Walsh turned over videotapes last week but the much-anticipated footage of the pre-Super Bowl XXXVI walkthrough of the St. Louis Rams‘ practice was not among them. Expect Walsh to be grilled all the same.

If we were asking Matt Walsh questions, here’s what they would be:

1  Is it true that you accidentally recorded Dancing With the Stars (when Mario left) over the all-important pre-Super Bowl XXXVI walkthrough tape? Or was it Britney Spears’ first cameo on How I Met Your Mother that ruined the evidence?

2  How’s your golf pro business doing since “Matt Walsh” went from total obscurity to household name (among NFL fans)? Has the publicity been good?

3  How much did you bet on the New York Giants in the Super Bowl this year? Did you lock in the odds on the Giants just before the story broke on February 2, the day before the Super Bowl?

4 How deep inside Senator Arlen Specter’s pocket are you? Did he promise you season tickets to the Philadelphia Eagles?

5  Bridget Monyahan or Gisele Bundchen?

Bridget Moynahan seems to be indicating the length of something here . . .

Gisele Bundchen and Tom Brady laughing, possibly even about Bridget Moynahan and how she’s changing diapers while they’re out on the town.

Images: Used courtesy of www.splashnewsonline.com

Post from: EveryJoe

5 (Or So) Questions We’d Ask Matt Walsh

Usually, when you’re talking about evidence supporting a videotape claim, said evidence is—wait for it—the videotape itself. Not eight other videotapes of signals involving other teams and other games. Somehow Walsh, who turned over those irrelevant-the-Rams-issue tapes, must subscribe to the logic “If X=Y and Z=Y, then A=B because, well, because I said so.”

Or something like that.

Michael Levy, Walsh’s lawyer, added yet another “WTF?” to the mix by stating (per ESPN) that

“Mr. Walsh has never claimed to have a tape of the walk-through . . . Mr. Walsh has never been the source of any of the media speculation about such a tape. Mr. Walsh was not the source for the Feb. 2 Boston Herald article.”

So let’s get this straight: Walsh (and two others) videotaped for the Patriots during the timeframe in question. Walsh gave up tapes. But he didn’t turn over evidence of the high-profile allegation linking his name to the Rams case. (Google ”Matt Walsh” and “St. Louis Rams.” We garnered 44,200 hits. Now go re-read Levy’s comments).

This makes less sense than the fact that Paris Hilton pulled down $150K for partying at a London nightclub.

Oh, and given that the eight tapes are consistent with what the Pats already ‘fessed up to, there’s no news here. Somebody–Walsh, his lawyer, the Boston Herald, the Patriots, the NFL–has some ’splainin’ to do about this mess.

What’s more idiotic: Matt Walsh not providing a Pats-Rams Super Bowl tape or the realization that someone paid Paris Hilton $150K to show up at a London nightclub?

Image: Used courtesy of www.splashnewsonline.com

Post from: EveryJoe

Lawyer for Ex-Pats Videotaper Matt Walsh: He Never Claimed to Have a Rams Tape