<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Celebrate: Wireless Penetration in Canada Hits 60%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/lets-celebrate-wireless-penetration-in-canada-hits-60-141/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/lets-celebrate-wireless-penetration-in-canada-hits-60-141/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:48:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Sieling</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/lets-celebrate-wireless-penetration-in-canada-hits-60-141/comment-page-1/#comment-330455</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sieling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapleleaftwo.com/lets-celebrate-wireless-penetration-in-canada-hits-60/#comment-330455</guid>
		<description>Canada is a very different beast for connectivity growth from European nations. Firstly, the cost of building coverage for a widely distributed population in highly variable territory is different from Europe. Where you might have x-hundred potential customers for every square km of coverage in Europe, you have x-tens in Canada&#039;s more sparsely populated terrain. 
Also, it&#039;s worth noting that wireless growth in Europe was helped along by the fact that at least in the UK, local calls incur charges. 
While I&#039;m happy to see Canadians ditching wires more, it&#039;s kind of an apples to oranges comparison to hold it up to current use in Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada is a very different beast for connectivity growth from European nations. Firstly, the cost of building coverage for a widely distributed population in highly variable territory is different from Europe. Where you might have x-hundred potential customers for every square km of coverage in Europe, you have x-tens in Canada&#8217;s more sparsely populated terrain.<br />
Also, it&#8217;s worth noting that wireless growth in Europe was helped along by the fact that at least in the UK, local calls incur charges.<br />
While I&#8217;m happy to see Canadians ditching wires more, it&#8217;s kind of an apples to oranges comparison to hold it up to current use in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>