You have to know that it is not the law that bothers me but the type of American man who does not see any need to fight it.

The owners of “Its Just Lunch” have to know that they are next. Look at the woman who was just killed after answering a Craigslist ad in Minnesota. The local newspaper wasted no time in asking the public if they feel that men should be background checked before using Craigslist.

You would stand for this even being discussed in the halls of Congress?

That is scary.

Don’t you take it personally that special interest groups succeeded in making it impossible to communicate with most of them (I already told you about how they mostly do not have email addresses)?

The US feminists have been trying for 15 years to get a law like this and I always assumed that at least Republicans would stop them on it because it is so blatantly an act to stop the competition and stop guys like me from meeting them.

I took this very personally and so have a few CEOs who are going to do something very big about this when they next transition between jobs. I am in a similar situation to them. I work during the European business day on trading in the industrial products business.

The CEOs I know are going to dismantle the entire Office on Violence Against Women and its $430Million budget.

They went way too far forcing American men to have background checks to say hello to women.

This Canadian who said “eh” was especially mean-spirited. I still assume it was a smart but bitter female. There was no logical reason for a male to fly off the handle using swear words to describe foreign women and their countries.

You scare me in that you don’t seem to understand this simple dynamic of your own software.

What did you think, that I was coming back to your little website every few minutes to check to see if someone wrote something?

Fat chance.

It also scares me that you seem to think there is 100% chance that you will never be single again or ever like someone like your friend found.

That is truly frightening…this attitude that the law does not affect you…this idea that it isn’t anything to you that a judge just said you don’t have an actual right to talk to a foreigner.

Don’t try to say that Thomas Rose’s decision didn’t show this kind of disdain for what you and I would have assumed all our lives was a fundamental right.

The only thing you can criticize me for, Sean, is the fact that I am on the computer at 10PM European time instead of swimming at the local pool, which would be healthier.

But I had a cold yesterday and today so staying in was probably the wise thing to do.

Having said that, I really do wish that more American males will take a much more proactive role in fighting things like this.

The majority think they are doing so by supporting Ron Paul for President.

But RP has very little chance of doing anything but teaching Giuliani a lesson for not talking more about civil rights…in that an RP third party run can put Hillary in the White House (which would mean more laws like this).