<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; ibm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:30:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IBM Going Web Based</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-going-web-based/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-going-web-based/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milo Riano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LotuLive iNotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-going-web-based/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MaximumPCs article on IBMs move to take on Google through the search giant’s “Google Apps” product line have caught my attention and I initially though IBM created a new product line for the competition. However; when I read the article I realized it was not a new and exciting application but a washed up, archaic product – Lotus Notes software suite. I first thought that IBM going web based on Lotus notes is a direct competition with Microsoft SharePoint, but then again, SharePoint is so dominant that there is no competition here anymore and a title like this is on [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-going-web-based/">IBM Going Web Based</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MaximumPCs article on IBMs move to take on Google through the search giant’s “Google Apps” product line have caught my attention and I initially though IBM created a new product line for the competition. However; when I read the article I realized it was not a new and exciting application but a washed up, archaic product – Lotus Notes software suite. I first thought that IBM going web based on Lotus notes is a direct competition with Microsoft SharePoint, but then again, SharePoint is so dominant that there is no competition here anymore and a title like this is on spot &#8212; “IBM Online Lotus Notes Competes with Google Apps”.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/10/image1.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px;border-top-width: 0px;border-bottom-width: 0px;border-left-width: 0px" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/10/image_thumb1.png" width="119" height="62" /></a> </p>
<p>For the last four years the migration from Lotus Notes to SharePoint is all over my work environment and I worked on a number of projects related to this migration. Simply put, I thought Lotus notes was dead and IBM making their product online is only for breathing new life or extending its life.</p>
<p>The online Lotus Notes is called “LotusLive iNotes” which includes email, calendar and contact management. First I don’t like the name, it is long and seems like a tongue twister. Second, the offerings are so small that it doesn’t sound like a product from the behemoth IBM.</p>
<p>The only positive note here is that IBM is not offering this to the consumer market and is only offered to the enterprise. This should give LotusLive iNotes a branding and could get the confidence of businesses to go ahead and use IBM product over the web.</p>
<p>There is no way IBM is going to compete with Microsoft on this space and they could however; steal away some customers from Google’s enterprise market.</p>
<p>Read the full article here – “<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/ibm_takes_google_apps">IBM Takes on Google Apps</a>”</p>
<p><em>Image from IBM.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-going-web-based/">IBM Going Web Based</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-going-web-based/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if Your Remote Could Tweet?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-if-your-remote-could-tweet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-if-your-remote-could-tweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Parrish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking remote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweevice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/?p=82870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a new patent filing, IBM is working on a TV remote control that can automatically post what you&#8217;re watching to Twitter. (Or any other microblogging service.) It&#8217;s called a &#8220;networking remote,&#8221; and it could signal the arrival of a something I&#8217;m coining a brand new term for right now: the Tweevice.

The Baltimore Sun first dug up IBM&#8217;s patent, pointing out that it was originally filed last year, but only recently was posted on the U.S. Patent Office website. The networking remote could have built-in tags to go along with your Tweets, or you could program in customized tags [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-if-your-remote-could-tweet/">What if Your Remote Could Tweet?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new patent filing, IBM is working on a TV remote control that can automatically post what you&#8217;re watching to Twitter. (Or any other microblogging service.) It&#8217;s called a &#8220;networking remote,&#8221; and it could signal the arrival of a something I&#8217;m coining a brand new term for right now: the <strong>Tweevice</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-82871" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/08/twitter_remote.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="350" /></p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/technology/2009/08/ibm_building_a_tv_remote_that.html" target="_blank"><em>The Baltimore Sun</em></a> first dug up IBM&#8217;s patent, pointing out that it was originally filed last year, but only recently was <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&amp;r=5&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;co1=AND&amp;d=PTXT&amp;s1=Facebook&amp;OS=Facebook&amp;RS=Facebook" target="_blank">posted</a> on the U.S. Patent Office website. The networking remote could have built-in tags to go along with your Tweets, or you could program in customized tags that you could then access with the mash of a button.</p>
<p>If IBM&#8217;s remote control catches on, I can&#8217;t help wondering what other Tweevices we might see. A Tweeting GPS for your car that posts your whereabouts? A Tweeting fridge that tells the world what you&#8217;re having for dinner (and maybe even when you&#8217;re cheating on your diet)? A Tweeting power tool that lets all your friends know when you&#8217;re working on a new project?</p>
<p>(Side note: I wonder how long it will be before everyone that was so concerned about online privacy a few years ago realizes that that same privacy has been <em>tricked </em>out of them by the wonders of social media?)</p>
<p>But the very notion of a Tweevice begs the question: Do we <em>need</em> a remote control that can auto-blog? I believe Twitter to be a legitimately useful service, but I have to admit that there&#8217;s a lot of ridiculously trivial information spread through it.</p>
<p>Do all of your friends <em>really</em> need to know that you&#8217;re watching <em>Dog the Bounty Hunter</em> right-this-very-second?</p>
<p><em>Image by Robin Parrish.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-if-your-remote-could-tweet/">What if Your Remote Could Tweet?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/what-if-your-remote-could-tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM is the Greenest on Supercomputers</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-is-the-greenest-on-supercomputers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-is-the-greenest-on-supercomputers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Milo Riano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BladeCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM Supercomputers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFlops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supercomputers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-is-the-greenest-on-supercomputers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM led the industry by building the world’s fastest computers and now they are not only building the fastest computers but they are building the greenest of them all. IBM has built 18 of the 19 most efficient supercomputers in the world as released by the Green500 evaluators.
 
Green500 lists the fastest 500 computers in the world and analyses them and ranks them based on their efficiency and performance per watts. This is where IBM dominates all other tech companies.
The number one supercomputer is the company’s Roadrunner system which is stationed at the Department of Energy’s Los Alamos National Laboratory; [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-is-the-greenest-on-supercomputers/">IBM is the Greenest on Supercomputers</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM led the industry by building the world’s fastest computers and now they are not only building the fastest computers but they are building the greenest of them all. IBM has built 18 of the 19 most efficient supercomputers in the world as released by the Green500 evaluators.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/08/image25.png"><img style="border-right: 0px;border-top: 0px;border-left: 0px;border-bottom: 0px" height="53" alt="image" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/2009/08/image_thumb11.png" width="114" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>Green500 lists the fastest 500 computers in the world and analyses them and ranks them based on their efficiency and performance per watts. This is where IBM dominates all other tech companies.</p>
<p>The number one supercomputer is the company’s Roadrunner system which is stationed at the Department of Energy’s Los Alamos National Laboratory; however, this supercomputer only ranks fourth in the list of green computers whose frontrunners are still owned by IBM.</p>
<p>Green computers are measured in MFLops per watt where “1 MFlop” is equivalent to 1 million floating point operations per second.</p>
<p>The greenest computer is occupied by IBM’s BladeCenter cluster which is stationed at the University of Warsaw. This greenest supercomputer produced 536 MFlops for each watt of energy used.</p>
<p>Next to the BladeCenter are still IBM computers which is stationed at the Department of Energy and at IBM’s Poughkeepsie Benchmarking Center. </p>
<p>Of the top 100 greenest computers, IBM owns 57 of them and the highest non-IBM green supercomputer is stationed at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan and is named “Greatly Reduced Array of Processor Elements with Data Reduction (GRAPE-DR)”. Other vendors that made the list other than IBM are supercomputers from NEC where their highest ranked supercomputer is at number 20. NEC’s supercomputer uses Intel Xeon processors and is deployed at the University of Struttgart.</p>
<p>The average efficiency of these supercomputers is 108 MFlops per watt while the aggregate power was around 200 to 230 megawatts. </p>
<p>IBM may have sold their personal computer business which seemed like they have focused on their supercomputer production and now their dominance is not challenged by anyone. They would likely remain dominant on this market for decades to come.</p>
<p><em>Image from IBM.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-is-the-greenest-on-supercomputers/">IBM is the Greenest on Supercomputers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/ibm-is-the-greenest-on-supercomputers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
