Skip to content

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

MARY KAY: Business or Hobby? What the IRS Thinks…

July 19, 2008 by Sean Kelly  
Filed under Business

You may think of your Mary Kay, Pampered Chef or Avon business as a, well, business… but does the IRS?

Tax Resolutionaries reports on an important tax ruling that could affect you and your business.  Or hobby:

Ladies, this is one that you need to take great heed from. Before you invest in all those Pampered Chef, cosmetic sales and even “pleasure toy” shows, you might want to talk with Brenda Konchar, a Mary Kay Cosmetics representative who took her case before the Tax Court in Ralph D. Konchar, et ux. V. Commissioner, Tax Court Summary Opinion 2004-59.

Brenda Konchar reported net losses on Schedule C for her Mary Kay activity in 1996, 1997, and 1998. The IRS disallowed the business losses, since the activity was not a trade or business entered into for profit. It was a hobby. Furthermore, even if the activity had been conducted with a profit motive, most of her business expenses could not be substantiated.

Under §183(b), if an activity is not engaged in for profit, expenses are generally only deductible to the extent of the gross income from the activity. The deductions that exceed gross income cannot create a business loss.

An activity is conducted for profit if deductions are allowable under

1. §162 as ordinary and necessary trade or business expenses; or
2. §212 as expenses for the production or collection of income.

Under either section, the taxpayer must intend to make a profit. Whether an activity is conducted with a profit motive is based upon all relevant facts and circumstances.

Under §1.183-2(b), the Courts consider nine nonexclusive factors to determine whether an activity is engaged in for profit:

CONTINUE READING

 ALSO READ:

MARY KAY: Hot or NOT? (Part 1 of 4)

MARY KAY: Hot or NOT? (Part 2 of 4)

MARY KAY: Hot or NOT? (Part 3 of 4)

MARY KAY: Hot or NOT? (Part 4 of 4)

WHAT DO YOU THINK?  SHARE A COMMENT.

_________________________

unhappybutton

Unhappy Franchisee: Franchising rumors, rants, controversies, issues, complaints & insider information you’re not supposed to know.

Unbiased franchise information, franchise interviews and detailed, searchable information on 400 franchise and business opportunities..

top new franchise opportunitiesFranchisees, customers & experts vote for their favorite new franchises at Top New Franchise: Who’s hot. Who’s not.

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • BallHype
  • YardBarker

Comments

One Response to “MARY KAY: Business or Hobby? What the IRS Thinks…”
  1. mk4me says:

    The same rules apply to any small business, sole ownership, not just direct sales, I am sure that many get carried aways with what they try to take as expenses. The IRS allows “reasonable” expenses, if you start a MK business and go out and charge office furniture, copiers, computers, hire an assistant, etc… and don’t do more than take a few orders a year, and do the same, year after year, I would hope IRS would have a problem with it.

    If any business shows a loss but the expenses are in line with the profits, the IRS can still allow it.

    And a very common mistake is inventory is not a business expense. Inventory is an assest. With many of the common mistakes made, it is highly possible that Brenda Konchar’s expenses were so out of line, that the IRS had every reason to disallow them. Are we able to see a copy of her Schedule C that she filed for those years?

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for EveryJoe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.