<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Value Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/why-i-value-design-217/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/why-i-value-design-217/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:52:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flaschner</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/why-i-value-design-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333584</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flaschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=77#comment-333584</guid>
		<description>Paul,

I&#039;ve been saying the same thing about design and blogs for some time now - both on my own site and elsewhere. 

I&#039;m coming at this from a designer&#039;s perspective, and it amazes me that SO many of the top blogs are as horribly designed as they are. I started to write a 4 part design review of the design of the top ten blogs (according to technorati). I made it through 3 entries, but I stopped before finishing. The reason? It was depressing.

One can get away with bad design now, but only if you already have a huge amount of traffic. There is no way badly designed sites will be able to earn their keep if this growth curve keeps up. It&#039;s just like the early days of the web...

Peter

ps, personally, I liked the fixed position layout better - it was a nice change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying the same thing about design and blogs for some time now &#8211; both on my own site and elsewhere. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m coming at this from a designer&#8217;s perspective, and it amazes me that SO many of the top blogs are as horribly designed as they are. I started to write a 4 part design review of the design of the top ten blogs (according to technorati). I made it through 3 entries, but I stopped before finishing. The reason? It was depressing.</p>
<p>One can get away with bad design now, but only if you already have a huge amount of traffic. There is no way badly designed sites will be able to earn their keep if this growth curve keeps up. It&#8217;s just like the early days of the web&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter</p>
<p>ps, personally, I liked the fixed position layout better &#8211; it was a nice change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/why-i-value-design-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333585</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=77#comment-333585</guid>
		<description>A majority of the top blogs in Technorati were there from the beginning to they had first-mover advantage in the sense that there not that many quality blogs to begin with. I agree now though having a horrid design can be a major setback on your road to popularity.

As for the current design, it&#039;s a placeholder as I have got a designer working on something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A majority of the top blogs in Technorati were there from the beginning to they had first-mover advantage in the sense that there not that many quality blogs to begin with. I agree now though having a horrid design can be a major setback on your road to popularity.</p>
<p>As for the current design, it&#8217;s a placeholder as I have got a designer working on something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Latham</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/why-i-value-design-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Latham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=77#comment-333586</guid>
		<description>Paul, I agree with you a lot on this...I just did something that is totally out of the norm for me...I made a design for 2 sites.

I took this post into consideration when making the template, and I took a lot of what you are doing with the network into consideration. Visitors can find my entries about these topics on my blogs; not going to plug them here. But yeah, click my link :x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I agree with you a lot on this&#8230;I just did something that is totally out of the norm for me&#8230;I made a design for 2 sites.</p>
<p>I took this post into consideration when making the template, and I took a lot of what you are doing with the network into consideration. Visitors can find my entries about these topics on my blogs; not going to plug them here. But yeah, click my link :x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Lyttle</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/why-i-value-design-217/comment-page-1/#comment-333587</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lyttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workboxers.com/?p=77#comment-333587</guid>
		<description>4. A visitor comes from slashdot and finds the article interesting. So they add forevergeek to their live bookmarks in firefox.

That&#039;s how it happened for me. I really don&#039;t like the design of ForeverGeek, too bland for my liking. It needs some character.

But at the same time, the Slashdot site doesn&#039;t win any points for design. It&#039;s all about the content.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. A visitor comes from slashdot and finds the article interesting. So they add forevergeek to their live bookmarks in firefox.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how it happened for me. I really don&#8217;t like the design of ForeverGeek, too bland for my liking. It needs some character.</p>
<p>But at the same time, the Slashdot site doesn&#8217;t win any points for design. It&#8217;s all about the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>