<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; database</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/database/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Open Table Option Missing in SQL 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/open-table-option-missing-in-sql-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/open-table-option-missing-in-sql-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open table]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/open-table-option-missing-in-sql-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m getting my first experience working with the newest version of Microsoft&#8217;s SQL Server. We recently installed SQL Server 2008 at a client and we are setting up a web application on their servers now.

In&#160; my experience with SQL when I needed to edit data in a table I would right-click on the table name and select &#34;Open Table&#34; to display all the data in that table. I realize this probably isn&#8217;t the preferred or perhaps even &#34;correct&#34; method to use, but for me it worked, was quick and allowed me to immediately edit data in the table.
With SQL Server [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/open-table-option-missing-in-sql-2008/">Open Table Option Missing in SQL 2008</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting my first experience working with the newest version of <a title="Microsoft SQL Server website" href="http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/default.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s SQL Server</a>. We recently installed <a title="SQL Server 2008" href="http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/default.aspx" target="_blank">SQL Server 2008</a> at a client and we are setting up a web application on their servers now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/opentablemissingsql2008.gif"><img border="0" alt="open-table-missing-sql-2008" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/opentablemissingsql2008-thumb.gif" width="575" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>In&#160; my experience with SQL when I needed to edit data in a table I would right-click on the table name and select &quot;Open Table&quot; to display all the data in that table. I realize this probably isn&#8217;t the preferred or perhaps even &quot;correct&quot; method to use, but for me it worked, was quick and allowed me to immediately edit data in the table.</p>
<p>With <a title="SQL 2008 Open Table Is Gone" href="http://officepoint.blogspot.com/2008/08/sql-2008-open-table-is-gone.html" target="_blank">SQL Server 2008 the &quot;Open Table&quot; option is now gone</a>. Instead the select statement defaults to the Top 200 results. You can switch to SQL view and remove the &quot;Top 200&quot; specification, but it&#8217;s another step in the process. </p>
<p>What should have been done is to allow the user a configurable setting. Somewhere in preferences let the user specify if they&#8217;d rather have the entire table open or a &quot;Top&quot; list that they can still specify the number of rows to return.</p>
<p>My other challenge is that my SQL Server Management Studio 2005 application doesn&#8217;t suppress the &quot;Open Table&quot; command from the right-click contextual menu. Instead, it just gives me the error shown above. Now debating on whether I need to go ahead and upgrade to the latest version of the studio application. Hoping it won&#8217;t have negative impact on the older versions of SQL we&#8217;re also managing on other servers.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/open-table-option-missing-in-sql-2008/">Open Table Option Missing in SQL 2008</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/open-table-option-missing-in-sql-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bento for iPhone and iPod Touch Out Now</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bento-for-iphone-and-ipod-touch-out-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bento-for-iphone-and-ipod-touch-out-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juan Magdaraog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/?p=66875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filemaker Inc. announced today, the mobile version of its Bento database application. For $4.99, iPhone and iPod Touch users can have the power of Bento in their hands. They can use it as standalone application for their mobile device or in tandem with the desktop app in order to sync and have their data wherever they go.
The mobile app comes with 25 pre-designed and ready to use templates, which can have you up and running in minutes. They&#8217;re also customizable so that you can add other data that you want. It also ships with a blank template so you can [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bento-for-iphone-and-ipod-touch-out-now/">Bento for iPhone and iPod Touch Out Now</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filemaker.com/">Filemaker Inc.</a> announced today, the mobile version of its Bento database application. For $4.99, iPhone and iPod Touch users can have the power of Bento in their hands. They can use it as standalone application for their mobile device or in tandem with the desktop app in order to sync and have their data wherever they go.</p>
<div id="attachment_66878" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-66878" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/05/38143-hi-img_00771-300x300.jpg" alt="Bento app for iPhone and iPod Touch" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bento app for iPhone and iPod Touch</p></div>
<p>The mobile app comes with 25 pre-designed and ready to use templates, which can have you up and running in minutes. They&#8217;re also customizable so that you can add other data that you want. It also ships with a blank template so you can create your own custom template.</p>
<p>It also integrates with the iPhone / iPod Touch&#8217;s existing applications, such as Contacts, Safari, Mail, Phone dialing and Google Maps for a better all around experience.</p>
<p>The app&#8217;s release is actually quite coincidental since I just downloaded the trial version of the desktop version of Bento. I think I really need a database app for some new things that I&#8217;m venturing into. I&#8217;m exploring to explore Bento and see if it fits my needs or should I go for broke and get Filemaker Pro. I do wish that there was a trial version for the mobile version of Bento. While $4.99 isn&#8217;t exactly a lot of money, it&#8217;s still money and in these trying times you really don&#8217;t want to be spending on something you won&#8217;t be using.</p>
<p>Check out the complete <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/filemaker/38143/">press release of the Bento for iPhone and iPod Touch</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bento-for-iphone-and-ipod-touch-out-now/">Bento for iPhone and iPod Touch Out Now</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/bento-for-iphone-and-ipod-touch-out-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access Slowdown Splitting Data From App</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/access-slowdown-splitting-data-from-app/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/access-slowdown-splitting-data-from-app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/access-slowdown-splitting-data-from-app/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve run across a little bit of an issue with an application for a client that we&#8217;ve been working on the last few days. We&#8217;ve re-written an Access database application. Our normal protocol is to always separate the data from the application.
The problem is that when we do this the application runs it&#8217;s processing routines and queries run at fractions of the speed. When the data and application are joined, the queries run and process 300+ records in just over a minute. When separated that time jumps to about 30-45 minutes.
Has anyone seen this and determined a solution for making [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/access-slowdown-splitting-data-from-app/">Access Slowdown Splitting Data From App</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run across a little bit of an issue with an application for a client that we&#8217;ve been working on the last few days. We&#8217;ve re-written an <a title="Microsoft Access 2007" href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access/default.aspx" target="_blank">Access database application</a>. Our normal protocol is to always separate the data from the application.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 585px"><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/05/access2007.gif"><img style="border: 0pt none" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/05/access2007-thumb.gif" border="0" alt="access-2007" width="575" height="242" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Microsoft Access 2007 Information Options</p></div>
<p>The problem is that when we do this the application runs it&#8217;s processing routines and queries run at fractions of the speed. When the data and application are joined, the queries run and process 300+ records in just over a minute. When separated that time jumps to about 30-45 minutes.</p>
<p>Has anyone seen this and determined a solution for making it not happen? I read of some issues that may cause it to be happening, but we have implemented any of the specific items mentioned in that article.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/access-slowdown-splitting-data-from-app/">Access Slowdown Splitting Data From App</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/access-slowdown-splitting-data-from-app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
