Skip to content

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

Twitter’s Monetization Strategy

November 17, 2008 by Colleen Coplick  
Filed under Social Media

Hi again! I’m back from my whirlwind trip to the south, (or the upper south as some referred to it as), and I’m getting back into the swing of things!

I was on the flight home last night and going through my usual pre- and post-trip blogging workflow practice, and came across and article on CNet about Evan William’s presentation at Web 2.0 recently. While Williams didn’t give a straight answer to The Valley’s biggest question (though, did you really expect he would? He never gives a straight answer, always holding his cards close to his chest): ‘How will you make money??’ Caroline McCarthy reports that Williams gave some strong hint, and that hint didn’t include advertising.

Overall, it’s looking like Twitter is going to look at a corporate model, where companies like Woot and Zappos, who are already using the service, will be charged for a corporate account.

Williams is still maintaining that Twitter is simply a communications channel, and not a community, which still bugs me. I am of the mind that he’s not really seeing the big picture – sure, Twitter may have started out as a simple communications tool, but it’s morphed into something much more.

Twitter could give corporations access to analytics and data unavailable in free Twitter accounts, something that could undoubtedly be enhanced by its acquisition of search app Summize earlier this year. [source]

However Twitter decides they’re going to start making money, I’m thinking that perhaps the sooner they roll out that model, the better, at least so the naysayers and pundits stop speculating, which is resulting in some slightly bad press.

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • BallHype
  • YardBarker

Comments

2 Responses to “Twitter’s Monetization Strategy”
  1. Colleen says:

    How are they gonna know who is a company and who is not? I mean sure, microsoft obviously is but what about a hobby blogger? what about a consultant who just tweets for fun? I would hate to have to buy a corporate license for the privilege of tweeting. I wouldn’t. If they aren’t careful they could change the landscape of the twitterverse big time.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...


Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for EveryJoe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.