<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; carbon footprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/carbon-footprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Green beer, not green beer</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/green-beer-not-green-beer-328/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/green-beer-not-green-beer-328/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewha-ha.com/green-beer-not-green-beer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new food industry blog Daily Blender gave me an idea with a post on the carbon footprint of bottled water. Having recently switched from delivered water to Philly&#8217;s finest tap water, I began to wonder what the most environmentally responsible way was to enjoy my beer.
Fortunately for me, others have already addressed the details. Apparently, reusable bottles which are refilled have the smallest carbon footprint, as is still common in Germany if not the rest of Europe. According to this post (mixing Green beer with green beer &#8211; in the St. Patrick&#8217;s sense of the word) returnable bottles are [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/green-beer-not-green-beer-328/">Green beer, not green beer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new food industry blog <a href="http://www.dailyblender.com/">Daily Blender</a> gave me an idea with a post on the <a href="http://www.dailyblender.com/2008/03/24/its-taptastic-part-1/">carbon footprint of bottled water</a>. Having recently switched from delivered water to Philly&#8217;s finest tap water, I began to wonder what the most environmentally responsible way was to enjoy my beer.</p>
<p>Fortunately for me, others have already addressed the details. Apparently, reusable bottles which are refilled have the smallest carbon footprint, as is still common in Germany if not the rest of Europe. According to this <a href="http://livingsmall.wordpress.com/2008/03/17/green-beer-no-really/">post</a> (mixing Green beer with green beer &#8211; in the St. Patrick&#8217;s sense of the word) returnable bottles are better if not shipped too far, whereas cans are better if the shipping is longer. Of course, that assumes that you&#8217;re recycling both. In theory, buying a keg (or brewing your own) could be even better, but I&#8217;ve never had the energy to do that.</p>
<p>Either way, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m going to do cans any time soon, but I&#8217;ll keep on recycling those bottle and patronizing my local breweries.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/green-beer-not-green-beer-328/">Green beer, not green beer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/green-beer-not-green-beer-328/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>