Skip to content

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

Google’s Dominance Could Lead to Trouble

May 19, 2009 by Mark Ellis  
Filed under Business

Google’s Dominance Could Lead to Trouble

Speculators continue to suggest that Google may eventually become the subject of anti-trust regulation on the part of the Justice Department’s antitrust division. The Justice Department’s promise last week to enforce regulations on monopolizing corporations strengthened these claims.
Several media companies and advertising groups have expressed concern over the search engine giant’s expansion from Internet search to several related markets. However, Google supporters argue that Google’s undeniable dominance in the Internet search business is in no way illegal unless Google tries to use its strength to stifle competition.
According to Google, the company would lose its dominance in the search engine business …read more

Restraint of Trade – The Truncated Rule of Reason and More

June 4, 2008 by Mark  
Filed under Business

Restraint of Trade – The Truncated Rule of Reason and More

Referring again to this definition of Restraint of Trade, continuing to give consideration to current events;
We’ll take a look at the third court determined legal standard, the Truncated Rule of Reason. There really isn’t much there yet its importance is just as great;
“The truncated rule of reason test is used in cases where the per se test is not applicable but where nonetheless “no elaborate industry analysis is required to demonstrate the anticompetitive character” of the restraint (NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma).”
I don’t want to neglect additional considerations or anti-competitive trade practices violators might engage …read more

For What It’s Worth, The Topic Is Restraint of Trade

May 26, 2008 by Mark  
Filed under Business

For What It’s Worth, The Topic Is Restraint of Trade

I think this is worth passing along because it might be useful in a number of online situations currently being discussed…
Restraint of Trade
The people who wrote the Sherman Anti-Trust Act were purposefully vague because they apparently wanted to leave many decisions about this up to the courts and it worked. Since 1890, “the courts have come up with three different legal standards to be used in determining restraint of trade.” This is one;
Rule of reason

So, You’re Hogtied To One Payment System?

April 18, 2008 by Mark  
Filed under Business

So, You’re Hogtied To One Payment System?

And one of the first few thoughts are whether or not that is fair, legal, greedy or monopolistic?
Down under, they are concerned with eBay Australia’s requirement that sellers only offer PayPal as a payment processor for their auctions.
eBay Australia Sellers React to PayPal-Only Policy
“eBay Australia made a decision to remove direct deposit, money orders and checks as payment options”
Are eBay Australia’s New Payment Restrictions Fair Trade?


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for EveryJoe | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.