<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weblogs, Inc Model vs. Gawker Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:55:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob G.</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=75#comment-333570</guid>
		<description>I think that both have successful models.  I am prone to like the Gawker model a little better right off the bat for one reason.  From a management perspective it has got to be a lot easier to take care of.  70 sites has got to be a lot of trouble to keep track of.  Although, if what you are creating is lucrative, you can always hire people to keep an eye on everything.

Both are definitely nice companies, just with completely different strategies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that both have successful models.  I am prone to like the Gawker model a little better right off the bat for one reason.  From a management perspective it has got to be a lot easier to take care of.  70 sites has got to be a lot of trouble to keep track of.  Although, if what you are creating is lucrative, you can always hire people to keep an eye on everything.</p>
<p>Both are definitely nice companies, just with completely different strategies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Latham</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333571</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Latham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=75#comment-333571</guid>
		<description>Well if your trying to get some ideas, you have already thought of what I was thinking. With the 9rules Network, you will most likely want to take factors from each of these models; refine, tweak, test, and perfect your own model.

I&#039;m sure you have great and innovative ideas you are just waiting to test out; but likewise you are wise, thus you are going to take your time, and stick to what you know at first.

Obviously, both of them have great techniques within their models; so the natural instinct would be to take both of their business models and cram them together, and make a super model (wow, a play on words). And I am sure this would work...up until the moment it failed.

You would think billions of sites...great...high quality content...great. But how long can this high quality, and high quantity ratio maintain itself? Even on sites where you have others working along side of you, it would become hard to maintain this.

The decision is quality v. quantity, which is the reason you opened the doors to the 9rules Network to begging with right? If you have a bunch of individuals maintain their own website, or a handful of them. It is a lot easier to present a greater quantity of high quality sites; than it is with a double digit number trying to maintain damn near a triple digit amount of sites.

However, I personally prefer Gawker over WIN because the content is of a higher quality. And in the end, quality is more important that quantity. I could die tomorrow at the &quot;quantity&quot; (age of) 20, and would feel like I have lived a quality that far surpasses that. Applies the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if your trying to get some ideas, you have already thought of what I was thinking. With the 9rules Network, you will most likely want to take factors from each of these models; refine, tweak, test, and perfect your own model.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you have great and innovative ideas you are just waiting to test out; but likewise you are wise, thus you are going to take your time, and stick to what you know at first.</p>
<p>Obviously, both of them have great techniques within their models; so the natural instinct would be to take both of their business models and cram them together, and make a super model (wow, a play on words). And I am sure this would work&#8230;up until the moment it failed.</p>
<p>You would think billions of sites&#8230;great&#8230;high quality content&#8230;great. But how long can this high quality, and high quantity ratio maintain itself? Even on sites where you have others working along side of you, it would become hard to maintain this.</p>
<p>The decision is quality v. quantity, which is the reason you opened the doors to the 9rules Network to begging with right? If you have a bunch of individuals maintain their own website, or a handful of them. It is a lot easier to present a greater quantity of high quality sites; than it is with a double digit number trying to maintain damn near a triple digit amount of sites.</p>
<p>However, I personally prefer Gawker over WIN because the content is of a higher quality. And in the end, quality is more important that quantity. I could die tomorrow at the &#8220;quantity&#8221; (age of) 20, and would feel like I have lived a quality that far surpasses that. Applies the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333572</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=75#comment-333572</guid>
		<description>We do both models actually... Engadget, Joystiq, and Autoblog are much bigger then Gizmodo, Kotaku, and Jalopnik as an example. So, we have the big, high-quality sites, as well as the hyper niche sites, like www.divester.com.

I think having the long tail is the model... some stuff towards the left of the tail gets a lot of traffic, and the stuff on the right of the big stuff gets higher CPM with less traffic.

at least that is the concept :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do both models actually&#8230; Engadget, Joystiq, and Autoblog are much bigger then Gizmodo, Kotaku, and Jalopnik as an example. So, we have the big, high-quality sites, as well as the hyper niche sites, like <a href="http://www.divester.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.divester.com</a>.</p>
<p>I think having the long tail is the model&#8230; some stuff towards the left of the tail gets a lot of traffic, and the stuff on the right of the big stuff gets higher CPM with less traffic.</p>
<p>at least that is the concept :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Rowse</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333573</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=75#comment-333573</guid>
		<description>Good post mate, lots of food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post mate, lots of food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flaschner</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333574</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flaschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=75#comment-333574</guid>
		<description>Jason beat me to the long tail argument. I&#039;m new to this discussion (aren&#039;t we all), so I don&#039;t have a history of success or failure to back my predictions, but I&#039;d bet on the long tail. Why? Three reasons:

Odds: what are the odds of getting a site into the top 10%? Limited. What are the odds of getting 10 sites into the top 30%? Better.

Longevity: Tastes change. Writers grow stale. One hot property today may drop over time. The tail will always exist, and will only grow over time.

Potential for growth: As above, it comes down to math. 

Of course, the two models are not mutually exclusive. Which is best ultimately comes down to the management abilities and tools of the network owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason beat me to the long tail argument. I&#8217;m new to this discussion (aren&#8217;t we all), so I don&#8217;t have a history of success or failure to back my predictions, but I&#8217;d bet on the long tail. Why? Three reasons:</p>
<p>Odds: what are the odds of getting a site into the top 10%? Limited. What are the odds of getting 10 sites into the top 30%? Better.</p>
<p>Longevity: Tastes change. Writers grow stale. One hot property today may drop over time. The tail will always exist, and will only grow over time.</p>
<p>Potential for growth: As above, it comes down to math. </p>
<p>Of course, the two models are not mutually exclusive. Which is best ultimately comes down to the management abilities and tools of the network owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333575</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=75#comment-333575</guid>
		<description>Long tail. Good point. I have nothing else to say.

What I am curious about is if Engadget, Joystiq, and Autoblog, posted the same number of entries per day, how would their traffic compare to the &quot;competition&quot; over at Gawker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long tail. Good point. I have nothing else to say.</p>
<p>What I am curious about is if Engadget, Joystiq, and Autoblog, posted the same number of entries per day, how would their traffic compare to the &#8220;competition&#8221; over at Gawker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanti</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/weblogs-inc-model-vs-gawker-model-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333576</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=75#comment-333576</guid>
		<description>Long tail... that&#039;s our business model all the way.  (niner niner)

As a tiny upstart, we could never compete with Engadget, etc.

That&#039;s why we&#039;re starting off with High Heels and Medical Privacy.  Just random Long Tail niches.

So far, we&#039;re doing alright.  It just takes time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long tail&#8230; that&#8217;s our business model all the way.  (niner niner)</p>
<p>As a tiny upstart, we could never compete with Engadget, etc.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we&#8217;re starting off with High Heels and Medical Privacy.  Just random Long Tail niches.</p>
<p>So far, we&#8217;re doing alright.  It just takes time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>