Comments on: Copyright wars

By: Vince Chan

Vince Chan — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:26:23 +0000

RoyT,

No offense taken. I like people calling it the way it is. If it’s business, so be it!

Which brings me to my point… I’ve given the analogy of amateur blogging as opposed to the widely coveted professional blogging using sports metaphors. It’s coincidence that the Olympics are currently running. Before the Dream Team and other professionals got into the Olympics, such competitions were strictly reserved for “amateurs”.

Now, these amateurs have trained for years, and they also have sponsors. But their are still considered amateurs instead of pros. Ice skating is a perfect sport to illustrate the separation of these terms. Hope that helps!

P.S. Which site from the level9media network had this wanker of the week? I wouldn’t mind looking at myself!

By: RoyT

RoyT — Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:58:43 +0000

by the way, “wanker of the week” is just someone nominated on one of our sites who has goofed up or done something pretty stupid to offend a lot of people..that week

By: RoyT

RoyT — Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:57:10 +0000

I asked “certain people” who they think should be this weeks”wanker of the week” and a vast majority said “Vince’s AMblogger. So I did and there he is.Just thought the title fits since all this talk has been going.

And Vince, if you are reading this, don’t take any offense, its just business =)

ps..if you have been blogging for a while, you would you still be an amateur?

By: Vince Chan

Vince Chan — Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:04:03 +0000

no links for me! (self imposed)

I’m making the rounds to read all the posts about this issue. The visitors can judge if they ever want to have anything to do with AmBlogger again. I’m more than content to have just 1 reader if that 1 truly likes it. I’ve been blogging for quite a while now and have shown that I have no quarrels about maintaining sites with mediocre traffic.

There isn’t any consicous thought with intent to do harm or hype things for myself. Just one bad decision compounded by another.

By: Elliott Back

Elliott Back — Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:02:49 +0000

I don’t think getting 2500 negative impressions is great traffic anyway–the growth is nice, but it’ll spike back down to sub100 levels unless he keeps pulling crazy stunts. That, and his writing is completely incoherent…

By: Jennifer Grucza

Jennifer Grucza — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:00:48 +0000

I tend to agree with Marco – I think Darren’s content is great, but his is not the first design I’d steal. :)

By: Marco

Marco — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:19:50 +0000

Personally I fail to understand why anyone would even WANT to steal the template from problogger.net but maybe that’s just me. There’s a whole lot of better designs out there to steal if you ask me ;)

Therefore it’s probably some cheap publicity stunt indeed which is, as Kyle indicated, not very beneficial in the long run.

By: Kyle

Kyle — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:36:11 +0000

Thanks :) Since launching my copywriting site I’ve had a number of people say things to the likes of “What doess writing have to do with copyrighting? Isn’t it already copyrighted?”

Little pet peve of mine ;)

And while his stunt might get him a few hundred one-time visitors, it’s unlikely he’ll be able to keep any of them. Cheap stunts are just that, they don’t get you anywhere in the long run.

By: Jamsi

Jamsi — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:42:34 +0000

Doh. That’s what I get for rushing out a post without using my brain.
Cheers Kyle.

By: Kyle

Kyle — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:38:10 +0000

Dude, it's copyright not copywrite. Copywrite, is like Copywriting. Like, writing good copy. Not legally owning something. Arrrrrrgh.