Skip to content

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Meek Surrender, Delhi Daredevils you waste!

May 30, 2008 by Ankit  
Filed under Tennis

Oh yes, I am frustrated! Glen McGrath is on the top of my list of people I am frustrated with. This pitch had bounce, this pitch had carry, this pitch had movement. THIS PITCH HAD LIFE! Mr. Amit Mishra, this pitch HAD TURN FORGOSSAKE! You already know that despite all the above facts, Delhi allowed Rajasthan to get away and score 192. After that innings, I was thinking that this is a belter of a pitch and whenever you mention the term belter to Sehwag, he would say : “I’ll get it”. Maybe someone did….Maybe no one did. Whatever! He failed. Everyone failed.

Just look at the scorecard and it will tell you the story. I am frustrated…At the end of it all, it was funny to see McGrath urging Munaf to not bowl short at him. NOT!

I am so not impressed!

image

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • BallHype
  • YardBarker

Comments

5 Responses to “Meek Surrender, Delhi Daredevils you waste!”
  1. I just went to sleep once Shikhar Dhawan got out … chasing 192 it was game over then.

  2. scorpicity says:

    ha… and I thought that 3D will win this tourno… anyway RR were the better team so it doesn’t matter.

  3. Dinnie says:

    Delhi be gone! You go Super Kings!

  4. Ankit says:

    Dhawan wasnt in my list of Pressure performers either…

    i vote for Rajasthan Royals now (check the poll)

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] you thought the first Semi Final was one sided enough, think again! This match really redefined one sided for me. [...]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for EveryJoe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.