<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The NYT reports, We&#8217;re Scared of Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-nyt-reports-were-scared-of-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-nyt-reports-were-scared-of-google/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:28:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Mullings</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/the-nyt-reports-were-scared-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-324170</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mullings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/the-nyt-reports-were-scared-of-google/#comment-324170</guid>
		<description>I would say that the NYT is extremely worried, especially as their newspaper property revenues continue to decline.

Revenue from the web could be hurt by Knol because the articles rank higher than about.com articles, thus sending traffic to Google&#039;s property instead.

Can Google be trusted to remain totally objective?

I would use the YouTube case to decide - Ever notice that youtube videos seem to be the only ones that show up with images, making them more likely to catch your eye?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that the NYT is extremely worried, especially as their newspaper property revenues continue to decline.</p>
<p>Revenue from the web could be hurt by Knol because the articles rank higher than about.com articles, thus sending traffic to Google&#8217;s property instead.</p>
<p>Can Google be trusted to remain totally objective?</p>
<p>I would use the YouTube case to decide &#8211; Ever notice that youtube videos seem to be the only ones that show up with images, making them more likely to catch your eye?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
