<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Microsoft making the same mistakes with Windows 7?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:00:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-284620</link>
		<dc:creator>James Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvistaweblog.com/2008/05/31/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/#comment-284620</guid>
		<description>If Microsoft&#039;s play book for Windows 7 is the same as it was for Vista then Windows 7 will also flop. I understand the need for increasingly larger OSes as resources larger. I also understand the need for security in the MS product and how Vista &quot;addresses&quot; this need in Vista.
Vista is just unusable. I have Vista Business 64bit and I do a good deal of testing software for use in the Microsoft courses I teach. Microsoft&#039;s implementation of the c:\windows\winsxs folder is one indicator in how they failed. My winsxs folder is 10GB in size. I have partitioned my hard drive with a 40GB primary partition. I should not need 10% of a 40GB drive for Microsoft&#039;s &quot;DLL Hell&quot; issue. A student performed a clean install of Vista and the winsxs folder was 5.8gb.
Windows XP also had the winsxs folder but the size of the folder was measured in MB not GB.

I am not the only one with this issue: http://del.icio.us/jh2fct/winsxs

The winsxs folder is just one example (and a glaring example at that) of how the OS was released prematurely, poorly tested, and without consulting the &quot;beta testers&quot; they brought on board. If they follow the same play book then Microsoft will watch as their reputation crumbles and Linux and Apple make huge gains in market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft&#8217;s play book for Windows 7 is the same as it was for Vista then Windows 7 will also flop. I understand the need for increasingly larger OSes as resources larger. I also understand the need for security in the MS product and how Vista &#8220;addresses&#8221; this need in Vista.<br />
Vista is just unusable. I have Vista Business 64bit and I do a good deal of testing software for use in the Microsoft courses I teach. Microsoft&#8217;s implementation of the c:\windows\winsxs folder is one indicator in how they failed. My winsxs folder is 10GB in size. I have partitioned my hard drive with a 40GB primary partition. I should not need 10% of a 40GB drive for Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;DLL Hell&#8221; issue. A student performed a clean install of Vista and the winsxs folder was 5.8gb.<br />
Windows XP also had the winsxs folder but the size of the folder was measured in MB not GB.</p>
<p>I am not the only one with this issue: <a href="http://del.icio.us/jh2fct/winsxs" rel="nofollow">http://del.icio.us/jh2fct/winsxs</a></p>
<p>The winsxs folder is just one example (and a glaring example at that) of how the OS was released prematurely, poorly tested, and without consulting the &#8220;beta testers&#8221; they brought on board. If they follow the same play book then Microsoft will watch as their reputation crumbles and Linux and Apple make huge gains in market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Knight of Rick Roll</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-284263</link>
		<dc:creator>the Knight of Rick Roll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvistaweblog.com/2008/05/31/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/#comment-284263</guid>
		<description>

If iframes are not disabled, you must disable them! This will prevent others from using iframes in a more evil manner in the future. I also recommend Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If iframes are not disabled, you must disable them! This will prevent others from using iframes in a more evil manner in the future. I also recommend Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-284292</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvistaweblog.com/2008/05/31/is-microsoft-making-the-same-mistakes-with-windows-7/#comment-284292</guid>
		<description>Comments in the article are correct.  Vista is an abject failure.  They have not &quot;sold&quot; hundreds of millions of licenses.  They have FORCED people to stomach hundreds of millions of licenses by discontinuing XP.
I just got a Dell flyer in the mail yesterday that boldly proclaimed, &quot;Yes, you can still order a computer with XP.&quot;
Obviously, Dell gets enough requests for this that it&#039;s a serious marketing asset.

Unfortunately, after June, 2008, XP will no longer be available.

The article notes that by talking about Windows 7 so soon, it gives the impression that they (MS) are giving up on Vista.

YESSSSS!  They are giving up. No kidding.   

Amazingly, Apple is growing market share - something they have always had trouble doing.  FINALLY, the current Windows version is so bad and so painful, that die-hard Windows users are looking at Apple seriously.  That&#039;s the only way you grow market share, by pulling users away from the competition.  And that&#039;s not easy in the PC vs Apple &quot;war of religion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments in the article are correct.  Vista is an abject failure.  They have not &#8220;sold&#8221; hundreds of millions of licenses.  They have FORCED people to stomach hundreds of millions of licenses by discontinuing XP.<br />
I just got a Dell flyer in the mail yesterday that boldly proclaimed, &#8220;Yes, you can still order a computer with XP.&#8221;<br />
Obviously, Dell gets enough requests for this that it&#8217;s a serious marketing asset.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, after June, 2008, XP will no longer be available.</p>
<p>The article notes that by talking about Windows 7 so soon, it gives the impression that they (MS) are giving up on Vista.</p>
<p>YESSSSS!  They are giving up. No kidding.   </p>
<p>Amazingly, Apple is growing market share &#8211; something they have always had trouble doing.  FINALLY, the current Windows version is so bad and so painful, that die-hard Windows users are looking at Apple seriously.  That&#8217;s the only way you grow market share, by pulling users away from the competition.  And that&#8217;s not easy in the PC vs Apple &#8220;war of religion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
