Drew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>additionally i would like to request you remove that anchor text pointing to my website</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Peter Drew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof-217/comment-page-1/#comment-334843</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/2006/11/01/content-is-king-and-i-have-proof/#comment-334843</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

like to make a few points about your observations.

not at all denying that hard work and generating strong backlinks will always be successful etc.

though in my case about 20th place.. this blog was put up in 5 mins, i spent another 5 mins updating links around the place as you can see from the backlinks

I then spent 2 hours creating links from free authority websites and provided related content to these sites/blogs all of now are PR 4 or 5

So total time for the project under 3 hours

I did plan to put more time and effort into this competition, though when I researched the work needed to get above the top 3 sites for example, i saw I didnt have the time or resources, as we were pretty busy on existing projects and still are.

So I agree that your points are made fairly.

though need to point out, that this site ranked quite well for the little amount of time put into it. 
(oh i just remembered i did spend another hour or so putting links to it from SB sites etc)

The site was an experiment to learn from, during the course of the competition, i added 
(a) duplicate content.
(b) removed it
(c) fresh content.
(d) removed it.

and observed the rankings go up and down accordingly, at one point my site dropped to around 150, this was after removing all content.

and as you see its climbed back up to 15 when the competition closed.

So all in all, was a fun contest and I learnt a Lot as im sure did many others

Peter Drew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>like to make a few points about your observations.</p>
<p>not at all denying that hard work and generating strong backlinks will always be successful etc.</p>
<p>though in my case about 20th place.. this blog was put up in 5 mins, i spent another 5 mins updating links around the place as you can see from the backlinks</p>
<p>I then spent 2 hours creating links from free authority websites and provided related content to these sites/blogs all of now are PR 4 or 5</p>
<p>So total time for the project under 3 hours</p>
<p>I did plan to put more time and effort into this competition, though when I researched the work needed to get above the top 3 sites for example, i saw I didnt have the time or resources, as we were pretty busy on existing projects and still are.</p>
<p>So I agree that your points are made fairly.</p>
<p>though need to point out, that this site ranked quite well for the little amount of time put into it.<br />
(oh i just remembered i did spend another hour or so putting links to it from SB sites etc)</p>
<p>The site was an experiment to learn from, during the course of the competition, i added<br />
(a) duplicate content.<br />
(b) removed it<br />
(c) fresh content.<br />
(d) removed it.</p>
<p>and observed the rankings go up and down accordingly, at one point my site dropped to around 150, this was after removing all content.</p>
<p>and as you see its climbed back up to 15 when the competition closed.</p>
<p>So all in all, was a fun contest and I learnt a Lot as im sure did many others</p>
<p>Peter Drew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>