<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mis-Use of Twitter Direct Messages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:31:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: $40 Dollar Blackberry Phones</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324247</link>
		<dc:creator>$40 Dollar Blackberry Phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324247</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or do some of the Twitter folk seem to have a way of instantly sending a Direct Message immediately after you follow them.  I honestly don&#039;t know of a way to do this, but you click follow, and.3 seconds later, you have, not only the standard issue &quot;Twitter&quot; email, but a direct message from the person you are now following...and 99.9% of the time it will have a message saying &quot;Hey, I&#039;m Cool...Check out My Cool Site www.heyi&#039;mcool.com and be cool with me and my cool friends.

While I like the idea of Twitter, there are some annoyances that make me wonder if it&#039;s worth being a part of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or do some of the Twitter folk seem to have a way of instantly sending a Direct Message immediately after you follow them.  I honestly don&#8217;t know of a way to do this, but you click follow, and.3 seconds later, you have, not only the standard issue &#8220;Twitter&#8221; email, but a direct message from the person you are now following&#8230;and 99.9% of the time it will have a message saying &#8220;Hey, I&#8217;m Cool&#8230;Check out My Cool Site <a href="http://www.heyi" rel="nofollow">http://www.heyi</a>&#8216;mcool.com and be cool with me and my cool friends.</p>
<p>While I like the idea of Twitter, there are some annoyances that make me wonder if it&#8217;s worth being a part of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324194</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324194</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s def a lesson to be learned here - if you&#039;re going to message people with a link to your blog and a &quot;thank you for following,&quot; it should be personal, not just a generic message. I mean, if you want people to visit your blog, you should visit theirs. I try to send messages that say something like &quot;thanks for following. I noticed you wrote a networking blog. I wrote about green networking a few months ago here&quot; with a link. I think if more people did it like that, it would be less annoying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s def a lesson to be learned here &#8211; if you&#8217;re going to message people with a link to your blog and a &#8220;thank you for following,&#8221; it should be personal, not just a generic message. I mean, if you want people to visit your blog, you should visit theirs. I try to send messages that say something like &#8220;thanks for following. I noticed you wrote a networking blog. I wrote about green networking a few months ago here&#8221; with a link. I think if more people did it like that, it would be less annoying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324189</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324189</guid>
		<description>@Matt - you were right, which is why I editied it. :) 

@Stacy - there&#039;s just far too many of them in my world... 

@Simon - that&#039;ll be my next post, I promise. :) I&#039;ll go over everything. I had trouble trying to figure it out at first too. 

@Warren - no problem. :) glad you liked it... 

@Raul - but that&#039;s part of what Twitter is about. Doesn&#039;t matter if people don&#039;t want to see them .... the replies and conversations on Twitter - for me at least - is what it&#039;s about. 

@Lindsay - See, that&#039;s different, because you&#039;re using Twitter as part of your recruiting tactics. The people who are DM&#039;ing me their blog links are just random folk, who know nothing about what I am interested in because they don&#039;t take the time to listen to what I say first.... So I get random and bizarre links. I can totally understand the way you&#039;re using it. 

@Allison - fair enough... :) I&#039;m not getting it that way tho, I&#039;m just getting &quot;here&#039;s my blog&quot; and I&#039;m finding that I&#039;m getting so many of them, before anyone has actually said anything to me first is frustrating, especially when it feels like they haven&#039;t bothered to find out what I&#039;m even interested in... it&#039;s just been frustrating I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt &#8211; you were right, which is why I editied it. :) </p>
<p>@Stacy &#8211; there&#8217;s just far too many of them in my world&#8230; </p>
<p>@Simon &#8211; that&#8217;ll be my next post, I promise. :) I&#8217;ll go over everything. I had trouble trying to figure it out at first too. </p>
<p>@Warren &#8211; no problem. :) glad you liked it&#8230; </p>
<p>@Raul &#8211; but that&#8217;s part of what Twitter is about. Doesn&#8217;t matter if people don&#8217;t want to see them &#8230;. the replies and conversations on Twitter &#8211; for me at least &#8211; is what it&#8217;s about. </p>
<p>@Lindsay &#8211; See, that&#8217;s different, because you&#8217;re using Twitter as part of your recruiting tactics. The people who are DM&#8217;ing me their blog links are just random folk, who know nothing about what I am interested in because they don&#8217;t take the time to listen to what I say first&#8230;. So I get random and bizarre links. I can totally understand the way you&#8217;re using it. </p>
<p>@Allison &#8211; fair enough&#8230; :) I&#8217;m not getting it that way tho, I&#8217;m just getting &#8220;here&#8217;s my blog&#8221; and I&#8217;m finding that I&#8217;m getting so many of them, before anyone has actually said anything to me first is frustrating, especially when it feels like they haven&#8217;t bothered to find out what I&#8217;m even interested in&#8230; it&#8217;s just been frustrating I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324206</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324206</guid>
		<description>I somewhat disagree with you. I hate DM spam that means nothing, but I def don&#039;t mind when someone sends me a DM the first time I start to follow them. Something like &quot;hey, thanks for following me. here&#039;s a link that represents what I write about&quot; isn&#039;t annoying to me. I actually think it is polite to acknowledge someone new is following you. 

Of course, is someone is constantly DM&#039;ing me for no reason other than to send me links, that&#039;s another thing.

Well, I have to say, though, that I don&#039;t following everyone following me. I only follow the select people who interest me - less than 50 people. So, I guess subscribing to 1000 people at once and getting messages from all of them would be overwhelming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somewhat disagree with you. I hate DM spam that means nothing, but I def don&#8217;t mind when someone sends me a DM the first time I start to follow them. Something like &#8220;hey, thanks for following me. here&#8217;s a link that represents what I write about&#8221; isn&#8217;t annoying to me. I actually think it is polite to acknowledge someone new is following you. </p>
<p>Of course, is someone is constantly DM&#8217;ing me for no reason other than to send me links, that&#8217;s another thing.</p>
<p>Well, I have to say, though, that I don&#8217;t following everyone following me. I only follow the select people who interest me &#8211; less than 50 people. So, I guess subscribing to 1000 people at once and getting messages from all of them would be overwhelming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324103</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324103</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of the guilty people who thanks my followers with a direct message. I always send a DM with my email address included so if they want to contact me for something more personal or needs to write more than 140 characters. I&#039;m a recruiter in the PR industry and most of my followers are PR pros. I tweet publicly, but as a first start and to initiate a conversation with a new follower I don&#039;t already know, I figure a direct message more discreet than drawing attention and letting everyone else know this person is interested what @PRjobs has to say... like the boss or other colleagues. Given my profession, I think it puts some of my followers at ease. But maybe I&#039;m wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of the guilty people who thanks my followers with a direct message. I always send a DM with my email address included so if they want to contact me for something more personal or needs to write more than 140 characters. I&#8217;m a recruiter in the PR industry and most of my followers are PR pros. I tweet publicly, but as a first start and to initiate a conversation with a new follower I don&#8217;t already know, I figure a direct message more discreet than drawing attention and letting everyone else know this person is interested what @PRjobs has to say&#8230; like the boss or other colleagues. Given my profession, I think it puts some of my followers at ease. But maybe I&#8217;m wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324090</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324090</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to use more DMs as a way of talking to people, as I know that I tend to do @ replies a lot and people don&#039;t want to see those necessarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to use more DMs as a way of talking to people, as I know that I tend to do @ replies a lot and people don&#8217;t want to see those necessarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Sukernek</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324089</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Sukernek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324089</guid>
		<description>Colleen,

Great point about DM spam.  I use the DM as you described, just as a short 1:1 private message to someone else that the whole Twitterverse does not need to know about.  Thanks for the reminder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colleen,</p>
<p>Great point about DM spam.  I use the DM as you described, just as a short 1:1 private message to someone else that the whole Twitterverse does not need to know about.  Thanks for the reminder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Young</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324098</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324098</guid>
		<description>I got a VERY weird DM today: 

 Just wanted to send you the bannar ads for my company. Did not want u to think I&#039;m a spammer. 

WTF? 

Anyway, how do you get the &quot;attention&quot; thing on Tweetdeck? Sounds like exactly what I need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a VERY weird DM today: </p>
<p> Just wanted to send you the bannar ads for my company. Did not want u to think I&#8217;m a spammer. </p>
<p>WTF? </p>
<p>Anyway, how do you get the &#8220;attention&#8221; thing on Tweetdeck? Sounds like exactly what I need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324097</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324097</guid>
		<description>I must  concur. I don&#039;t know how many &quot;Thanks for the follow, here&#039;s my blog&quot; DMs I get. I&#039;m not social-media retarded. If I found somebody to follow on Twitter in the first place, I know where to look to find a link to their site.

Lately I&#039;ve been getting a lot of &quot;Vote for ____, go to http://_____&quot; and &quot;I&#039;m doing a walk for [insert charity here], check out my page &amp; support the cause!&quot; 

Wouldn&#039;t these people think that if they&#039;re trying to fund-raise or get votes, a PUBLIC tweet would me just a tad more effective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must  concur. I don&#8217;t know how many &#8220;Thanks for the follow, here&#8217;s my blog&#8221; DMs I get. I&#8217;m not social-media retarded. If I found somebody to follow on Twitter in the first place, I know where to look to find a link to their site.</p>
<p>Lately I&#8217;ve been getting a lot of &#8220;Vote for ____, go to <a href="http://_____" rel="nofollow">http://_____</a>&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m doing a walk for [insert charity here], check out my page &amp; support the cause!&#8221; </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t these people think that if they&#8217;re trying to fund-raise or get votes, a PUBLIC tweet would me just a tad more effective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Blalock</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-324102</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Blalock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-mis-use-of-twitter-direct-messages/#comment-324102</guid>
		<description>Well, you never actually say what they are for... I honestly don&#039;t know. I tend to use them when I want to say something out of public, but I also get those stupid DMs, and you&#039;re right, its annoying as hell. 

Maybe we should point out directly what they are for... :)

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you never actually say what they are for&#8230; I honestly don&#8217;t know. I tend to use them when I want to say something out of public, but I also get those stupid DMs, and you&#8217;re right, its annoying as hell. </p>
<p>Maybe we should point out directly what they are for&#8230; :)</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>