<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Energy-Star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/energy-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does Microsoft Being &#8220;Green&#8221; Mean Anything to You?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/does-microsoft-being-green-mean-anything-to-you-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/does-microsoft-being-green-mean-anything-to-you-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy-Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary-Jo-Foley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows-Server-2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftweblog.com/2007/06/05/does-microsoft-being-green-mean-anything-to-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mary Jo Foley shares an article on ZD Net with us on how Microsoft is shooting after the target of being more environmentally conscious with it&#8217;s computers. It&#8217;s only described in how their expected Windows Server 2007 is going to use 20% less power.
How this will work is that the processor will slow down when it&#8217;s not needed to do what processors do. To me this is just obvious and doesn&#8217;t take much thought but I&#8217;m sure there were technical reasons on why this is a big deal. For me it&#8217;s like saying, &#8220;You know you&#8217;d save more gas if you [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/does-microsoft-being-green-mean-anything-to-you-59/">Does Microsoft Being &#8220;Green&#8221; Mean Anything to You?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=489" title="Microsoft steps up its green datacenter campaign">Mary Jo Foley shares an article</a> on ZD Net with us on how Microsoft is shooting after the target of being more environmentally conscious with it&#8217;s computers. It&#8217;s only described in how their expected Windows Server 2007 is going to use 20% less power.</p>
<p>How this will work is that the processor will slow down when it&#8217;s not needed to do what processors do. To me this is just obvious and doesn&#8217;t take much thought but I&#8217;m sure there were technical reasons on why this is a big deal. For me it&#8217;s like saying, &#8220;You know you&#8217;d save more gas if you didn&#8217;t keep your engine at 4000RPM&#8217;s at the stoplight.&#8221;</p>
<p>But with all this talk about being green, does it really impact your opinion or perception of Microsoft? Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think they should pursue this type of stuff by default, but I also wonder what other areas of the environment they impact as an organization that might have more impact.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/does-microsoft-being-green-mean-anything-to-you-59/">Does Microsoft Being &#8220;Green&#8221; Mean Anything to You?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/does-microsoft-being-green-mean-anything-to-you-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
