<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six ways to make a good e-mail signature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:29:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why oh why</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347120</link>
		<dc:creator>Why oh why</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347120</guid>
		<description>And I do see the comments above.  But I disagree that forwarded emails do not retain the signature.  Every forwarded mail I get at least has a signature from the original sender.  It all depends on how you have your options set in email; to add the sig to a reply/forward or not.  You are probably right about Lotus Notes though, no experience with that here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I do see the comments above.  But I disagree that forwarded emails do not retain the signature.  Every forwarded mail I get at least has a signature from the original sender.  It all depends on how you have your options set in email; to add the sig to a reply/forward or not.  You are probably right about Lotus Notes though, no experience with that here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why oh why</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347119</link>
		<dc:creator>Why oh why</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347119</guid>
		<description>I am about two years too late.  But why in the hell would anyone put their email in their email signature?  It makes no freaking sense. &lt;--Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am about two years too late.  But why in the hell would anyone put their email in their email signature?  It makes no freaking sense. &lt;&#8211;Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prafuldass</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347118</link>
		<dc:creator>prafuldass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347118</guid>
		<description>The best tutorial i&#039;ve seen on this site. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best tutorial i&#8217;ve seen on this site. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg tomas</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347117</link>
		<dc:creator>greg tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347117</guid>
		<description>I made a proxy site myself, I believe the right to privacy on the internet is important, new ruling about the police in britain being able to hack into people compmuters without warrant is crazy. Anyone remeber george orwells 1984?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a proxy site myself, I believe the right to privacy on the internet is important, new ruling about the police in britain being able to hack into people compmuters without warrant is crazy. Anyone remeber george orwells 1984?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: money-saving-tips</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347116</link>
		<dc:creator>money-saving-tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347116</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm that&#039;s cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm that&#8217;s cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolmyam.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 7 Ways to Make a good e-mail signature</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347115</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolmyam.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 7 Ways to Make a good e-mail signature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347115</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/     theories [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/</a>     theories [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dingle</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347114</link>
		<dc:creator>dingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347114</guid>
		<description>&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt; good point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt; good point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347113</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347113</guid>
		<description>Some of you are missing the point of putting your email address in the sig:  Emails that are printed or forwarded will lose this information, and some mail clients (Lotus Notes) make it a little obtuse to see the sender&#039;s email address.  I have been in the situation of having a person&#039;s email but not his email address, and that can be more annoying than you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you are missing the point of putting your email address in the sig:  Emails that are printed or forwarded will lose this information, and some mail clients (Lotus Notes) make it a little obtuse to see the sender&#8217;s email address.  I have been in the situation of having a person&#8217;s email but not his email address, and that can be more annoying than you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After The Dot Net &#187; After The Net - The next generation Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347112</link>
		<dc:creator>After The Dot Net &#187; After The Net - The next generation Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347112</guid>
		<description>[...] signature can be incorporated using different methods. The idea is to be unique and eye catching. Pimp your work has a good post that gives you options and best practices for email signature development. If you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] signature can be incorporated using different methods. The idea is to be unique and eye catching. Pimp your work has a good post that gives you options and best practices for email signature development. If you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian W</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature-169/comment-page-2/#comment-347111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pimpyourwork.com/six-ways-to-make-a-good-e-mail-signature/#comment-347111</guid>
		<description>Randall (of the &#039;I want my advertising in this comments page&#039; school, but you raise reasonable points):

The reason not to jazz up a signature is because it&#039;s a signature.  It&#039;s not mail content, it&#039;s the same in every mail you send.  The interesting bit of the mail is what you want to send that&#039;s unique to that mail, the content itself.  So why draw the reader away from it with a 72pt flashing name with alien glow effect?

On the 8, 7, 5 line thing: netiquette is *3* lines, 72 characters max per line.  Admittedly this dates back to 80x25 text screens, but if you&#039;re putting in name/job title/phone numbers, why would you put one piece of information per line:

-- 
John Smith, Senior wombat fiddler, Acme Inc
Office: +1 234 567 8901 Cell: +1 234 567 8902

2 lines, all people want...  You could add your preferred email address - it&#039;s in the message headers already, but modern clients tend to &#039;helpfully&#039; hide it from view, particularly when printed.


Generally: yes, HTML is supported, but there&#039;s rarely much point to use it in emails.  When I receive emails in bizarre nonstandard fonts, it looks like tarted up spam.  I know what font I like to read my messages in - and when an email arrives in plaintext I get to choose.  I might be poorly sighted or have a super high res monitor, and 12/10/9pt would then be far too small, for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall (of the &#8216;I want my advertising in this comments page&#8217; school, but you raise reasonable points):</p>
<p>The reason not to jazz up a signature is because it&#8217;s a signature.  It&#8217;s not mail content, it&#8217;s the same in every mail you send.  The interesting bit of the mail is what you want to send that&#8217;s unique to that mail, the content itself.  So why draw the reader away from it with a 72pt flashing name with alien glow effect?</p>
<p>On the 8, 7, 5 line thing: netiquette is *3* lines, 72 characters max per line.  Admittedly this dates back to 80&#215;25 text screens, but if you&#8217;re putting in name/job title/phone numbers, why would you put one piece of information per line:</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
John Smith, Senior wombat fiddler, Acme Inc<br />
Office: +1 234 567 8901 Cell: +1 234 567 8902</p>
<p>2 lines, all people want&#8230;  You could add your preferred email address &#8211; it&#8217;s in the message headers already, but modern clients tend to &#8216;helpfully&#8217; hide it from view, particularly when printed.</p>
<p>Generally: yes, HTML is supported, but there&#8217;s rarely much point to use it in emails.  When I receive emails in bizarre nonstandard fonts, it looks like tarted up spam.  I know what font I like to read my messages in &#8211; and when an email arrives in plaintext I get to choose.  I might be poorly sighted or have a super high res monitor, and 12/10/9pt would then be far too small, for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>