<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; aaron rogers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/aaron-rogers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>For Argument&#8217;s Sake</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/for-arguments-sake-4-671/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/for-arguments-sake-4-671/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lyndsey D'Arcangelo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaron rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Argument's Sake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.girlsdigsports.com/for-arguments-sake-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Brett Favre being selfish?
It&#8217;s hard not to talk about this situation because it&#8217;s so prevalent in the sports media outlets. It&#8217;s everywhere. It&#8217;s even on this blog.
So for this week&#8217;s thought provoking question, I thought I&#8217;d go right to the heart of the matter. Most people are talking what the Packers administration should or shouldn&#8217;t do, and what they have or have not done. But what about Favre? He&#8217;s not completely innocent in this situation either. 
But is he being selfish?
My argument is this: No, I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s being selfish. I just think that he&#8217;s a dedicated football [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/for-arguments-sake-4-671/">For Argument&#8217;s Sake</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Brett Favre being selfish?</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard not to talk about this situation because it&#8217;s so prevalent in the sports media outlets. It&#8217;s <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3490792">everywhere</a>. It&#8217;s even on this <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/10-places-favre-might-end-up/">blog</a>.</p>
<p>So for this week&#8217;s thought provoking question, I thought I&#8217;d go right to the heart of the matter. Most people are talking what the <strong>Packers</strong> administration should or shouldn&#8217;t do, and what they have or have not done. But what about <strong>Favre</strong>? He&#8217;s not completely innocent in this situation either. </p>
<p>But is he being selfish?</p>
<p><strong>My argument is this:</strong> No, I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s being selfish. I just think that he&#8217;s a dedicated football player who truly loves the game, isn&#8217;t ready to <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/uh-oh/">let it go</a> just yet, and is stuck at a perplexing point in his life where he&#8217;s not in his prime but he&#8217;s not too old to play either. The bottom line is that <strong>Favre </strong>just doesn&#8217;t know what <strong>Favre</strong> wants. He wants to play but he&#8217;s not sure if he&#8217;s up to it. He&#8217;s ready to retire but he&#8217;s not ready to give up the game just yet. He&#8217;s confused and I can understand that. The past three years have been much of the same question for <strong>Favre </strong>— is he or isn&#8217;t he going to retire. But this year was different because the <strong>Packers </strong>didn&#8217;t want to wait for his answer. They wanted to know back in March and they had every right to ask because in previous years they had set everything aside to wait for <strong>Favre&#8217;s </strong>answer. This time they asked for an answer up front and <strong>Favre</strong> told them what he thought they wanted to hear. </p>
<p><strong>Favre&#8217;s</strong> retirement press conference was highly emotional. I remember watching it and aching for him. But I also remember him saying that he wasn&#8217;t planning on making a comeback — this was it, his last hoorah, so don&#8217;t expect him to make any attempts at playing again. But Favre was not fooling us, he was fooling himself. He&#8217;s just a guy who&#8217;s stuck in that in between world of too old to be young and too young to be old. We will all be there someday and we&#8217;ll all be forced to ask ourselves if we&#8217;re ready to hang it up or wonder if we&#8217;ve still got some fight left in us.</p>
<p>I feel sorry for <strong><a href="http://www.aaronrodgersqb.com/">Aaron Rodgers</a></strong> in this mess. He&#8217;s just a kid who got signed and is ready to play. He shouldn&#8217;t have to sit in the shadows while <strong>Favre</strong> figures out his midlife crisis. He deserves a chance to play. You can&#8217;t  hand him the key&#8217;s to the Range and say, &#8220;here you go kid, it&#8217;s all yours,&#8221; and then ask for it back. The <strong>Packers</strong> made their decision on their starting quarterback when<strong> Favre</strong> made his own decision on retiring. There&#8217;s nothing left to do but move on. If that means <strong>Favre </strong>should go to another team then so be it.<br />
<strong><br />
Favre</strong> isn&#8217;t being selfish because he&#8217;s not asking the Packers to put him back in the starting position. He isn&#8217;t expecting that. What he did ask for was a release, which I don&#8217;t think is asking too much. Now he&#8217;s asking for a trade. If the <strong>Packers</strong> don&#8217;t grant him a release, don&#8217;t trade him and force him back into retirement, well &#8230; that, to me, is being selfish.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>The results of the Chris Duhon poll are in!</strong> The question was: <em>Is Chris Duhon the answer to Starbury?</em><br />
The majority of you believe that he&#8217;s not because he isn&#8217;t a true point guard.</p></blockquote>
<p>For previous editions of <strong>For Argument&#8217;s Sake</strong>, go <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/category/for-arguments-sake/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/for-arguments-sake-4-671/">For Argument&#8217;s Sake</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/for-arguments-sake-4-671/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uh Oh &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/uh-oh-671/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/uh-oh-671/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lyndsey D'Arcangelo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaron rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.girlsdigsports.com/uh-oh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might have to eat some crow after all.
I said that we should all &#8220;let it go.&#8221; But how can we let it go when Brett Favre won&#8217;t. He&#8217;s got the itch to play, which I can understand. He said that he&#8217;s always tired in March, he&#8217;s always ready to take a break from football. But maybe a permanent break was too much. Maybe he just needed a few months out of the spotlight to regroup. Maybe he just needed to some time to realize why he played football in the first place &#8230; because it&#8217;s fun for him.
And now [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/uh-oh-671/">Uh Oh &#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might have to <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/let-it-go/">eat some crow </a>after all.</p>
<p>I said that we should all &#8220;let it go.&#8221; But how can we let it go when <strong>Brett Favre</strong> won&#8217;t. He&#8217;s got the itch to play, which I can understand. He said that he&#8217;s always tired in March, he&#8217;s always ready to take a break from football. But maybe a permanent break was too much. Maybe he just needed a few months out of the spotlight to regroup. Maybe he just needed to some time to realize why he played football in the first place &#8230; because it&#8217;s fun for him.</p>
<p>And now that he&#8217;s had the time to regroup, to rest, to remember why he loves to play, he&#8217;s thinking that maybe he&#8217;d like to come back. He&#8217;s thinking that maybe he made mistake.</p>
<p>The problem is, the <strong>Green Bay Packers</strong> have already moved on.</p>
<p><span id="more-55109"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Packers GM, coach say team won&#8217;t release Favre despite request</strong></p>
<p>GREEN BAY, Wis. &#8212; The Green Bay Packers aren&#8217;t about to let Brett Favre become a free agent. And while he&#8217;s free to return to Green Bay for another season, there&#8217;s no guarantee he&#8217;ll be the Packers&#8217; starting quarterback if he does.</p>
<p>In an interview with The Associated Press Saturday, Packers general manager Ted Thompson and coach Mike McCarthy said they don&#8217;t plan to grant Favre the release he is seeking from his contract and are committed to Aaron Rodgers as their starter.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve communicated that to Brett, that we have since moved forward,&#8221; Thompson told the AP on Saturday. &#8220;At the same time, we&#8217;ve never said that there couldn&#8217;t be some role that he might play here. But I would understand his point that he would want to play.&#8221; ~ <a href="http://www.espn.com">ESPN.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Favre as a backup? Never going to happen. Favre in another uniform? Unless the Packers release him, that isn&#8217;t going to happen either. A trade could be possible, if the Packers <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=wojciechowski_gene&#038;id=3485214&#038;sportCat=nfl">play their cards </a>right. But this isn&#8217;t a win, win situation. And in the end, either the Packers or Favre is going to end up as the loser. </p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/uh-oh-671/">Uh Oh &#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/uh-oh-671/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>