<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Instant Messengers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/instant-messengers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Lively Does Not Make Me Lively</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-lively-does-not-make-me-lively-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-lively-does-not-make-me-lively-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jayvee Fernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lively]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/google-lively-does-not-make-me-lively/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I like to think I&#8217;m an okay gamer. I&#8217;ve been playing video games since the Atari 2600, so I can move fairly well within virtual worlds. I can Crippling Slash enemy monks in Guild Wars just as well as I can hoverboard with friendly girls in There.
Maybe that&#8217;s why my expectations of Google Lively might seem a little high. Given that games are bigger than movies, however, those expectations could soon become merely average.
Frankly, I&#8217;m not impressed with Google&#8217;s first stab at a virtual world. Don&#8217;t get me wrong; I&#8217;m as big a Google fan as the next guy. They [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-lively-does-not-make-me-lively-608/">Google Lively Does Not Make Me Lively</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5YbwfOucET8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5YbwfOucET8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object></div>
<p>I like to think I&#8217;m an okay gamer. I&#8217;ve been playing video games since the Atari 2600, so I can move fairly well within virtual worlds. I can Crippling Slash enemy monks in <em>Guild Wars</em> just as well as I can hoverboard with friendly girls in <em>There.</em></p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s why my expectations of <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/gta4-tops-iron-man-608/">Google Lively</a> might seem a little high. Given that <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/gta4-tops-iron-man-608/">games are bigger than movies</a>, however, those expectations could soon become merely average.<span id="more-49981"></span></p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m not impressed with Google&#8217;s first stab at a virtual world. Don&#8217;t get me wrong; <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/god-versus-google/">I&#8217;m as big a Google fan as the next guy</a>. They are the kings of all forms of aynchronous communication, from search to apps to ads to video.</p>
<p><em>Synchronous</em> communication, however, is still too fast for their data mining and ad contextualization systems. That&#8217;s why GTalk never caught on, that&#8217;s why YouTube does not have live video, and that&#8217;s why Lively fails to captivate me.</p>
<p>The attempt at a gamelike world, coupled with the attempt at a Web mashup, creates something that&#8217;s a jack of both and a master of neither. It&#8217;s limited, it&#8217;s slow, it&#8217;s unresponsive, and it&#8217;s counterintuitive. It&#8217;s not chatty enough for chat, and it&#8217;s not game enough for gaming.</p>
<p>Maybe I shouldn&#8217;t expect so much from Lively yet, since it&#8217;s still in beta. Maybe Lively will finally offer the perfect fusion of the Web and the metaverse. Maybe all that will happen down the line.</p>
<p>Until then, I&#8217;m playing real MMOs.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-lively-does-not-make-me-lively-608/">Google Lively Does Not Make Me Lively</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-lively-does-not-make-me-lively-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Pownce Invitations! API Coming Soon!</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-pownce-invitations-api-coming-soon-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-pownce-invitations-api-coming-soon-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jayvee Fernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/more-pownce-invitations-api-coming-soon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The bad news is that I&#8217;ve given away my first batch of six invitations to Digg founder Kevin Rose&#8217;s flexible yet elegant new IM service, Pownce. The good news is that I just got six more. If you want an invitation, post a comment here with your email address. First come, first served.
The even better news is they&#8217;ve just announced development of a public API. This thing&#8217;s only going to get even more flexible. Pownce away, baby.
Post from: EveryJoe
More Pownce Invitations! API Coming Soon!
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-pownce-invitations-api-coming-soon-608/">More Pownce Invitations! API Coming Soon!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2007/07/pownce-client.jpg' alt='Pownce' border='0' /></p>
<p>The bad news is that I&#8217;ve given away <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/pownce-invitations/" target="_blank">my first batch of six invitations</a> to Digg founder Kevin Rose&#8217;s flexible yet elegant new IM service, <a href="http://pownce.com/" target="_blank">Pownce</a>. The good news is that I just got six more. If you want an invitation, post a comment here with your email address. First come, first served.<span id="more-49655"></span></p>
<p>The even better news is they&#8217;ve just announced development of a <a href="http://blog.pownce.com/2007/07/25/coming-soon-the-pownce-public-api/" target="_blank">public API</a>. This thing&#8217;s only going to get even more flexible. Pownce away, baby.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-pownce-invitations-api-coming-soon-608/">More Pownce Invitations! API Coming Soon!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/more-pownce-invitations-api-coming-soon-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pownce Invitations!</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/pownce-invitations-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/pownce-invitations-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jayvee Fernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/pownce-invitations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;m giving away six invitations to Digg founder Kevin Rose&#8217;s new IM service, Pownce. Think Twitter on steroids: you can send text, links, files, and events to the whole world, all your friends, groups of your friends, or any one of your friends. Jeremiah Owyang has a great collection of reviews here.
If you want an invitation, post a comment here with your email address.  First come, first served. If you&#8217;re lucky, we&#8217;ll Pownce each other. :)
Post from: EveryJoe
Pownce Invitations!
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/pownce-invitations-608/">Pownce Invitations!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2007/07/pownce.jpg' alt='Pownce' border='0' /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m giving away six invitations to Digg founder Kevin Rose&#8217;s <a href="http://mikeabundo.com/2007/05/10/digg-founder-to-launch-im-startup/" target="_blank">new</a> IM service, <a href="http://pownce.com/" target="_blank">Pownce</a>. Think Twitter on steroids: you can send text, links, files, and events to the whole world, all your friends, groups of your friends, or any one of your friends. Jeremiah Owyang has a great collection of reviews <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/06/30/keeping-track-of-the-pownce-reviews/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>If you want an invitation, post a comment here with your email address.  First come, first served. If you&#8217;re lucky, we&#8217;ll Pownce each other. :)</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/pownce-invitations-608/">Pownce Invitations!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/pownce-invitations-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Talk Follow-up</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-follow-up-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-follow-up-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/google-talk-follow-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve continued troubleshooting and determined that my errors with Google Talk embedded in Gmail may be exclusively tied to IE7. I opened Gmail in Firefox and everything worked fine.
I&#8217;ve gone through security settings and add-ons to see if anything was being blocked and didn&#8217;t see anything that I&#8217;m aware of specifically.
Anyone have any ideas (other than telling me to switch back to Firefox)?
Post from: EveryJoe
Google Talk Follow-up
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-follow-up-608/">Google Talk Follow-up</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve continued troubleshooting and determined that <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/google-talk-embedded-in-gmail-difficulties/">my errors with Google Talk embedded in Gmail</a> may be exclusively tied to IE7. I opened Gmail in Firefox and everything worked fine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gone through security settings and add-ons to see if anything was being blocked and didn&#8217;t see anything that I&#8217;m aware of specifically.</p>
<p>Anyone have any ideas (other than telling me to switch back to Firefox)?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-follow-up-608/">Google Talk Follow-up</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-follow-up-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Talk Embedded in Gmail Difficulties</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-embedded-in-gmail-difficulties-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-embedded-in-gmail-difficulties-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/google-talk-embedded-in-gmail-difficulties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is anyone else experiencing this problem?
I&#8217;ve been getting this error now for almost a week. I&#8217;ve talked to other friends that are using Google Talk embedded in Gmail and they aren&#8217;t experiencing the same issues?
Trying to figure out of it&#8217;s just me or my computer. Don&#8217;t think so since it&#8217;s happening on both my personal desktop and my business laptop.
Sure would be nice if the&#8217;d fix it though. Does anyone know if Google Talk works better now with Trillian? I had it working once before, but it was just too wonky then as well.
Post from: EveryJoe
Google Talk Embedded in Gmail [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-embedded-in-gmail-difficulties-608/">Google Talk Embedded in Gmail Difficulties</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image329" alt="Google Talk Embedded in Gmail Error" hspace="5" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2006/12/gmail-gtalk-error1.gif" align="left" />Is anyone else experiencing this problem?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been getting this error now for almost a week. I&#8217;ve talked to other friends that are using Google Talk embedded in Gmail and they aren&#8217;t experiencing the same issues?</p>
<p>Trying to figure out of it&#8217;s just me or my computer. Don&#8217;t think so since it&#8217;s happening on both my personal desktop and my business laptop.</p>
<p>Sure would be nice if the&#8217;d fix it though. Does anyone know if Google Talk works better now with <a href="http://www.ceruleanstudios.com/" target="_blank">Trillian</a>? I had it working once before, but it was just too wonky then as well.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-embedded-in-gmail-difficulties-608/">Google Talk Embedded in Gmail Difficulties</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-talk-embedded-in-gmail-difficulties-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Purchase Plaxo</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-purchase-plaxo-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-purchase-plaxo-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/google-to-purchase-plaxo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a Plaxo user and I love the service. I was hesitant at first, but a friend of mine kept hounding me about how great the service was and that they weren&#8217;t out to just harvest e-mail addresses for spammers.
Colbert Low has an interesting post at Profy.com about the possibility of Google purchasing Plaxo. Although it came from left-field for me, I think it makes plenty of sense. Google is always looking for more potential customers and &#8220;eyes&#8221; for advertising dollars. Plaxo is a great and simple service, and the one thing it might need to improve is just a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-purchase-plaxo-608/">Google to Purchase Plaxo</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Plaxo user and I love the service. I was hesitant at first, but a friend of mine kept hounding me about how great the service was and that they weren&#8217;t out to just harvest e-mail addresses for spammers.</p>
<p>Colbert Low has an interesting post at Profy.com about the possibility of Google purchasing Plaxo. Although it came from left-field for me, I think it makes plenty of sense. Google is always looking for more potential customers and &#8220;eyes&#8221; for advertising dollars. Plaxo is a great and simple service, and the one thing it might need to improve is just a big &#8220;trusted&#8221; name behind them.</p>
<blockquote><p>With Plaxo’s web savvy users’ database of 15M, it should be a great bargain for Google or any other party interested in acquiring them for advertising purposes. But let’s just wait and see what happens in another 6 months’ time.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting for sure, we&#8217;ll see what happens in 6 months, or maybe less.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.profy.com/2006/12/04/will-google-buy-plaxo/" target="_blank">Will Google Buy Plaxo</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-purchase-plaxo-608/">Google to Purchase Plaxo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-to-purchase-plaxo-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL Mail Still a Spam Magnet</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-mail-still-a-spam-magnet-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-mail-still-a-spam-magnet-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/aol-mail-still-a-spam-magnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Why is it that AOL mail, or specifically my AIM mail account, continues to be a spam magnet? I don&#8217;t provide my e-mail address for this account to anyone, I never include it on web forms or on web pages. 3 of 5 messages from my account above are sent specifically to my AOL/AIM address, the other two I don&#8217;t even appear in the recipients field.
AOL could do lots of things to improve their services, a major one would be cracking down on SPAM for their customers.
The 2nd e-mail above is a blatant phishing scam. I would think at the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-mail-still-a-spam-magnet-608/">AOL Mail Still a Spam Magnet</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image292" alt="AIM SPAM MAIL" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2006/11/aim_mail.gif" /></p>
<p>Why is it that AOL mail, or specifically my AIM mail account, continues to be a spam magnet? I don&#8217;t provide my e-mail address for this account to anyone, I never include it on web forms or on web pages. 3 of 5 messages from my account above are sent specifically to my AOL/AIM address, the other two I don&#8217;t even appear in the recipients field.</p>
<p>AOL could do lots of things to improve their services, a major one would be cracking down on SPAM for their customers.</p>
<p>The 2nd e-mail above is a blatant phishing scam. I would think at the very least AOL could look for mentions of their own name spoofed in e-mails that also contained the words &#8220;security&#8221; &#8220;account&#8221; and other targeted phrases. How is it that Google does this so well with their mail.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-mail-still-a-spam-magnet-608/">AOL Mail Still a Spam Magnet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-mail-still-a-spam-magnet-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Bookmarks Quick Review</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-bookmarks-quick-review-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-bookmarks-quick-review-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/yahoo-bookmarks-quick-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick thought on the new Yahoo Toolbar with bookmarks feature. Overall I really like the idea and it&#8217;s a very clean and smooth design.
My only problem is all my bookmarks that weren&#8217;t already in a specific folder have gone bye-bye somewhere.
All of my bookmarks highlighted over there in the screen grab are completely missing from the bookmarks drop-down that used to be available from the toolbar.
This is a real pain because the reason they weren&#8217;t in a folder was because these were the bookmarks I used EVERY DAY, MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY. I didn&#8217;t want them buried in a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-bookmarks-quick-review-608/">Yahoo Bookmarks Quick Review</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image275" alt="New Yahoo Bookmarks Toolbar" hspace="10" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2006/10/ybookmarks.gif" align="left" />A quick thought on the new Yahoo Toolbar with bookmarks feature. Overall I really like the idea and it&#8217;s a very clean and smooth design.</p>
<p>My only problem is all my bookmarks that weren&#8217;t already in a specific folder have gone bye-bye somewhere.</p>
<p>All of my bookmarks highlighted over there in the screen grab are completely missing from the bookmarks drop-down that used to be available from the toolbar.</p>
<p>This is a real pain because the reason they weren&#8217;t in a folder was because these were the bookmarks I used EVERY DAY, MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY. I didn&#8217;t want them buried in a folder. Now they&#8217;re nowhere to be found.</p>
<p>Anyone else tried this out? What&#8217;s your experience? I&#8217;m pretty close to uninstalling the beta toolbar and going back to previous version. I need those frequently used bookmarks in my toolbar.</p>
<p>The reason I liked them in the toolbar was because they were always available from any computer I logged into on the internet. Nice feature! Don&#8217;t take that away from me.</p>
<p>On an additional note, the Google toolbar has upgraded some of their features and they have a wealth of new buttons you can add to your toolbar. Nicely done Google, nicely done. Since I lost my Gmail bookmark from my Yahoo! toolbar, I guess it&#8217;s pretty obvious that I should just put the button on my Google Toolbar don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-bookmarks-quick-review-608/">Yahoo Bookmarks Quick Review</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/yahoo-bookmarks-quick-review-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL OpenRide</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-openride-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-openride-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/aol-openride/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you remember, I was regularly posting back towards the end of AOL as we know it, that I thought the changes they were making were exactly what they needed to do.
It looks like AOL&#8217;s &#8220;OpenRide&#8221; software is coming together nicely. Has anyone used it?
Let me know.
Post from: EveryJoe
AOL OpenRide
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-openride-608/">AOL OpenRide</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you remember, I was regularly posting back towards the end of AOL as we know it, that I thought the changes they were making were exactly what they needed to do.</p>
<p>It looks like AOL&#8217;s &#8220;OpenRide&#8221; software is coming together nicely. Has anyone used it?</p>
<p>Let me know.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-openride-608/">AOL OpenRide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/aol-openride-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Advertising GTalk</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-advertising-gtalk-608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-advertising-gtalk-608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideup.com/google-advertising-gtalk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there anyone that uses Gmail that&#8217;s not aware of GTalk? Are you using Gmail?
Would you rather also have GTalk running as a separate application, or do you like just using it embedded within Gmail? I prefer having it embedded instead of having a separate application running in my task tray.
Actually my IM preference is Trillian by Cerulean Studios. I&#8217;ve loved that application ever since I heard about it. It especially came in handy when I used to be signed onto AIM and MSN with multiple screen names. At that point in time I had 6 screen names signed in [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-advertising-gtalk-608/">Google Advertising GTalk</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" alt="Google Talk Ad in Gmail" id="image265" src="http://www.everyjoe.com/files/608/2006/10/gtalkad.gif" />Is there anyone that uses Gmail that&#8217;s not aware of GTalk? Are you using Gmail?</p>
<p>Would you rather also have GTalk running as a separate application, or do you like just using it embedded within Gmail? I prefer having it embedded instead of having a separate application running in my task tray.</p>
<p>Actually my IM preference is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ceruleanstudios.com/">Trillian by Cerulean Studios</a>. I&#8217;ve loved that application ever since I heard about it. It especially came in handy when I used to be signed onto <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aim.com/">AIM</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://get.live.com/messenger/overview">MSN</a> with multiple screen names. At that point in time I had 6 screen names signed in at once and Trillian made it super-simple to manage all the buddy lists in a single unit.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-advertising-gtalk-608/">Google Advertising GTalk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/google-advertising-gtalk-608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>