<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; acquisition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/acquisition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft Misses DoubleClick</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-misses-doubleclick-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-misses-doubleclick-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$3.1-billion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online-ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftweblog.com/2007/04/14/microsoft-misses-doubleclick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft missed the opportunity to purchase DoubleClick, which I had written about before. Lo and behold, look who bought them instead, good ol&#8217; Google! &#8220;Bought&#8221; might be using the word a little lightly too, more like Google came in, opened up the war chest coffers and slammed the money bags down on the board room table and said &#8220;We&#8217;ll take it!&#8221;. You know, like you&#8217;d do as a kid playing Monopoly when you finally landed on Boardwalk.
$3,100,000,000! That&#8217;s how much money Google put down on the table in their money bags. And we thought they paid heartily for YouTube. If I [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-misses-doubleclick-59/">Microsoft Misses DoubleClick</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft missed the opportunity to purchase DoubleClick, which I had <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/2007/03/29/microsoft-clicks-on-doubleclick-opportunity/" title="Microsoft Clicks on DoubleClick Opportunity">written about</a> before. Lo and behold, look who bought them instead, good ol&#8217; <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com" title="Google">Google</a>! &#8220;Bought&#8221; might be using the word a little lightly too, more like <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com" title="Google">Google</a> came in, opened up the war chest coffers and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/doubleclick.html" title="Google to Acquire DoubleClick">slammed the money bags down</a> on the board room table and said &#8220;We&#8217;ll take it!&#8221;. You know, like you&#8217;d do as a kid playing Monopoly when you finally landed on Boardwalk.</p>
<p>$3,100,000,000! That&#8217;s how much money Google put down on the table in their money bags. And we thought they paid heartily for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com" title="YouTube">YouTube</a>. If I had something I thought <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com" title="Google">Google</a> would be slightly interested in now, my heart would be all a flutter with the thought of them courting my company and purchasing it.</p>
<p>The question is, how much is this going to impact Microsoft? <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoft.com" title="Microsoft">Microsoft</a> was looking at DoubleClick and a reported offer of $2B purchase price. That purchase was supposed to help them compete with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com" title="Google">Google</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.yahoo.com" title="Yahoo!">Yahoo</a> in the online advertising space. Now, their competitor just bought up another huge chunk of the market that&#8217;s available and leaves <a target="_blank" href="http://www.yahoo.com" title="Yahoo!">Yahoo</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoft.com" title="Microsoft">Microsoft</a> in the dust again.</p>
<p>Here are a few quotes from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/doubleclick.html" title="Google Acquires DoubleClick">Google&#8217;s press release about the purchase</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It has been our vision to make Internet advertising better &#8211; less intrusive, more effective, and more useful. Together with DoubleClick, Google will make the Internet more efficient for end users, advertisers, and publishers,&#8221; said Sergey Brin, Google&#8217;s Co-Founder and President, Technology.</p>
<p>&#8220;DoubleClick&#8217;s technology is widely adopted by leading advertisers, publishers and agencies, and the combination of the two companies will accelerate the adoption of Google&#8217;s innovative advances in display advertising,&#8221; said Eric Schmidt, Chief Executive Officer of Google.</p>
<p>&#8220;This transaction will strengthen our advertising network by expanding our access to publisher inventory and enabling us to serve the needs of a broader set of advertisers and ad agencies,&#8221; said Tim Armstrong, Google&#8217;s President, Advertising and Commerce, North America.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not sure if I believe the &#8220;less intrusive&#8221; comment because I feel like no matter where I look I see Google AdSense or Google something.</p>
<p>But the other comments seem to be exactly the areas that Microsoft could have really benefitted from the acquisition of DoubleClick themselves. Who&#8217;s in charge of the check book over there at Microsoft HQ? Let&#8217;s pony up some money and make an impact on something again.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-misses-doubleclick-59/">Microsoft Misses DoubleClick</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/microsoft-misses-doubleclick-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
