Skip to content

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Using Wikipedia: An Important Lesson

May 12, 2009 by Allison Boyer  
Filed under Jobs

Any good writer knows that Wikipedia isn’t a reliable source. I still use it, and I’m not ashamed about that. With so many contributors and editors, much of the information on that site is correct, and because there are links to sources, I find that it is a good starting point when doing research.

Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia founder. Image: Newscom

Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia founder. Image: Newscom

“Starting point.”

Unfortunately, for many writers, it is an ending point as well, and that’s where problems come into play. This past March, a Dublin student decided to run a little experiment. When a famous French composer died, Shane Fitzgerald made up a cheesy quote that would specifically appeal to obit writers and attributed it to the composer on Wikipedia. Although the quote was taken down by editors within minutes since it was not sourced, journalists gobbled it up. Ad, since online media sources had already snagged the quote, people began re-adding it to the Wikipedia page. It was taken down for not having an original source multiple times.

But the quote lived on, and Fitzgerald finally decided to contact major news outlets to out himself and come clean about the phoney phrase. He says that he’s convinced it never would have been discovered as fake had he not come forward.

We’ve all done it – snagged a fact, quote, etc. from Wikipedia or another online source without looking into the origin. If you’ve never done it..well, you’re a better person than I am. That doesn’t mean I’m a bad writer, and I do try very hard to make sure that whatever I write had been fully researched. We all make mistakes, though, and sometimes we see a bit of information that sounds so true we don’t question it.

Please, dear readers, question EVERYTHING you read online, even if you’re on a source that seems reliable.

I think the lesson people are getting from this is to not use Wikipedia, but that’s not the issue. You just have to use it carefully – and you should be using ANY online source carefully, as though it was a Wikipedia page. Unless you’re hearing something straight from the horse’s mouth, you can’t be sure if the information you’re reading is correct. After all, maybe the writer hired by that legitimate .org website you’re reading got HIS quotes from Wikipedia!

And as freelance writers, online content quality control is, in part, our responsibility…but that’s an argument for another day.

Like what you’re reading here? Sign up for Allison’s One Prompt, One Product weekly newsletter.

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • BallHype
  • YardBarker

Comments

5 Responses to “Using Wikipedia: An Important Lesson”
  1. Debbi says:

    So true . . . wasn’t it Mark Twain who said a lie will go halfway around the world before the truth can pull its boots on? Or something similar. (Don’t quote me on that. :)) And this was even before the Web.

  2. Gregory Kohs says:

    To quote the blogger Allison Boyer:
    “I still use is (sic), and I’m not ashamed about that.”

    Sigh…

  3. Anne Wayman says:

    Ah yes, Wikipedia! And it so often shows up first on a search. I use it as a starting point as you say. Often there are people, quotes, sources, etc. that are truly useful.

    Otoh, I just used it to figure out how long the web has been around – that allowed me to say in a guest post I’m putting together ‘early 90s’ because I don’t remember the date at all even though it was me I was talking about.

    For quick and dirty facts or approximations like this Wikipedia can work like a charm.

    And yes, if we could only get all readers as well as all writers to question everything.

    Sigh!

    A

  4. DM says:

    Why only online? Some of the same journalists that wrote these articles, copying from Wikipedia, also write for newspapers. If they have the habit of not double-checking information, then falsehoods may easily slip into the paper publications that they work for.

    Face it, a lot of books are poorly researched, particularly on “side issues” (not the central topic of the book).

  5. Allison Boyer says:

    Excellent point, DM. Any kind of writing you do, you need to research every fact.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for EveryJoe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.