Skip to content

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

New Linux User

Reader Question: Why is there no /etc/modules.conf in Ubuntu?

July 10, 2006 by Jon  
Filed under Reader Questions

OK, I’ll admit it – I’m the reader in this case.

I was reading the booting section of my fancy-dancy LPI certification book and it speaks about kernel parameters. It mentions that you can feed the kernel parameters at boot time (which will be the subject of an upcoming entry) and also states that you can feed kernel modules parameters as well. It says that kernel module parameters can be specified in either the /etc/modules.conf or the /etc/conf.modules file.

I’m running Kubuntu 6.06LTS and I have neither of these files. I have an /etc/modprobe.d/ directory that contains a bunch of files that kind of look like what I want, but I’m not familiar enough with this topic to figure it out. I did some preliminary Googling and came up with this post that states running a sudo update-modules will create the modules.conf file, but it doesn’t work.

Now, it’s quite obvious that I don’t need this file as my system runs fine, but in order to understand how to pass module parameters, I need to understand how the system works in Ubuntu. Anyone want to take a shot at explaining it for me?

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

5 Responses to “Reader Question: Why is there no /etc/modules.conf in Ubuntu?”
  1. Neil says:

    I’m not really sure, but I’ve been starting to notice that folders ending with .d seem to be a place to put a load of individual files that together constitute a whole configuration file. Like init.d and (in Fedora) yum.repos.d. Kind of like they make your conf files modular.

    So maybe you don’t need a modules.conf because Ubuntu splits all the files out into modules.d, to make it a bit easier to manage?

  2. Jon says:

    Methinks you’re right. I have an /etc/modules.conf on my Debian server and it has sections (like alias, for example) that look like individual files in my /etc/modules.d director on my Kubuntu box.

  3. derry says:

    in 2.6 OS

    the /etc/modules.conf was replaced by /etc/modprobe.conf

    and since this is not in Ubuntu been replace by

    /etc/modprobe.d (which contains the modules in scripts anyways)

  4. peter says:

    I find that the modules.conf has been replaced by /etc/modeprobe.conf in the Fedora Core!

  5. guojun says:

    You could have a look at the folling two files:
    /etc/module-init-tools
    /etc/module
    you may find something

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for EveryJoe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.