Skip to content

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Who put the “HD” in “HD Radio”?

July 28, 2008 by Christopher Swenson  
Filed under Electronics

HD Radio LogoLike many people, I’ve recently been hearing more and more about this new thing on the air waves called HD Radio. What is it we are talking about here?

Well, first off, the HD does not stand for “high definition” (it seems to stand for nothing — it’s just a marketing ploy), and it doesn’t provide anything like HD quality. The second most important part is that you have to have a special receiver to get these, which are still a tad expensive and aren’t standard equipment on much of anything yet.

What does it give you? It gives you the potential for a 300 kbps audio stream. In reality you get little more than 100 kbps of total capacity, which is often split up into multiple channels.

So, there are some goods here: we can cram two or three FM-quality broadcasts in some of the extra bandwidth around current FM transmissions. There is also pressure for these stations to remain commercial-free for a bit longer to increase adoptions, but it won’t last: the service is intended to be free, like current AM/FM stations, so it will have to be ad-supported in the future.

There are a lot of “buts” though:

  • It’s proprietary. The only way to make or receive the transmissions on equipment is to pay a royalty to the company that owns the technology, iBiquity.
  • It has all of the faults of terrestrial radio. The same problems you have with AM and FM stations will stay with these HD Radio stations. HD Radio is supposed to be some sort of response to satellite radio providers, but is still limited to your local area and whatever music they decide to put on.
  • There have been some complaints that the HD Radio signals are incredibly weak, faint, and interfere with other signals because of the way they are transmitted.
  • Quality isn’t much better than satellite. I was an XM subscriber for a while, and their audio bitrates were typically 40 kbps for the popular music channels, and less (8–24 for stations like news, etc.). Although HD Radio has the potential to exceed this, the providers are more likely to just populate the bandwidth with more channels, giving about the same quality as satellite providers.
  • No one knows about them! If no one figures out or cares enough about them, then they will just die.

Personally, unless iBiquity can get HD Radios into every new car that comes out, I don’t see it as being a lasting business: DOA. Satellite is better in almost every way, and is already an installable option in many vehicles nowadays.

And it certainly isn’t HD.

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • BallHype
  • YardBarker

Comments

3 Responses to “Who put the “HD” in “HD Radio”?”
  1. PocketRadio says:

    “Hybrid Digital/Analog, Not High Definition”

    “Most Americans, including reporters and editors, think that HD Radio stands for High Definition radio, a natural assumption given our experience of HDTV, High Definition TV. Wrong… I would have to call it intentionally misleading. The deceptive strategy has worked… HD Radio is a trade name. It doesn’t have to stand for anything but a product. That product is by no means High Definition Radio.”

    http://tinyurl.com/63vxec

    “HD Radio is already lost (and really isn’t ‘HD’)”

    “Quite honestly, it doesn’t stand for anything, said Peter Ferrera, president and CEO of the HD Digital Radio Alliance. The concept was somewhat of a steal from HD television, where viewers know it means better quality.”

    http://tinyurl.com/2r5bz9

    Everything about HD Radio is a farce:

    http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com

  2. paul vincent zecchino says:

    Everything about HD is a lie. Promoters deny that HD jams when in fact it does so at BigRadio’s express insistence. Why? To jam competing broadcasters to ruin, make listeners discard billions of analog radios and buy costly HD stooge radios, and eliminate the possibility of any future broadcast licenses. The latter they rationalize on grounds that HD eats bandwidth, all the while denying jamming.

    Listeners long ago rejected this ‘carny shill’, as the East Bay Express News deemed this ‘high stakes big corporate scam’.

    There’s nothing wrong with AM&FM audio. The problem is lack of compelling content, due to the fact that BigRadio spent the past decade firing loyal talent and limiting listener choices.

    HD’s promoters reply to routine questions with vague, shifting stories, heated denials, and outright insults. Nothing about HD is on the level, from wildly exagerated tales of ‘200 million dollar HD promotions’ to ‘hundreds of thousands of HD sets sold’, it’s a wilderness of self-serving mirrors.

    If you like the idea of all your radios becoming worthless, of having to buy expensive HD sets which pull in a few local HD stations, and closed-system proprietary software driven radio in need of constant updates and receiver upgrades – from you wallet – by all means, embrace HD.

    If you love radio, don’t.

    Paul Vincent Zecchino
    Manasota Key, Florida
    28 July, 2008

  3. Quikboy says:

    Good post! That’s one thing I’m NOT investing in!

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for EveryJoe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.