<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cellphone9 &#187; lock in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/cellphone9/tag/lock-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/cellphone9</link>
	<description>Mobile Phones - Wireless Life - Cellular Phones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SOON? iPhone 3G owners can now cancel subscription without having to pay AT&amp;T lock in fees? Doubt.</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/cellphone9/soon-iphone-3g-owners-can-now-cancel-subscription-without-having-to-pay-att-lock-in-fees-doubt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/cellphone9/soon-iphone-3g-owners-can-now-cancel-subscription-without-having-to-pay-att-lock-in-fees-doubt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jayvee Fernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lock in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cellphone9.com/soon-iphone-3g-owners-can-now-cancel-subscription-without-having-to-pay-att-lock-in-fees-doubt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early termination fees, the only wall that bars consumers from becoming scott free from a lock in period to a particular telco is now illegal in California:

In one fell swoop, Judge Bonnie Sabraw of the Alameda County Superior Court has added $72.9 million to Sprint-Nextel’s loss column, and declared early termination fees illegal. Ruling against the service provider in a class-action lawsuit, the judge ordered the company to pay $18.2 million to the plaintiffs, and say goodbye to over $54.7 million, the total amount charged to reportedly over 2 million Californians when they terminated their post-paid plans early.
So does this [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/cellphone9">Cellphone9</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early termination fees, the only wall that bars consumers from becoming scott free from a lock in period to a particular telco is <a href="http://www.thegadgetblog.com/2008/08/01/californian-judge-rules-early-termination-fees-illegal/">now illegal in California</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
In one fell swoop, Judge Bonnie Sabraw of the Alameda County Superior Court has added $72.9 million to Sprint-Nextel’s loss column, and <strong>declared early termination fees illegal</strong>. Ruling against the service provider in a class-action lawsuit, the judge ordered the company to pay $18.2 million to the plaintiffs, and say goodbye to over $54.7 million, the total amount charged to reportedly over 2 million Californians when they terminated their post-paid plans early.</p></blockquote>
<p>So does this apply to the iPhone 3G and AT&#038;T lock in plans? Actually no. First off the FCC obviously sees through this as a scapegoat plan to get much desired hardware. They&#8217;re smarter than that. <strong>A whole bunch of AT&#038;T customers all of a sudden becoming dissatisfied with AT&#038;T&#8217; service all at once?</strong> Too suspicious, it&#8217;s actually cute.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/cellphone9">Cellphone9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/cellphone9/soon-iphone-3g-owners-can-now-cancel-subscription-without-having-to-pay-att-lock-in-fees-doubt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>