<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Hubble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/hubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:11:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Text Costs More Than Hubble Data</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/text-costs-more-than-hubble-data-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/text-costs-more-than-hubble-data-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jayvee Fernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/text-costs-more-than-hubble-data/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Think texting is cheap? Think again. The University of Leicester&#8217;s Dr. Nigel Bannister points out that the cost of SMS is, quite literally, astronomical.
&#8220;The bottom line is texting is at least 4 times more expensive than transmitting data from Hubble, and is likely to be substantially more than that.
&#8220;The maximum size for a text message is 160 characters, which takes 140 bytes because there are only 7 bits per character in the text messaging system, and we assume the average price for a text message is 5p. There are 1,048,576 bytes in a megabyte, so that&#8217;s 1 million/140 = 7490 [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/text-costs-more-than-hubble-data-608/">Text Costs More Than Hubble Data</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2008/05/texting-hubble.jpg" alt="Texting Hubble" border="0" /></div>
<p>Think texting is cheap? Think again. The University of Leicester&#8217;s Dr. Nigel Bannister points out that the cost of SMS is, quite literally, <a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/31095.php">astronomical</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The bottom line is texting is at least 4 times more expensive than transmitting data from Hubble, and is likely to be substantially more than that.</p>
<p>&#8220;The maximum size for a text message is 160 characters, which takes 140 bytes because there are only 7 bits per character in the text messaging system, and we assume the average price for a text message is 5p. There are 1,048,576 bytes in a megabyte, so that&#8217;s 1 million/140 = 7490 text messages to transmit one megabyte. At 5p each, that&#8217;s £374.49 per MB &#8211; or about 4.4 times more expensive than the &#8216;most pessimistic&#8217; estimate for Hubble Space Telescope transmission costs.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Now you know why cellular networks keep kids addicted to SMS while dragging their feet on data services. They want to keep customers paying more for less.</p>
<p>(Phones via <a href="http://maurozea.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/brits-love-texting/">Mauro</a>. Hubble via <a href="http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/OpenDay/HST/">Cambridge</a>.)</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/text-costs-more-than-hubble-data-608/">Text Costs More Than Hubble Data</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/text-costs-more-than-hubble-data-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>