<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; contacts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/contacts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Outlook 2003 and Business Contact Manager and ACT!</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-2003-and-business-contact-manager-and-act-58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-2003-and-business-contact-manager-and-act-58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contacts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.office12watch.com/outlook-2003-and-business-contact-manager-and-act/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pardon this post, I know it&#8217;s not directly related to Office 2007, but I&#8217;m in need of some assistance.
I&#8217;m working with a client who&#8217;s trying to import records from ACT into BCM. Everything&#8217;s gone fine so far but trying to get the &#8220;Notes&#8221; field of the ACT! contacts into the appropriate corresponding field in BCM. Has anyone done this? Do you have a map of what needs to go where and how to validate the right notes go to the right contacts?
Let me know by e-mail or in the comments.
Thanks.
Post from: EveryJoe
Outlook 2003 and Business Contact Manager and ACT!
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-2003-and-business-contact-manager-and-act-58/">Outlook 2003 and Business Contact Manager and ACT!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon this post, I know it&#8217;s not directly related to Office 2007, but I&#8217;m in need of some assistance.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m working with a client who&#8217;s trying to import records from ACT into BCM. Everything&#8217;s gone fine so far but trying to get the &#8220;Notes&#8221; field of the ACT! contacts into the appropriate corresponding field in BCM. Has anyone done this? Do you have a map of what needs to go where and how to validate the right notes go to the right contacts?</p>
<p><a href="mailto:jason@b5media.com">Let me know</a> by e-mail or in the comments.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-2003-and-business-contact-manager-and-act-58/">Outlook 2003 and Business Contact Manager and ACT!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-2003-and-business-contact-manager-and-act-58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook Functionality</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-functionality-58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-functionality-58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[File Formats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.office12watch.com/outlook-functionality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just added some contacts to my Outlook Address book and I began thinking to myself, why in the world doesn&#8217;t Outlook let you link contacts to each other through some defined relationships? The main reason I think that is because the custom application we use at work to maintain tasks, contacts and case information does this to infinity and it&#8217;s very handy.
Here&#8217;s how it should work in Outlook
On the details page, if I can put in information such as an Anniversary date, why can&#8217;t I link that contact to their spouse in Outlook? If contacts are linked, I should [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-functionality-58/">Outlook Functionality</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just added some contacts to my Outlook Address book and I began thinking to myself, why in the world doesn&#8217;t Outlook let you link contacts to each other through some defined relationships? The main reason I think that is because the custom application we use at work to maintain tasks, contacts and case information does this to infinity and it&#8217;s very handy.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it should work in Outlook</p>
<p>On the details page, if I can put in information such as an Anniversary date, why can&#8217;t I link that contact to their spouse in Outlook? If contacts are linked, I should then also be able to share an address for those two people across contacts. This is a very normalized way of looking at things, but why should I have to enter the same address for someone that I&#8217;ve already entered once?</p>
<p>This would be more common with business contacts and a business address right? And that brings me to my second question.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t I add one contact and then say add another contact for the same company without repeating basic company information like name, address, phone #&#8217;s, website, etc.?</p>
<p>This just seems too simple to do for Microsoft to not have done it already, what&#8217;s the deal? Why isn&#8217;t Outlook seemingly based much more on Access database principles than it already is?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-functionality-58/">Outlook Functionality</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/outlook-functionality-58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>