<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; BING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:30:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Using Google Subscribed Links</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-google-subscribed-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-google-subscribed-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Subscribed Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-google-subscribed-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The battle for search is still going strong. All search companies are continually tweaking and adjusting their algorithms to help improve their search results and keep those same formulas for being gamed by developers.
&#160;
With Microsoft releasing Bing and Google working on their newest search algorithm called Google Caffeine, there&#8217;s a lot of effort around incorporating the idea of social search with your organic results.
One of my biggest complaints about search is that my results are impacted by just about everything that&#8217;s available on the web. If I&#8217;m searching for a question about a certain topic, I don&#8217;t want to get [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-google-subscribed-links/">Using Google Subscribed Links</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The battle for search is still going strong. All search companies are continually tweaking and adjusting their algorithms to help improve their search results and keep those same formulas for being gamed by developers.</p>
<p>&#160;<a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/11/googlesubscribedlinks.gif"><img style="border-bottom: 0px;border-left: 0px;border-top: 0px;border-right: 0px" border="0" alt="google-subscribed-links" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/11/googlesubscribedlinks_thumb.gif" width="590" height="248" /></a></p>
<p>With <a title="Microsoft website" href="http://www.microsoft.com" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> releasing <a title="Microsoft Bing Search" href="http://www.bing.com" target="_blank">Bing</a> and <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> working on their newest search algorithm called <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> Caffeine, there&#8217;s a lot of effort around incorporating the idea of social search with your organic results.</p>
<p>One of my biggest complaints about search is that my results are impacted by just about everything that&#8217;s available on the web. If I&#8217;m searching for a question about a certain topic, I don&#8217;t want to get results from sites that are completely irrelevant to the goal of my search.</p>
<p>For example, if I&#8217;m interested in a question about coffee, I don&#8217;t want to get results about people who have talked about sitting around the coffee shop and chatting all day. I may be more interested in the growth regions, bean roasting methods and brewing tasks.</p>
<p>There may be five or ten sites on the Internet that are really great at providing this content and I&#8217;d like to just search those sites for my answer. <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> provides the ability to do this kind of targeted search tuning by using <a title="Google Subscribed Links" href="http://www.google.com/coop/subscribedlinks/directory/All_categories" target="_blank">Google Subscribed Links</a>.</p>
<p><a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> has already put together some groupings of sites in categories like Tools, Fun and Games, Lifestyle, and Technology. When you search for certain keywords that have been programmed into these <a title="Google Subscribed Links" href="http://www.google.com/coop/subscribedlinks/directory/All_categories" target="_blank">Google Subscribed Links</a> you&#8217;ll get special results based on the search links that have been put together for you.</p>
<p>The problem is that <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> doesn&#8217;t make it easy for people to setup their own search metrics. Developers can create their own, but it&#8217;s not as user-friendly I would hope.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-google-subscribed-links/">Using Google Subscribed Links</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/using-google-subscribed-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zune HD specs, pricing, &amp; more leaked</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/zune-hd-specs-pricing-more-leaked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/zune-hd-specs-pricing-more-leaked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Parrish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zune HD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/?p=80462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Net has been buzzing in a big way this week with tons of details about the Zune HD, Microsoft&#8217;s next-gen, handheld multimedia device.

The FCC has filed its findings about the Zune HD on the FCC website, which provide a breakdown of the device&#8217;s specs and several pictures of its inner (and outer) workings. Engadget sums up the info learned:

Zune HD will be available in 16GB and 32GB flavors
The device&#8217;s user interface is built on Windows CE
An NVIDIA Tegra chip is used for graphics processing

The FCC&#8217;s pictures, which you can view on Engadget&#8217;s website, also include several shots of the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/zune-hd-specs-pricing-more-leaked/">Zune HD specs, pricing, &amp; more leaked</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Net has been buzzing in a big way this week with tons of details about the <strong>Zune HD</strong>, Microsoft&#8217;s next-gen, handheld multimedia device.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-79881" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/08/microsoft_zunehd.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="365" /></p>
<p>The FCC has filed its findings about the Zune HD on the <a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=569302&amp;fcc_id=%27C3K-1395%27" target="_blank">FCC website</a>, which provide a breakdown of the device&#8217;s specs and several pictures of its inner (and outer) workings. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/10/zune-hd-hits-fcc-in-prolific-photo-shoot-16gb-and-32gb-capaciti/" target="_blank">Engadget</a> sums up the info learned:</p>
<ul>
<li>Zune HD will be available in <strong>16GB</strong> and <strong>32GB</strong> flavors</li>
<li>The device&#8217;s user interface is built on Windows CE</li>
<li>An NVIDIA Tegra chip is used for graphics processing</li>
</ul>
<p>The FCC&#8217;s pictures, which you can view on Engadget&#8217;s website, also include several shots of the Zune HD&#8217;s dock (along with pics of the device itself with a bunch of Post-it arrow stickers all over it).</p>
<p>Next, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5334331/zune-hd-prices-leaked-16gb-for-220-32gb-for-290" target="_blank">Gizmodo</a> got its hands on exclusive images of Best Buy&#8217;s inventory system, which reveal the suggested retail prices as <strong>$220</strong> for the 16GB model, and <strong>$290</strong> for the 32GB. I hope these turn out to be accurate, because they&#8217;re very competitive. The Best Buy inventory also lists the surprisingly-soon <strong>September 8th</strong> as the Zune HD&#8217;s launch date. That I have a bit of a harder time swallowing, since multiple reports lately have described the device&#8217;s UI as &#8220;still a work in progress,&#8221; and a release date less than a month away gives MS precious little time to do any <em>real</em> marketing to hype its release. (Then again, maybe they already <em>are</em> hyping it with all these carefully-choreographed &#8220;leaks&#8221;&#8230;?)</p>
<p>Finally, CNet&#8217;s Donald Bell has posted some <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-12519_7-10306769-49.html" target="_blank">new screenshots</a> of the Zune HD&#8217;s mobile <strong>web browser</strong>. These represent the first time the browser has been seen. They reveal how the browser looks in both portrait and landscape mode, how the touchscreen typing handles (the verdict: &#8220;just as speedy and precise as the iPhone&#8221;), and one unannounced feature. To the surprise of absolutely no one, the Zune browser&#8217;s search capability is going to be powered by Microsoft&#8217;s <strong>Bing</strong> search engine.</p>
<p><em>Image: Microsoft.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/zune-hd-specs-pricing-more-leaked/">Zune HD specs, pricing, &amp; more leaked</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/zune-hd-specs-pricing-more-leaked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing and Google Combined</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-and-google-combined/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-and-google-combined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milo Riano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-and-google-combined/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always used Google and recently, the launch of Bing makes me move to the new search engine seeing at another set of search engine results. Sometimes, I cannot decide which one to use the given moment. Good thing a developer named Domagoj Pavlesic has decided to make things easier as he has launched bing-vs-google which allows you to search and compare the results side by side.
 
The interface is not well designed but if you are looking to compare results especially when you are checking search engine ranking of your keywords, the bing vs google is definitely functional.
Go [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-and-google-combined/">Bing and Google Combined</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always used <a href="http://www.techticles.com/tag/google" target="_blank">Google</a> and recently, the launch of Bing makes me move to the new search engine seeing at another set of search engine results. Sometimes, I cannot decide which one to use the given moment. Good thing a developer named Domagoj Pavlesic has decided to make things easier as he has launched <a href="http://bing-vs-google.com/" target="_blank">bing-vs-google</a> which allows you to search and compare the results side by side.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/image25.png"><img height="66" alt="image" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/image-thumb24.png" width="377" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>The interface is not well designed but if you are looking to compare results especially when you are checking search engine ranking of your keywords, the bing vs google is definitely functional.</p>
<p>Go ahead and give this a try until probably deciding which ones to stick on. I know most of you like Google, but c’mon Bing is worth a try.</p>
<p><em>Image from </em><a href="http://bing-vs-google.com/" target="_blank"><em>bing-vs-google</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-and-google-combined/">Bing and Google Combined</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-and-google-combined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing is Doing Good</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-is-doing-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-is-doing-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milo Riano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-is-doing-good/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written previously that Bing is Microsoft’s last stand and their ability to get bigger market share and become a real player in the search engine wars largely depend on the performance of Bing in the coming months and years. Initially, when Bing launched, traffic spiked which was normal but was no indication about a long term usage and growth.
 
For the month of June, Bing is looking great by becoming the 13th most visited site in the U.S. with 49.57 million. This puts Bing ahead of Digg, Twitter, and CNN. While their ultimate goal is far from happening, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-is-doing-good/">Bing is Doing Good</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written previously that <a href="http://www.techticles.com/bing-the-last-stand.page" target="_blank">Bing is Microsoft’s last stand</a> and their ability to get bigger market share and become a real player in the search engine wars largely depend on the performance of Bing in the coming months and years. Initially, when Bing launched, traffic spiked which was normal but was no indication about a long term usage and growth.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/image12.png"><img height="99" alt="image" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/image-thumb12.png" width="163" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>For the month of June, Bing is looking great by becoming the 13th most visited site in the U.S. with 49.57 million. This puts Bing ahead of Digg, Twitter, and CNN. While their ultimate goal is far from happening, their burst of traffic in the first month or so has been impressive. I believe their development team should work overtime and fast in hearing out all the positive remarks and do something on the negative items in their search engine. As long as they continue to read and address user comments, their growth traffic can grow over a long period of time.</p>
<p>Digg has received 38.96 million visitors, Twitter 23 million visitors, and CNN with 28.54 million visitors for June.</p>
<p>Have you used the Bing search engine lately?</p>
<p><em>Image from <a href="http://www.bing.com" target="_blank">Bing</a>.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-is-doing-good/">Bing is Doing Good</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bing-is-doing-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Really Search for Results</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-really-search-for-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-really-search-for-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-really-search-for-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jumping on your computer and quickly firing up your browser to search for something has become second nature to most of us. Opening your search engine of choice and throwing a couple of terms in the text box doesn&#8217;t take much thought. The question is are you fine-tuning your actions to get a manageable collection of results or are you pulling back a collection of haystacks looking for that one needle.

There&#8217;s a number of tips you can manage to add to your searching routine to help pull back that finer tuned section of results you&#8217;ve been looking for all this [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-really-search-for-results/">How to Really Search for Results</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumping on your computer and quickly firing up your browser to search for something has become second nature to most of us. Opening your search engine of choice and throwing a couple of terms in the text box doesn&#8217;t take much thought. The question is are you fine-tuning your actions to get a manageable collection of results or are you pulling back a collection of haystacks looking for that one needle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/magnifyingglassface.jpg"><img border="0" alt="magnifying-glass-face" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/07/magnifyingglassface-thumb.jpg" width="575" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a number of tips you can manage to add to your searching routine to help pull back that finer tuned section of results you&#8217;ve been looking for all this time. <a title="Eight Tips for Super Searching - PC Magazine" href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2346373,00.asp" target="_blank">PC Magazine has an article that lists a variety of tips on succeeding with your searches</a>.</p>
<p>Your first thought may be using a variety of <a title="operators in your searches" href="http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=136861" target="_blank">operators in your searches</a> to include, exclude or search for an exact phrase on the web. The PC Magazine article spotlights some other actions you can take to automate searches or remember some specific searches you make regularly as well.</p>
<h6>Image: sxc.hu</h6>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-really-search-for-results/">How to Really Search for Results</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/how-to-really-search-for-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Microsoft Doing with Hot-or-Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milo Riano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft previously filed for a patent on hot or not which allow users to rate a picture on it’s hotness level. The patent application states that the contributor would upload self images for viewing and would then be rated by viewers that provides an opinion on various fashion or cosmetic looks.
 
In an excerpt of the application description for the patent:
&#8220;The contributor uploads self images for viewing and rating (or voting) by viewers who choose provide an opinion on different fashion and/or cosmetic looks of the contributor. The contributor takes images show the contributor presented with a number (e.g., two) of [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/">What is Microsoft Doing with Hot-or-Not?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft previously filed for a patent on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5290035/its-the-new-microsoft-company-files-hot-or-not-software-patent" target="_blank">hot or not</a> which allow users to rate a picture on it’s hotness level. The patent application states that the contributor would upload self images for viewing and would then be rated by viewers that provides an opinion on various fashion or cosmetic looks.</p>
<p> <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-74815" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/hotornot.jpg" alt="hotornot" width="244" height="38" /></p>
<p>In an excerpt of the application description for the <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220090150203%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20090150203&amp;RS=DN/20090150203" target="_blank">patent</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;The contributor uploads self images for viewing and rating (or voting) by viewers who choose provide an opinion on different fashion and/or cosmetic looks of the contributor. The contributor takes images show the contributor presented with a number (e.g., two) of different fashion choices. The snapshots can then be processed for upload to a website or other accessible location by one or more viewers. The viewers can cast a vote for one of the images by selecting the desired image, in response to which the viewer and/or contributor will be presented with overall statistics for that set of images as to how other viewers voted, as well as a next set of photos depicting the user in a different fashion and/or cosmetic choice. This process can continue until terminated.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where is <a title="Microsoft" href="http://www.techticles.com/category/microsoft" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> going to use this patent? Maybe in their BING search engine that has all the eye candy they can put there.</p>
<p>Have you spotted places where they have used this already?</p>
<p><em>Image from the web.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/">What is Microsoft Doing with Hot-or-Not?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-is-microsoft-doing-with-hot-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
