Comments on: iPod Nano, Love It or Hate It?

By: 3rd Gen iPod Nano: Not As Bad As It Looks

3rd Gen iPod Nano: Not As Bad As It Looks — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:31:22 +0000

[...] focusing on aesthetics, the 3rd Gen iPod Nano is not as bad as it looks. My previous post “iPod Nano, Love It or Hate It?” I was inclined to hate the Nano’s looks. It just didn’t look very nice in the [...]

By: Juan

Juan — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:47:02 +0000

@Eli
Yes I love the 2 gen Nano’s design as well. As far as Nano’s go that one is the best.

@DKCN
Yeah, it may be due to competition that’s why the video function was added. I guess time will tell if that proves to be a good thing.

By: DKCN

DKCN — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:45:26 +0000

Canon 400D vs Sony a100 vs Nikon D40

They cost roughly the same, but the Nikon D40 only has 6 Megapixels While the Canon/Sony has 10 Megapixels. Nikon found it very hard to compete, so they made a Nikon D40x which now has 10 MP. Most of us will never need that extra 4 MP, but most will still buy either one of the 10 MP cameras.

I think the option to put video on the Nano is due to competition and not for the need to have one, just like competition elsewhere.

By: eli

eli — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:56:09 +0000

I’m in the hate it category. I really like the old Nano’s design. And I for one, don’t think movies or videos should be watched on a screen that small. A totally unnecessary feature for my part.

By: DKCN

DKCN — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:21:55 +0000

Hate it as well. And to quote my cousin, “It looks more like an Unano (midget?) than a Nano” =)