<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; AOL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/aol-netscape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AOL Joins the Game</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2008/02/17/aol-joins-the-game/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL now joins the game.  According to the Press Association, whose website is hosted in google,  AOL&#8217;s advisers met with representatives from Yahoo to see if a deal is workable.
There is no definite terms available yet as of now.
One thing for sure is that Yahoo has choices apart from the one given by Microsoft.  In fact even Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp also offered to buy  20%  of yahoo.
So far, based on comments and buzz over the internet,  some of Yahoo&#8217;s shareholders prefer the deal offered by Microsoft.
[via telegraph.co.uk ]
Post from: EveryJoe
AOL Joins the Game
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/">AOL Joins the Game</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/46/2008/02/aollogo.jpg" alt="aol logo" align="left" />AOL now joins the game.  According to the <a href="http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvY96kTrvYbN4Mko34YzxgG3-B5w">Press Association</a>, whose website is hosted in google,  AOL&#8217;s advisers met with representatives from Yahoo to see if a deal is workable.</p>
<p>There is no definite terms available yet as of now.</p>
<p>One thing for sure is that Yahoo has choices apart from the one given by Microsoft.  In fact even Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp also offered to buy  20%  of yahoo.</p>
<p>So far, based on comments and buzz over the internet,  some of Yahoo&#8217;s shareholders prefer the deal offered by Microsoft.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&amp;grid=&amp;xml=/money/2008/02/17/cnaol117.xml">telegraph.co.uk</a> ]</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/">AOL Joins the Game</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-joins-the-game-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engines Comment on their Own Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live.com / MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy-Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/08/13/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week CNET News.com sent 8 questions to each search engine in an attempt to rank them based on their own observation of themselves. This is in an attempt to help people understand the different policies used by each engine on specific issues. The engines included AOL, Ask.com, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo and the questions asked included:

What search-related data&#8211;including IP addresses, cookie IDs, user identities, and search terms&#8211;do you retain?
How long do you retain those data? 
If you retain data for a limited period of time, is it completely deleted (in such a way that the data and backups cannot [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/">Engines Comment on their Own Privacy</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Last week CNET News.com sent 8 questions to each search engine in an attempt to rank them based on their own <a href="http://news.com.com/In+their+own+words+Search+engines+on+privacy/2100-1029_3-6202047.html">observation of themselves</a>.</strong> This is in an attempt to help people understand the different policies used by each engine on specific issues. The engines included AOL, Ask.com, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo and the questions asked included:</p>
<blockquote><ul>
<li>What search-related data&#8211;including IP addresses, cookie IDs, user identities, and search terms&#8211;do you retain?</li>
<li>How long do you retain those data? </li>
<li>If you retain data for a limited period of time, is it completely deleted (in such a way that the data and backups cannot be recovered, even under court order) or is it anonymized instead?</li>
<li>If the data are anonymized, exactly how do you do this?</li>
<li>Do you do behavioral targeting, meaning showing ads to users based on their behavior across multiple queries?</li>
<li>If you do, is there a way for users to opt out of behavioral targeting?</li>
<li>Do you use knowledge about your users (such as ZIP code, e-mail address, gender, or birth date) obtained through user registration to deliver targeted ads on your search engine?</li>
<li>Do you use knowledge about the identities of your users&#8217; instant messaging or e-mail correspondents when using those services, or the contents of those communications, to deliver targeted ads on your search engine?</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Interesting stuff&#8230;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/">Engines Comment on their Own Privacy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/engines-comment-on-their-own-privacy-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adwords to Private Label AOL Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-adwords-to-private-label-aol-ads-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-adwords-to-private-label-aol-ads-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 01:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2007/04/07/google-adwords-to-private-label-aol-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in December of 2005 Google formed a strategic partnership with AOL for providing Google&#8217;s search &#038; sponsored results on the AOL platform. This partnership is being strengthened this week with the introduction of an Adwords &#8220;private labeled&#8221; ad platform for AOL customers. 
Time Warner Inc.&#8217;s (TWX.N: Quote, Profile , Research) AOL division will introduce a paid search service on Monday backed by Google Inc.&#8217;s (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile , Research) technology to help advertisers better target AOL users.
The service will help AOL capture advertising dollars from ads linked to search terms in text, in addition to the money it makes [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-adwords-to-private-label-aol-ads-46/">Google Adwords to Private Label AOL Ads</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Back in December of 2005 Google formed a strategic partnership with AOL for providing Google&#8217;s search &#038; sponsored results on the AOL platform.</strong> This partnership is being strengthened this week with the introduction of an Adwords <a href="http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20070406:MTFH25262_2007-04-06_20-34-15_N05234740&#038;type=comktNews&#038;rpc=44">&#8220;private labeled&#8221; ad platform</a> for AOL customers. </p>
<blockquote><p>Time Warner Inc.&#8217;s (TWX.N: Quote, Profile , Research) AOL division will introduce a paid search service on Monday backed by Google Inc.&#8217;s (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile , Research) technology to help advertisers better target AOL users.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The service will help AOL capture advertising dollars from ads linked to search terms in text, in addition to the money it makes from display ads, such as banners. AOL&#8217;s search service drew 311 million queries in February, according to tracking firm comScore Media Metrix.</p></blockquote>
<p>Personally I think that this is a wise move on both sides and I wonder if this is a trend that we&#8217;re about to see with Google providing their ad-platform to companies who would like direct control over their advertisers and inventory and so far stayed away from using Google&#8217;s ads.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-adwords-to-private-label-aol-ads-46/">Google Adwords to Private Label AOL Ads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-adwords-to-private-label-aol-ads-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL Needs to be SEOed</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-needs-to-be-seoed-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-needs-to-be-seoed-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2006/11/06/aol-needs-to-be-seoed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to look beyond search AOL started to understand that search traffic may be the way to go and admits that as far as SEO and the parts of their site visible to the different search engines, only 15% is crawled and the rest, about 85% is still invisible, because it used to be in a closed network accessible to only paid subscribers.
More on AOL&#8217;s SEO problems in this Washington Post article.
[via Threadwatch]
Post from: EveryJoe
AOL Needs to be SEOed
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-needs-to-be-seoed-46/">AOL Needs to be SEOed</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In an attempt to look beyond search AOL started to understand that search traffic may be the way to go</strong> and admits that as far as SEO and the parts of their site visible to the different search engines, only 15% is crawled and the rest, about 85% is still invisible, because it used to be in a closed network accessible to only paid subscribers.</p>
<p>More on AOL&#8217;s SEO problems in this <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/03/AR2006110301576.html">Washington Post article</a>.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/9860"><em>Threadwatch</em></a>]</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-needs-to-be-seoed-46/">AOL Needs to be SEOed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-needs-to-be-seoed-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL Releases Search Dataset</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-releases-search-dataset-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-releases-search-dataset-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineherald.com/2006/08/09/aol-releases-search-dataset/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL Research had released this week a dataset collected of 500,000 users over the course of 3 months. Shortly after they pulled it back fearing privacy issues that may come up. This move, however, was too late as mirrors were already posted, and now even tools are being built, such as this one which is not just another keyword research tool but also tells you the name of the site and the keywords used to reach it&#8230; Very useful.
Post from: EveryJoe
AOL Releases Search Dataset
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-releases-search-dataset-46/">AOL Releases Search Dataset</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL Research had released this week a dataset collected of 500,000 users over the course of 3 months. Shortly after they pulled it back fearing privacy issues that may come up. This move, however, was too late as <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gregsadetsky.com/aol-data/">mirrors</a> were already posted, and now even tools are being built, such as <a target="_blank" href="http://www.askthebrain.com/aol/">this one</a> which is not just another keyword research tool but also tells you the name of the site and the keywords used to reach it&#8230; Very useful.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-releases-search-dataset-46/">AOL Releases Search Dataset</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-releases-search-dataset-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More &#8220;Top 2005 Searches&#8221;, Lycos &amp; AOL</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-top-2005-searches-lycos-aol-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-top-2005-searches-lycos-aol-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineherald.com/2005/12/15/more-top-2005-searches-lycos-aol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today I posted about Yahoo&#8217;s Top Searches for 2005. I just found the AOL Search Year in Review for 2005 (compared to 2004) , as well as Lycos&#8217;s Top 100 search terms of 2005.
[Found via Search Engine Watch]
Post from: EveryJoe
More &#8220;Top 2005 Searches&#8221;, Lycos &#038; AOL
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-top-2005-searches-lycos-aol-46/">More &#8220;Top 2005 Searches&#8221;, Lycos &#038; AOL</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today I posted about <a href="http://searchengineherald.com/2005/12/15/yahoo-top-searches-for-2005/">Yahoo&#8217;s Top Searches for 2005</a>. I just found the <a href="http://hot.aol.com/2005/index.html">AOL Search Year in Review</a> for 2005 (compared to <a href="http://hot.aol.com/2004/index.html">2004</a>) , as well as Lycos&#8217;s <a href="http://50.lycos.com/120705.asp">Top 100 search terms of 2005</a>.</p>
<div align="right">[Found via <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/051212-160710"><em>Search Engine Watch</em></a>]</div>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-top-2005-searches-lycos-aol-46/">More &#8220;Top 2005 Searches&#8221;, Lycos &#038; AOL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-top-2005-searches-lycos-aol-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Now Wants a Piece of AOL &amp; Registers Some Strange Domain Name</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-now-wants-a-piece-of-aol-registers-some-strange-domains-2-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-now-wants-a-piece-of-aol-registers-some-strange-domains-2-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineherald.com/2005/10/13/google-now-wants-a-piece-of-aol-registers-some-strange-domains-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Financial Times reports today that Google had teamed up with Comcast to &#8220;take a joint minority stake in Time Warner’s AOL internet portal unit.&#8221;
While they were on it, they aparently wanted to make sure that no one can own the domain GoogleMotherFucker.com and registered it to their name. This domains joins a long list of domains already owned by GOOG.
[Source: Threadwatch]
Post from: EveryJoe
Google Now Wants a Piece of AOL &#038; Registers Some Strange Domain Name
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-now-wants-a-piece-of-aol-registers-some-strange-domains-2-46/">Google Now Wants a Piece of AOL &#038; Registers Some Strange Domain Name</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Financial Times <a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/5ac7e07e-3b58-11da-b7bc-00000e2511c8.html">reports</a> today that Google had teamed up with Comcast to &#8220;take a joint minority stake in Time Warner’s AOL internet portal unit.&#8221;</p>
<p>While they were on it, they aparently wanted to make sure that no one can own the domain <a href="http://whois.sc/GoogleMotherFucker.com">GoogleMotherFucker.com</a> and registered it to their name. This domains joins a <a href="http://searchengineherald.com/2005/09/30/google-domains/">long list</a> of domains already owned by GOOG.</p>
<div align="right">[Source: <a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/"><em>Threadwatch</em></a>]</div>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-now-wants-a-piece-of-aol-registers-some-strange-domains-2-46/">Google Now Wants a Piece of AOL &#038; Registers Some Strange Domain Name</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-now-wants-a-piece-of-aol-registers-some-strange-domains-2-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL.com Portal Leaves Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aolcom-portal-leaves-beta-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aolcom-portal-leaves-beta-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineherald.com/2005/09/23/aolcom-portal-leaves-beta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 3 months of beta, AOL&#8217;s new portal is officially released.
The new portal is pretty nice, very clean look. It features tabbed searching as well as links to many of AOL&#8217;s different services. 
Nicely done.
[Source...]
Post from: EveryJoe
AOL.com Portal Leaves Beta
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aolcom-portal-leaves-beta-46/">AOL.com Portal Leaves Beta</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 3 months of beta, <a href="http://www.aol.com/">AOL&#8217;s new portal</a> is <a href="http://beta.aol.com/projects/aolportal/index.html?">officially released</a>.</p>
<p>The new portal is pretty nice, very clean look. It features tabbed searching as well as links to many of AOL&#8217;s different services. </p>
<p>Nicely done.</p>
<div align="right">[<a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050923-095430"><i>Source</i>...</a>]</div>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aolcom-portal-leaves-beta-46/">AOL.com Portal Leaves Beta</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aolcom-portal-leaves-beta-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL is off the Market</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-is-off-the-market-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-is-off-the-market-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineherald.com/2005/09/23/aol-is-off-the-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past week there have been several rumors claiming that AOL&#8217;s time is up and that it  is up for sale. MSN and Google were also mentioned as potential buyers.
These rumors have come to an end today when
Josh Berger, the managing director of Warner Bros Entertainment UK, has warned against his company selling off its internet interest.
He said that the internet portal could provide a platform over which Warner Bros content, which includes the Harry Potter films and television series such as The West Wing, could be distributed. : &#8220;AOL would be helpful to that process,&#8221; he said.
He [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-is-off-the-market-46/">AOL is off the Market</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past week there have been several rumors claiming that <a href="http://www.nypost.com/business/28069.htm">AOL&#8217;s time is up</a> and that it  is up for sale. MSN and Google were also mentioned as potential buyers.</p>
<p>These rumors have <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9075-1787904,00.html">come to an end</a> today when</p>
<blockquote><p>Josh Berger, the managing director of Warner Bros Entertainment UK, has warned against his company selling off its internet interest.</p>
<p>He said that the internet portal could provide a platform over which Warner Bros content, which includes the Harry Potter films and television series such as The West Wing, could be distributed. : &#8220;AOL would be helpful to that process,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>He then added: &#8220;So we’re going to keep AOL.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-is-off-the-market-46/">AOL is off the Market</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-is-off-the-market-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL launches web based RSS reader</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/221-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/221-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineherald.com/2005/07/28/221/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/221-46/">AOL launches web based RSS reader</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.blogherald.com/wp-content/aolrss.jpg' alt=''aolrss" align="right" /><br />
AOL has launched a new web based RSS reader under the banner of <a href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/index.jsp">My AOL beta.</a> </p>
<p>The new service is clean and quick, and although it lacks general topic search capabilities (for release later) it works well. Suprisingly perhaps, is that its works, at the moment, without the need to register, so for casual use it works really well (I&#8217;m presuming it works off cookies). </p>
<p>(via <a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2005/07/28/aol-launches-web-based-rss-reader/">The Blog Herald</a>)</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/221-46/">AOL launches web based RSS reader</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/221-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>