<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; beckham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/beckham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No Bradman in the Forbes List</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/no-bradman-in-the-forbes-list-82/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/no-bradman-in-the-forbes-list-82/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dinsa Sachan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beckham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don bradman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixandout.net/no-bradman-in-the-forbes-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eat Cricket, drink Cricket, sleep Cricket
No, we aren&#8217;t talking about the Billionaire List.
It&#8217;s the list of greatest athletic achievements in the last 150 years that has rubbed us the wrong way. Now,  isn&#8217;t this completely insulting ignorance of the greatest sportsman who ever lived on the face of earth? If Babe Ruth&#8217;s 66 home runs and Nadia Comaneci&#8217;s perfect 10 qualify, why didn&#8217;t Don Bradman&#8217;s batting average of 99  persuade them? Should we launch a petition against this injustice to our hero? It&#8217;s worth it, believe me. It&#8217;s the Forbes magazine.
&#8211;
And those of you who are awed by [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/no-bradman-in-the-forbes-list-82/">No Bradman in the Forbes List</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>eat</em> Cricket, <em>drink</em> Cricket, <em>sleep</em> Cricket</strong></p>
<p>No, we aren&#8217;t talking about the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/03/05/richest-people-billionaires-billionaires08-cx_lk_0305billie_land.html" target="_blank">Billionaire List</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the list of <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2005/11/08/athletic-achievements-bannister_cx_05athleticachievland.html" target="_blank">greatest athletic achievements in the last 150 years</a> that has rubbed us the wrong way. Now,  isn&#8217;t this completely insulting ignorance of the greatest sportsman who ever lived on the face of earth? If Babe Ruth&#8217;s 66 home runs and Nadia Comaneci&#8217;s perfect 10 qualify, why didn&#8217;t Don Bradman&#8217;s batting average of 99  persuade them? Should we launch a petition against this injustice to our hero? It&#8217;s worth it, believe me. It&#8217;s the Forbes magazine.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>And those of you who are awed by the hefty sum Dhoni and others have pocketed at the  IPL, open your eyes. That&#8217;s peanuts compared to what <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/06/12/07celebrities_Athletes_slide.html?thisSpeed=10000" target="_blank">Beckham and Tiger Woods are earning. </a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/no-bradman-in-the-forbes-list-82/">No Bradman in the Forbes List</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/no-bradman-in-the-forbes-list-82/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>