<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia’s SEO Lessons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/wikipedia%e2%80%99s-seo-lessons-46/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/wikipedia%e2%80%99s-seo-lessons-46/</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:35:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Automotive SEO Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/wikipedia%e2%80%99s-seo-lessons-46/comment-page-1/#comment-8085</link>
		<dc:creator>Automotive SEO Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/03/14/wikipedia%e2%80%99s-seo-lessons/#comment-8085</guid>
		<description>This was a good find and I think it addresses a larger point as well.   

If you can create a website that offers up valuable content, people see it as a solid resource and link to it.   Then optimizing in such a way as Wikipedia you can take full advantage of the popularity.  

My thought is that many SEO&#039;s go about creating content in reverse.  Creating the content with SEO&#039;s in mind from the start.  Instead, look at Wikipedia,  they create great content within a frame or structure that allows and encourages SE readability naturally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a good find and I think it addresses a larger point as well.   </p>
<p>If you can create a website that offers up valuable content, people see it as a solid resource and link to it.   Then optimizing in such a way as Wikipedia you can take full advantage of the popularity.  </p>
<p>My thought is that many SEO&#8217;s go about creating content in reverse.  Creating the content with SEO&#8217;s in mind from the start.  Instead, look at Wikipedia,  they create great content within a frame or structure that allows and encourages SE readability naturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/wikipedia%e2%80%99s-seo-lessons-46/comment-page-1/#comment-8081</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/03/14/wikipedia%e2%80%99s-seo-lessons/#comment-8081</guid>
		<description>Hi Noel,

The on-page SEO may be great at Wikipedia, and the content attracts the engines, of course, but I believe it&#039;s at least as much to do with the inbound links.

Website editors, bloggers and commenters who mention something to do with a topic they feel may need defining will add a link to Wikipedia almost without thinking.  Writers thinking their opinions need support will quote Wikipedia if they can find an article that agrees with them.  And even a quote from Wikipedia gets a link back to the source page.  These are all deep links.

Often these references will be a context where &#039;nofollows&#039; are not used, and the link love gets piled 10 feet high for the topic concerned.


Vic
http://www.mind-mapping.org 
The master list of mind mapping &amp; 
information management software</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Noel,</p>
<p>The on-page SEO may be great at Wikipedia, and the content attracts the engines, of course, but I believe it&#8217;s at least as much to do with the inbound links.</p>
<p>Website editors, bloggers and commenters who mention something to do with a topic they feel may need defining will add a link to Wikipedia almost without thinking.  Writers thinking their opinions need support will quote Wikipedia if they can find an article that agrees with them.  And even a quote from Wikipedia gets a link back to the source page.  These are all deep links.</p>
<p>Often these references will be a context where &#8216;nofollows&#8217; are not used, and the link love gets piled 10 feet high for the topic concerned.</p>
<p>Vic<br />
<a href="http://www.mind-mapping.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.mind-mapping.org</a><br />
The master list of mind mapping &amp;<br />
information management software</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
