<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today Seth MacFarlane, Tomorrow YouTube Partners?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/today-seth-macfarlane-tomorrow-youtube-partners-184/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/today-seth-macfarlane-tomorrow-youtube-partners-184/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:35:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Abundo</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/today-seth-macfarlane-tomorrow-youtube-partners-184/comment-page-1/#comment-29124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2008/06/30/today-seth-macfarlane-tomorrow-youtube-partners/#comment-29124</guid>
		<description>Good question, Daisy. That would be rather &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116379821933826657-0mbjXoHnQwDMFH_PVeb_jqe3Chk_20061125.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;peanut butter&lt;/a&gt; of them, wouldn&#039;t it?

While a Hollywood name would indeed attract advertisers, you have to wonder why Google didn&#039;t recruit video creators they &lt;strong&gt;already&lt;/strong&gt; have contracts with through YouTube.

Filtering this deal down to YouTube partners, if ever, would be a top-down approach. Google isn&#039;t known for top-down approaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, Daisy. That would be rather <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116379821933826657-0mbjXoHnQwDMFH_PVeb_jqe3Chk_20061125.html" rel="nofollow">peanut butter</a> of them, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>While a Hollywood name would indeed attract advertisers, you have to wonder why Google didn&#8217;t recruit video creators they <strong>already</strong> have contracts with through YouTube.</p>
<p>Filtering this deal down to YouTube partners, if ever, would be a top-down approach. Google isn&#8217;t known for top-down approaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daisy Whitney</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/today-seth-macfarlane-tomorrow-youtube-partners-184/comment-page-1/#comment-29123</link>
		<dc:creator>Daisy Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideonlinevideo.com/2008/06/30/today-seth-macfarlane-tomorrow-youtube-partners/#comment-29123</guid>
		<description>Is Google competing with YouTube at all here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Google competing with YouTube at all here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
