<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s up with Animated Logos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-up-with-animated-logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-up-with-animated-logos/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:09:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samantha Hartley</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-up-with-animated-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-322121</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandcurve.com/whats-up-with-animated-logos/#comment-322121</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post, Susan!  I wanted to blog last year about the amazing logo for then-CourtTV that was animated and mimicked the DNA charts with a line of tiny lozenge shapes.  I thought it was fun to watch the logo in action - not too distracting like some of these.  When I went to find it online, however, I saw they had another logo there, with a fingerprint.  Not sure how you can build a brand effectively with two drastically different logos.  The DNA logo is still my favorite, but as with the ones you&#039;re reviewing here, the old rules still apply: the logo must be on-strategy for the brand, compelling and consistently applied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post, Susan!  I wanted to blog last year about the amazing logo for then-CourtTV that was animated and mimicked the DNA charts with a line of tiny lozenge shapes.  I thought it was fun to watch the logo in action &#8211; not too distracting like some of these.  When I went to find it online, however, I saw they had another logo there, with a fingerprint.  Not sure how you can build a brand effectively with two drastically different logos.  The DNA logo is still my favorite, but as with the ones you&#8217;re reviewing here, the old rules still apply: the logo must be on-strategy for the brand, compelling and consistently applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Training Brand Influencers</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-up-with-animated-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-321115</link>
		<dc:creator>Training Brand Influencers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandcurve.com/whats-up-with-animated-logos/#comment-321115</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ll be interested to see what other companies open brand &#8220;universities&#8221; for consumers.  Will this become the next big thing, bigger than animated logos? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll be interested to see what other companies open brand &#8220;universities&#8221; for consumers.  Will this become the next big thing, bigger than animated logos? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Posey</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-up-with-animated-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-321199</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Posey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandcurve.com/whats-up-with-animated-logos/#comment-321199</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to agree with you on this one-if anything, simply because this is not a particularly groundbreaking trick that, as you noted, can just be distracting, especially on TV (maybe better for web). If everyone&#039;s going to jump on the bandwagon, perhaps it could be about something a little more complex and meaningful? (Now, if i could only think of what that might be!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to agree with you on this one-if anything, simply because this is not a particularly groundbreaking trick that, as you noted, can just be distracting, especially on TV (maybe better for web). If everyone&#8217;s going to jump on the bandwagon, perhaps it could be about something a little more complex and meaningful? (Now, if i could only think of what that might be!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Seay</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/whats-up-with-animated-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-322118</link>
		<dc:creator>James Seay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandcurve.com/whats-up-with-animated-logos/#comment-322118</guid>
		<description>Nice post! In some cases, I believe the animated logo can work. For example, in my opinion the SwissCom logo adds a certain element to the brand personality. Unlike the Discovery Channel (which IS annoying) the logo promotes brand image while differentiating itself from other telecommunications companies. Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post! In some cases, I believe the animated logo can work. For example, in my opinion the SwissCom logo adds a certain element to the brand personality. Unlike the Discovery Channel (which IS annoying) the logo promotes brand image while differentiating itself from other telecommunications companies. Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>