At worst: It would give the world a common enemy, ultimately leading to a revolution and utopian world government. Like anything else, the worse it is, the better it ultimately gets.

I think it’s a win-win, even if it takes some time.

If “most national currencies should be eliminated because they end up being manipulated by politicians,” then just one currency in the hands of a few dominant bankers & politicians would be retarded. It would “do more economic harm than good” for the entire world all at once! That is unless you’re a banker or a politician. Think about it…

What makes this piece of CFR trash think global monetary tyrrany would be better (for the common man) than localized only country-wide, case-by-case monetary tyrrany? At least run-away inflation right now doesn’t take the entire world’s economy down – just a country or two. If the currency was global, the economic devastation would be global. How is that better?