<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon Blogger Campaign Draws Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism-168/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism-168/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:56:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Ford &#8216;Fiesta Movement&#8217; a social media experiment or just a sponsored buzz machine? &#171; ToughSledding</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351656</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Ford &#8216;Fiesta Movement&#8217; a social media experiment or just a sponsored buzz machine? &#171; ToughSledding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensepr.com/2007/05/31/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism/#comment-351656</guid>
		<description>[...] sort of blogola that&#8217;s created huge dust-ups back in &#8216;07. For some background, try  here, here and here. Simply put, by offering a free car, free fuel and free insurance to the agents, Ford [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sort of blogola that&#8217;s created huge dust-ups back in &#8216;07. For some background, try  here, here and here. Simply put, by offering a free car, free fuel and free insurance to the agents, Ford [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Freebies Journalists (and Bloggers) Still Take</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351655</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Freebies Journalists (and Bloggers) Still Take</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 05:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensepr.com/2007/05/31/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism/#comment-351655</guid>
		<description>[...] of interest. See Toby Bloomberg on schwag-for-post, Scentzilla on perfume per-for-post, and my previous posts on the Nikon blogger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of interest. See Toby Bloomberg on schwag-for-post, Scentzilla on perfume per-for-post, and my previous posts on the Nikon blogger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351653</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensepr.com/2007/05/31/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism/#comment-351653</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s hypocritically self-serving of PR professionals to criticize this. Sure... it&#039;s fine for companies to pay a PR person to convince bloggers to talk about their product, but as soon as they cut out the middleman...

They could send out 1,000 cameras for what it costs to try to get a PR person to reach out to 1,000 bloggers. Which scenario is better for the company? Which scenario is better for bloggers?

Let market forces decide this. Readers will either trust their favorite bloggers or they won&#039;t, and those are risk the blogger can decide for themselves when considering whether to accept the offer and whether or not to disclose about it when posting. I don&#039;t feel any safer as a consumer because a few self-appointed watchdogs are telling me not to trust someone because they accepted a free camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s hypocritically self-serving of PR professionals to criticize this. Sure&#8230; it&#8217;s fine for companies to pay a PR person to convince bloggers to talk about their product, but as soon as they cut out the middleman&#8230;</p>
<p>They could send out 1,000 cameras for what it costs to try to get a PR person to reach out to 1,000 bloggers. Which scenario is better for the company? Which scenario is better for bloggers?</p>
<p>Let market forces decide this. Readers will either trust their favorite bloggers or they won&#8217;t, and those are risk the blogger can decide for themselves when considering whether to accept the offer and whether or not to disclose about it when posting. I don&#8217;t feel any safer as a consumer because a few self-appointed watchdogs are telling me not to trust someone because they accepted a free camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism-168/comment-page-1/#comment-351654</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensepr.com/2007/05/31/nikon-blogger-campaign-draws-criticism/#comment-351654</guid>
		<description>&quot;Eric,&quot;

As to your quote: &quot;Before finally sinking into name calling and contradiction (in place of debate)&quot;... what do you call that?!

Excuse me but: 1) what are you talking about; 2) what&#039;s the context; and 3) who the fuck are you and what do you know?

Sincerely,

- Amanda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Eric,&#8221;</p>
<p>As to your quote: &#8220;Before finally sinking into name calling and contradiction (in place of debate)&#8221;&#8230; what do you call that?!</p>
<p>Excuse me but: 1) what are you talking about; 2) what&#8217;s the context; and 3) who the fuck are you and what do you know?</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>- Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>