<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; Miss604</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everyjoe.com/tag/miss604/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports News - Tech Reviews - Entertainment - Life Tips for EveryJoe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter killed the blogging star?</title>
		<link>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/twitter-killed-the-blogging-star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/twitter-killed-the-blogging-star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colleen Coplick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs are dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miss604]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Boutin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzznetworker.com/twitter-killed-the-blogging-star/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A couple of days ago, Wired&#8217;s Paul Boutin claimed that blogging was dead with this lede:
Thinking about launching your own blog? Here&#8217;s some friendly advice: Don&#8217;t. And if you&#8217;ve already got one, pull the plug.
So&#8230;. ok. Fine. Blogging is *so* 2004. Everyone&#8217;s gone to Twitter etc, blah blah blah.
What&#8217;s this really? This article? Is blogging dead?
No.
You&#8217;re here.
I&#8217;m here.
I&#8217;m here a lot. Heck, many of you guys are here a lot. I can tell. (I have my ways&#8230;. mwa-ha-ha!)
What I see in Boutin&#8217;s article, is that he&#8217;s being inflammatory. He&#8217;s trying to stir shit up. Hell, it&#8217;s one of the tenets [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/twitter-killed-the-blogging-star/">Twitter killed the blogging star?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A couple of days ago, <a href="http://www.wired.com" target="_blank">Wired&#8217;s</a> Paul Boutin claimed that <a href="http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/magazine/16-11/st_essay" target="_blank">blogging was dead</a> with this lede:</p>
<blockquote><p>Thinking about launching your own blog? Here&#8217;s some friendly advice: Don&#8217;t. And if you&#8217;ve already got one, pull the plug.</p></blockquote>
<p>So&#8230;. ok. Fine. Blogging is *so* 2004. Everyone&#8217;s gone to <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> etc, blah blah blah.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s this <em>really</em>? This article? Is blogging dead?</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re <a href="http://www.buzznetworker.com" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m here a lot. Heck, many of you guys are here a lot. I can tell. (I have my ways&#8230;. mwa-ha-ha!)</p>
<p>What I see in <a href="http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/magazine/16-11/st_essay" target="_blank">Boutin&#8217;s article</a>, is that he&#8217;s being inflammatory. He&#8217;s trying to stir shit up. Hell, it&#8217;s one of the tenets of blogging. Controversy = page views and links. Which, totally correct, and Paul has done a fantastic job of doing <em>exactly</em> that. Page views? Hell yes. Links? OMG yes.  Hell, I&#8217;m plotting freelance articles that follow this exact formula. Give &#8216;em something controversial and watch the page views blow up.</p>
<p>In that regard, I&#8217;ve done <em>exactly</em> what Paul wanted, by looking at the article, blogging about it, and linking to it.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.miss604.com">Miss604</a> said, &#8220;I think blogging is changing (not dead); it’s evolving into something much bigger, allowing for more applications and tools to emerge in the online realm. It’s changing the conversation and allowing for more of a two-way street; you and your audience, wired and mobile, on and offline.&#8221;</p>
<p>She&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>Just sayin. Or maybe I&#8217;m just bloggin. whichever.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/twitter-killed-the-blogging-star/">Twitter killed the blogging star?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.everyjoe.com/articles/twitter-killed-the-blogging-star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
