<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Microsoft Doing with Hot-or-Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:27:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quikboy</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-127606</link>
		<dc:creator>Quikboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/#comment-127606</guid>
		<description>Who knows? I think this type of scale is pretty weak though. It could be much more harder to make a choice for many, so it&#039;s not as simple. I think a thumbs up/down rating or a 5 star rating (with halves included) would make a better rating system than a scale of 1-10 for superficial things like beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows? I think this type of scale is pretty weak though. It could be much more harder to make a choice for many, so it&#8217;s not as simple. I think a thumbs up/down rating or a 5 star rating (with halves included) would make a better rating system than a scale of 1-10 for superficial things like beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>