<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; barr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/barr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Barr Campaign Steps Up Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/barr-campaign-steps-up-advertising-413/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/barr-campaign-steps-up-advertising-413/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thursday</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onevotematters.com/barr-campaign-steps-up-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right now, Bob Barr&#8217;s campaign is running radio ads in eight states. The campaign is actually planning start running a few television ads. Because of the difficulties of fundraising, it&#8217;s rare that third party candidates attempt to run television ads at all.
But the Barr campaign expects to run nearly 14 million households with their television ads. They&#8217;ve posted their first TV spot on YouTube:

I think it&#8217;s obvious that Barr&#8217;s campaign has less cash to work with than John McCain&#8217;s or Barack Obama&#8217;s in the production quality of the video — but, at the same time, it&#8217;s a well put together [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/barr-campaign-steps-up-advertising-413/">Barr Campaign Steps Up Advertising</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now, Bob Barr&#8217;s campaign is running radio ads in eight states. The campaign is actually planning start running a few television ads. Because of the difficulties of fundraising, it&#8217;s rare that third party candidates attempt to run television ads at all.</p>
<p>But the Barr campaign expects to run nearly 14 million households with their television ads. They&#8217;ve posted their first TV spot on YouTube:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MA4LJhghi5s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MA4LJhghi5s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s obvious that Barr&#8217;s campaign has less cash to work with than John McCain&#8217;s or Barack Obama&#8217;s in the production quality of the video — but, at the same time, it&#8217;s a well put together piece that does manage to introduce Barr&#8217;s platform clearly.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/barr-campaign-steps-up-advertising-413/">Barr Campaign Steps Up Advertising</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/barr-campaign-steps-up-advertising-413/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul&#8217;s Endorsement Goes To&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ron-pauls-endorsement-goes-to-413/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ron-pauls-endorsement-goes-to-413/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thursday</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckinney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onevotematters.com/ron-pauls-endorsement-goes-to/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Paul told supporters at the National Press Club in Washington this morning that he will not be supporting either Sen. John McCain or Sen. Barack Obama. 
Instead, Paul is endorsing the four leading independent candidates:

Cynthia McKinney (Green Party)
Bob Barr (Libertarian Party)
Ralph Nader (independent)
Chuck Baldwin (Constitution Party)

Paul said that he is supporting third-party candidates because the two major parties — and the media — have avoided discussing real political issues. The announcement comes after a call that Paul said he had received from the McCain campaign yesterday, asking for his endorsement. 
According to Paul, there&#8217;s really no difference between McCain [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ron-pauls-endorsement-goes-to-413/">Ron Paul&#8217;s Endorsement Goes To&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul told supporters at the National Press Club in Washington this morning that he will not be supporting either Sen. John McCain or Sen. Barack Obama. </p>
<p>Instead, Paul is endorsing the four leading independent candidates:
<ul>
<li>Cynthia McKinney (Green Party)</li>
<li>Bob Barr (Libertarian Party)</li>
<li>Ralph Nader (independent)</li>
<li>Chuck Baldwin (Constitution Party)</li>
</ul>
<p>Paul said that he is supporting third-party candidates because the two major parties — and the media — have avoided discussing real political issues. The announcement comes after a call that Paul said he had received from the McCain campaign yesterday, asking for his endorsement. </p>
<p>According to Paul, there&#8217;s really no difference between McCain and Obama and the American people shouldn&#8217;t have to choose the lesser of two evils. &#8220;We just don&#8217;t need to do that anymore.&#8221;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ron-pauls-endorsement-goes-to-413/">Ron Paul&#8217;s Endorsement Goes To&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ron-pauls-endorsement-goes-to-413/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Bob Barr be included in the debates?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/should-bob-barr-be-included-in-the-debates-413/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/should-bob-barr-be-included-in-the-debates-413/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thursday</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onevotematters.com/should-bob-barr-be-included-in-the-debates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been running a poll in the side bar, asking you whether Bob Barr, the Libertarian candidate for president, should be included in the debates and other events that both Barack Obama and John McCain participate in?
The majority seem to agree that Bob Barr should be included (6 votes), but almost as many (4 votes) think he doesn&#8217;t need to be included.
It&#8217;s an especially interesting question now that the news has come out that neither the Democratic nor Republican parties managed dotted every i and crossed every t necessary to have their candidates on the ballot in Texas. It looks [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/should-bob-barr-be-included-in-the-debates-413/">Should Bob Barr be included in the debates?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been running a poll in the side bar, asking you whether Bob Barr, the Libertarian candidate for president, should be included in the debates and other events that both Barack Obama and John McCain participate in?</p>
<p>The majority seem to agree that Bob Barr should be included (6 votes), but almost as many (4 votes) think he doesn&#8217;t need to be included.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an especially interesting question now that the <a href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/27/democrats-republicans-miss-texas-deadline-to-certify-presidential-nominees/">news</a> has come out that neither the Democratic nor Republican parties managed dotted every i and crossed every t necessary to have their candidates on the ballot in Texas. It looks like the Democratic and Republican candidates will still be on the ballot, but the Libertarian Party is <a href="http://campaign.blog.bobbarr2008.com/2008/08/29/bob-barr-the-lone-star-candidate/">not too happy to be held to higher standards</a> than the two major parties. Can&#8217;t really blame them, either.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/should-bob-barr-be-included-in-the-debates-413/">Should Bob Barr be included in the debates?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/should-bob-barr-be-included-in-the-debates-413/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>