<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Franchise Conflict Goes Silent &#8211; Sinister, or Reputation Management?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:35:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Steinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351428</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Steinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351428</guid>
		<description>Here we are, almost 2 years later.

Looks like the verdict is in on Cuppy&#039;s. In the end, it appears that it will not be all the disappearing franchisee money that kills them off. Rather, the banks are facing defaults by borrowers who state that they never got their equipment or stores built out.

&quot;Reputation management&quot; only goes so far when the underlying facts don&#039;t change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we are, almost 2 years later.</p>
<p>Looks like the verdict is in on Cuppy&#8217;s. In the end, it appears that it will not be all the disappearing franchisee money that kills them off. Rather, the banks are facing defaults by borrowers who state that they never got their equipment or stores built out.</p>
<p>&#8220;Reputation management&#8221; only goes so far when the underlying facts don&#8217;t change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trisha Paliotti</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351427</link>
		<dc:creator>Trisha Paliotti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351427</guid>
		<description>When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, it ceases to be a subject of interest.   
 

I am so really extremly shocked to see all of the post on the matter I discussed earlier are gone. Everything I have posted on this matter has been deleted. Someone tell me there has got to be something I can do about this. Cuppy&#039;s is/ has to be breaking some law by deleting these post and redirecting URL&#039;s. I fully plan to look into this, I spoke to the IT guy At work today and he says it is a break of federal law. That these people seem to just be getting themselves into more trouble. This really has my attention now. And anyone interested in free speach or even the gift we have been given to blog our thoughts and opinions should be deeply concerned by this company&#039;s obviouse attempt at silencing it&#039;s criticts. I can not believe that any lawyer representing this company would give them this advice. I know one thing I am not Scoble , I will set up a 1000 different blogs and let them delete them so that I can sue. Not for money but principal. How dare they think they have some power over the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, it ceases to be a subject of interest.   </p>
<p>I am so really extremly shocked to see all of the post on the matter I discussed earlier are gone. Everything I have posted on this matter has been deleted. Someone tell me there has got to be something I can do about this. Cuppy&#8217;s is/ has to be breaking some law by deleting these post and redirecting URL&#8217;s. I fully plan to look into this, I spoke to the IT guy At work today and he says it is a break of federal law. That these people seem to just be getting themselves into more trouble. This really has my attention now. And anyone interested in free speach or even the gift we have been given to blog our thoughts and opinions should be deeply concerned by this company&#8217;s obviouse attempt at silencing it&#8217;s criticts. I can not believe that any lawyer representing this company would give them this advice. I know one thing I am not Scoble , I will set up a 1000 different blogs and let them delete them so that I can sue. Not for money but principal. How dare they think they have some power over the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalMoneyWorld.com - Weekly Favorite From The Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351426</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalMoneyWorld.com - Weekly Favorite From The Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351426</guid>
		<description>[...] You can also find more on this topic over at Common Sense PR. Just take a closer look at, &#8220;Franchise Conflict Goes Silent - Sinister, or Reputation Management?&#8220;. The b5media business channel takes a closer look. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can also find more on this topic over at Common Sense PR. Just take a closer look at, &#8220;Franchise Conflict Goes Silent &#8211; Sinister, or Reputation Management?&#8220;. The b5media business channel takes a closer look. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense PR - Public Accusations Tread a Fine Legal Line</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351425</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense PR - Public Accusations Tread a Fine Legal Line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351425</guid>
		<description>[...] Right after writing about the Scoble/Java Jo&#8217;z/Cuppy&#8217;s example of a company apparently fighting back against allegations posted on blog posts, I came across this small, sad tale of a couple who sold their small, distributed sales sex toy company and were appalled when they got squeezed out by the new owner. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right after writing about the Scoble/Java Jo&#8217;z/Cuppy&#8217;s example of a company apparently fighting back against allegations posted on blog posts, I came across this small, sad tale of a couple who sold their small, distributed sales sex toy company and were appalled when they got squeezed out by the new owner. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Reputation management</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351424</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Reputation management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351424</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting, because from the SEO side of things, I&#039;m more focused on controlling the message proactively by dominating the SERPs. Here&#039;s a case of reactive reputation management, and completely mishandled to boot. They need a new PR firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting, because from the SEO side of things, I&#8217;m more focused on controlling the message proactively by dominating the SERPs. Here&#8217;s a case of reactive reputation management, and completely mishandled to boot. They need a new PR firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Steinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351423</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Steinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351423</guid>
		<description>My cown omments on BlueMauMau have been deleted several times, and the webmaster has told me it was not him. In fact, one of the posts was one which he had to put up for me since the site was blocking me (again, something the webmaster had no knowledge of).

I do know that Cuppy&#039;s has made offers to ostensibly neutral parties, including a journalist. In my case, I was approached by a frequent blogger (and defender of Cuppys) on the site and I said bluntly that I was not for sale and gave a blunt message for the blogger to relay back to Cuppys.

I posted 3 times on the payola issue before I finally got one of the posts which did not mysteriously disappear.

It is bad enough to pay people to post fake blogs. But there are a host of curious coincidences and electronic evidence which is-- shall we say, indicative of a malicious program.

Some of you may have already have figured out what happened with the BlueMauMau site; suffice it to say that other blogs such as FranchisePundit have now seen the need for more robust defense against the  bad guys and upgraded their protection.

Most of the world does not need to care about abusive franchise companies. 

But... hacking websites and deleting negative comments from someone else&#039;s website without the permission of the webmaster is serious and should be of great concern to all of us.

BTW: Let&#039;s not be hard on Scoble-- he did what he had to do, he broke no laws, and besides if there is an investigation and he is under oath (along with the franchisor&#039;s attorneys and marketing people) my guess is that Scoble is itching to tell the truth once he is protected against anyone suing him.

And let&#039;s remember that Scoble went out on a limb and forced light on this issue. We should be commending him for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cown omments on BlueMauMau have been deleted several times, and the webmaster has told me it was not him. In fact, one of the posts was one which he had to put up for me since the site was blocking me (again, something the webmaster had no knowledge of).</p>
<p>I do know that Cuppy&#8217;s has made offers to ostensibly neutral parties, including a journalist. In my case, I was approached by a frequent blogger (and defender of Cuppys) on the site and I said bluntly that I was not for sale and gave a blunt message for the blogger to relay back to Cuppys.</p>
<p>I posted 3 times on the payola issue before I finally got one of the posts which did not mysteriously disappear.</p>
<p>It is bad enough to pay people to post fake blogs. But there are a host of curious coincidences and electronic evidence which is&#8211; shall we say, indicative of a malicious program.</p>
<p>Some of you may have already have figured out what happened with the BlueMauMau site; suffice it to say that other blogs such as FranchisePundit have now seen the need for more robust defense against the  bad guys and upgraded their protection.</p>
<p>Most of the world does not need to care about abusive franchise companies. </p>
<p>But&#8230; hacking websites and deleting negative comments from someone else&#8217;s website without the permission of the webmaster is serious and should be of great concern to all of us.</p>
<p>BTW: Let&#8217;s not be hard on Scoble&#8211; he did what he had to do, he broke no laws, and besides if there is an investigation and he is under oath (along with the franchisor&#8217;s attorneys and marketing people) my guess is that Scoble is itching to tell the truth once he is protected against anyone suing him.</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s remember that Scoble went out on a limb and forced light on this issue. We should be commending him for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandcurve.com</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351422</link>
		<dc:creator>brandcurve.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351422</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bad PR...both ways!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Before even starting, head over to FranchisePicks&#039; summary of the situation Cuppy Coffee&#039;s going through. Click Here. Are you done? Great!  As you might have figured out by now, this is a terrible PR situation for the company to be in. Not only have ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bad PR&#8230;both ways!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Before even starting, head over to FranchisePicks&#8217; summary of the situation Cuppy Coffee&#8217;s going through. Click Here. Are you done? Great!  As you might have figured out by now, this is a terrible PR situation for the company to be in. Not only have &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scandalous Weekend Links &#124; Copyblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351421</link>
		<dc:creator>Scandalous Weekend Links &#124; Copyblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351421</guid>
		<description>[...] Want a juicy tale involving Robert Scoble, his brother Ben, a franchise fiasco, a bullying corporation, and a disappearing post from Scoble’s own blog? Then you’ve got to read this. Additional coverage here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Want a juicy tale involving Robert Scoble, his brother Ben, a franchise fiasco, a bullying corporation, and a disappearing post from Scoble’s own blog? Then you’ve got to read this. Additional coverage here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franchise Pick - Bloggers alarmed at Scoble&#8217;s Deleted Posts, Cuppy&#8217;s Coffee situation</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351420</link>
		<dc:creator>Franchise Pick - Bloggers alarmed at Scoble&#8217;s Deleted Posts, Cuppy&#8217;s Coffee situation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsensepr.com/2007/01/26/franchise-conflict-goes-silent-sinister-or-reputation-management/#comment-351420</guid>
		<description>[...] Franchise Conflict Goes Silent - Sinister, or Reputation Management? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Franchise Conflict Goes Silent &#8211; Sinister, or Reputation Management? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>