<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe Twitter SHOULDN&#8217;T Monetize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:58:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Rowe</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/comment-page-1/#comment-324226</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/#comment-324226</guid>
		<description>Nice post Colleen ... it&#039;s interesting to read a different perspective on this.

I certainly don&#039;t think that Twitter should monetize by way of advertising. I think advertising would ultimately kill Twitter off. Anyone who uses Twitter to promote themselves (myself included) know that you have to be very, very subtle about it. 

Instead, I think monetization could be based around the huge loyalty of twitter fans. I think they would be a lot of people that are so hooked on Twitter, they&#039;d be prepared to pay for it.

I guess something similar to the flickr &#039;pro&#039; model could work, whereby paying users are given additional features AND the &#039;badge of honor&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Colleen &#8230; it&#8217;s interesting to read a different perspective on this.</p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t think that Twitter should monetize by way of advertising. I think advertising would ultimately kill Twitter off. Anyone who uses Twitter to promote themselves (myself included) know that you have to be very, very subtle about it. </p>
<p>Instead, I think monetization could be based around the huge loyalty of twitter fans. I think they would be a lot of people that are so hooked on Twitter, they&#8217;d be prepared to pay for it.</p>
<p>I guess something similar to the flickr &#8216;pro&#8217; model could work, whereby paying users are given additional features AND the &#8216;badge of honor&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain Saffel</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/comment-page-1/#comment-324197</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Saffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/#comment-324197</guid>
		<description>I think that if Twitter users want to see Twitter stick around and improve, they should be prepared for it to be monetized. Besides, what&#039;s wrong with that? Why shouldn&#039;t they be rewarded for their hard work on what has turned out to be a pretty good application?

If people truly value the service Twitter provides, then they&#039;ll sign up. As long is it&#039;s a reasonable charge, I&#039;m more than prepared to sign on, whether it&#039;s a monthly fee or some ads.

If they want to keep a big user base, they can have a premium version with no ads and the free version with ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if Twitter users want to see Twitter stick around and improve, they should be prepared for it to be monetized. Besides, what&#8217;s wrong with that? Why shouldn&#8217;t they be rewarded for their hard work on what has turned out to be a pretty good application?</p>
<p>If people truly value the service Twitter provides, then they&#8217;ll sign up. As long is it&#8217;s a reasonable charge, I&#8217;m more than prepared to sign on, whether it&#8217;s a monthly fee or some ads.</p>
<p>If they want to keep a big user base, they can have a premium version with no ads and the free version with ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlyn Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/comment-page-1/#comment-324196</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlyn Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/#comment-324196</guid>
		<description>Colleen, I think most of us would agree that Twitter needs to be sustainable and needs a revenue model, just not one that tweets adverts. I&#039;ll unfollow anyone who starts &quot;magpieing&quot; me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colleen, I think most of us would agree that Twitter needs to be sustainable and needs a revenue model, just not one that tweets adverts. I&#8217;ll unfollow anyone who starts &#8220;magpieing&#8221; me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie/HaloSecretarial</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/comment-page-1/#comment-324195</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie/HaloSecretarial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/maybe-twitter-shouldnt-monetize/#comment-324195</guid>
		<description>I LOVE Twitter and sure hope that it isn&#039;t a casualty of the terrible economy.  I&#039;d rather be advertised to than lose it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE Twitter and sure hope that it isn&#8217;t a casualty of the terrible economy.  I&#8217;d rather be advertised to than lose it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>